Grade of deceased donor liver macrovesicular steatosis impacts graft and recipient outcomes more than the Donor Risk Index

被引:130
|
作者
de Graaf, Esther L. [2 ]
Kench, James [1 ]
Dilworth, Pamela [1 ]
Shackel, Nicholas A. [1 ]
Strasser, Simone I. [1 ]
Joseph, David [1 ]
Pleass, Henry [1 ]
Crawford, Michael [1 ]
McCaughan, Geoff W. [1 ]
Verran, Deborah J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Australian Natl Liver Transplantat Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Sch Med, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
allograft; Donor Risk Index; steatosis; transplantation; TRANSPLANTATION; SURVIVAL; EXPERIENCE; ALLOGRAFT; FAILURE; DISEASE; MODEL; POOL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06844.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim: Donor liver steatosis can impact on liver allograft outcomes. The aim of the present study was to comprehensively report on the impact of type and grade of donor steatosis, as well as donor and recipient factors, including the reported Donor Risk Index (DRI), on liver allograft outcomes. Methods: Areview of unit data for all adult liver transplant procedures from 2001 to 2007, as well as donor offers. Donor liver biopsies were regraded for steatosis by an experienced histopathologist. Results: Steatosis was detected in 184/255 (72%) of biopsies, of which 114 (62%) had microvesicular steatosis (MiS; 68 mild, 22 moderate, 24 severe) and 70 (38%) macrovesicular steatosis (MaS; 59 mild, 7 moderate, 4 severe). The majority (66/70, 94%) of biopsies with MaS also contained MiS. Allograft steatosis was associated with increasing donor body mass index (P = 0.000), plus donor male sex (P < 0.05). Primary non function (P = 0.002), early renal failure (P = 0.040), and requirement for retransplantation (P = 0.012) were associated only with severe MaS. Early biliary complications were associated with moderate MaS (P = 0.039). Only severe MaS was significantly associated with inferior allograft survival at 3 months (relative risk = 12.09 [8.75-19.05], P = 0.000) and 1 year (P = 0.000). Conclusions: MiS is a common finding and frequently coexists with MaS on liver allograft biopsy, while isolated MaS is uncommon. Only the presence of moderate to severe MaS is associated with inferior early allograft outcomes. The impact of severe MaS on allograft survival appears greater than other donor factors, including the calculated DRI.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 546
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Graft Selection on Donor and Recipient Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Braun, Hillary J.
    Dodge, Jennifer L.
    Roll, Garrett R.
    Freise, Chris E.
    Ascher, Nancy L.
    Roberts, John P.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (06) : 1244 - 1250
  • [22] Effect of Recipient-Donor Weight Mismatch on Graft Survival in High Kidney Donor Profile Index Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants
    Daoud, A.
    Zemin, S. M.
    Uehara, G.
    Salas, M. Posadas
    Soliman, K.
    Dubay, D.
    Taber, D.
    Casey, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S802 - S802
  • [23] Kidney Donor Risk Index Score Is More Reliable Than Kidney Donor Profile Index in Kidney Transplantation From Elderly Deceased Donors
    Jun, Heungman
    Yoon, Hye Eun
    Lee, Kang Wook
    Lee, Dong Ryeol
    Yang, Jaeseok
    Ahn, Curie
    Han, Sang Youb
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (06) : 1744 - 1748
  • [24] The role of recipient myosteatosis in graft and patient survival after deceased donor liver transplantation
    Czigany, Zoltan
    Kramp, Wiebke
    Lurje, Isabella
    Miller, Hannah
    Bednarsch, Jan
    Lang, Sven Arke
    Ulmer, Tom Florian
    Bruners, Philipp
    Strnad, Pavel
    Trautwein, Christian
    von Websky, Martin Wolfgang
    Tacke, Frank
    Neumann, Ulf Peter
    Lurje, Georg
    JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE, 2021, 12 (02) : 358 - 367
  • [25] The Liver Outcome Monitoring Registry Donor Risk Index: A New Measure of Deceased Donor Liver Quality
    Kurian, S.
    Case, J.
    Robinson, A.
    Barrick, B.
    Prentice, M.
    Marsh, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 517 - 517
  • [26] DONOR/RECIPIENT BODY SURFACE AREA RATIO AS A NOVEL PREDICTOR OF GRAFT SURVIVAL AFTER DECEASED DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    Corradini, Stefano Ginanni
    Siciliono, Maria
    Molinaro, Antonio
    Burza, Maria Antonello
    Pirozzi, Carlo
    Ferri, Flaminia
    Giusto, Michela
    Pugliese, Francesca
    Poli, Luca
    Merli, Manuela
    Attili, Adolfo F.
    Berloco, Pasquale Bartolomeo
    Rossi, Massimo
    HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 48 (04) : 545A - 546A
  • [27] Living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a surgeon-matched comparison of recipient morbidity and outcomes
    Reichman, Trevor W.
    Katchman, Helena
    Tanaka, Tomohiro
    Greig, Paul D.
    McGilvray, Ian D.
    Cattral, Mark S.
    Renner, Eberhard L.
    Selzner, Markus
    Ghanekar, Anand
    Levy, Gary
    Grant, David R.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 (08) : 780 - 787
  • [28] DONOR/RECIPIENT BODY SURFACE AREA RATIO AS A NOVEL PREDICTOR OF GRAFT SURVIVAL AFTER DECEASED DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    Corradini, S. Ginanni
    Siciliano, M.
    Molinaro, A.
    Burza, M. A.
    Pirazzi, C.
    Ferri, F.
    Giusto, M.
    Pugliese, F.
    Poli, L.
    Merli, M.
    Attili, A. F.
    Berloco, P. B.
    Rossi, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 50 : S70 - S70
  • [29] Kidney donor risk index is a good prognostic tool for graft outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation with short, cold ischemic time
    Han, Miyeun
    Jeong, Jong Cheol
    Koo, Tai Yeon
    Jeon, Hee Jung
    Kwon, Hyuk Yong
    Kim, Yoon Jung
    Ryu, Hyun Jin
    Ahn, Curie
    Yang, Jaeseok
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 28 (03) : 337 - 344
  • [30] ASSESSMENT OF DONOR-RECIPIENT SIZE MISMATCH BASED ON BODY SURFACE AREA INDEX AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON OUTCOMES OF DECEASED-DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTS
    Kostakis, Ioannis D.
    Raptis, Dimitri A.
    Davidson, Brian R.
    Iype, Satheesh
    Nasralla, David
    Imber, Charles
    Sharma, Dinesh
    Pissanou, Theodora
    Pollok, Joerg-Matthias
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 34 : 16 - 16