Quantitative evaluation of the influence of coal particle size distribution on gas diffusion coefficient by image processing method

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Jingjing [1 ]
Cheng, Deqiang [1 ]
Li, Yunlong [1 ]
Zhao, Kai [1 ]
Kou, Qiqi [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Informat & Control Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Image processing; Particle size distribution; Diffusion coefficient; Laser particle analyzer; Coal particles; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122946
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Coal particles have been widely used to measure the gas diffusion coefficient which is a key parameter to characterize the gas diffusion behavior, and the average particle size is a necessary parameter for calculating the diffusion coefficient. At present, people often use the arithmetic mean of upper and lower sieve surface specifications to characterize the average diameter of coal particles, which has large errors. It is necessary to obtain the particle size distribution in advance to determine the average diameter scientifically and accurately. A laser particle analyzer is usually used to measure particle size distribution, but due to the limitation of its measurement principle, it has poor measurement accuracy for irregular and large particles. In this article, we offer an integrated approach for quantitative evaluation of the influence of coal particle size distribution on gas diffusion coefficient. Laser particle analyzer and image analysis were used to measure the particle size distribution of 6 coal samples with the size range of 1 similar to 2 mm. Based on obtaining the size distribution, the average diameter was calculated. Then the diffusion coefficient was calculated by using the average diameter obtained by different methods. The results show that the particle size distribution measured by the laser method has a large deviation and poor repeatability, and the volume mean diameter calculated by it is far less than the arithmetic mean value of 1.5 mm. The imaging method can extract the morphological data of each particle, and so the obtained particle size distribution is more accurate and reliable. The equivalent area mean diameter calculated by the image method is close to 1.5 mm. The average diameter obtained by considering the particle size distribution can more truly reflect the particle size characteristics of coal samples, while the conventional method of using the arithmetic mean to calculate the diffusion coefficient will produce a non-negligible deviation. This also reveals the importance of obtaining particle size distribution when using the particle method to solve the diffusion coefficient.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental study on particle size distribution of impact crushed coal containing gas
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Hao
    Zhu, Jintuo
    Huang, Wenyi
    Zhao, Yuechen
    FUEL, 2022, 325
  • [32] Experimental study on particle size distribution of impact crushed coal containing gas
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Hao
    Zhu, Jintuo
    Huang, Wenyi
    Zhao, Yuechen
    FUEL, 2022, 325
  • [33] Multiscale measurements of gas diffusion coefficient of coal using counter-diffusion and image-based methods
    Baatar, Lkhamsuren
    Mostaghimi, Peyman
    Yuan, Meng
    Armstrong, Ryan T.
    Adler, Lewis
    Canbulat, Ismet
    Si, Guangyao
    Gaidarov, Batyrkhan
    Jing, Yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2023, 265
  • [34] Effect of coal particle size distribution on packed bed pressure drop and gas flow distribution
    Keyser, M. J.
    Conradie, M.
    Coertzen, M.
    Van Dyk, J. C.
    FUEL, 2006, 85 (10-11) : 1439 - 1445
  • [35] Evaluation of the weakening behavior of gas on the coal strength and its quantitative influence on the coal deformation
    Guo, Haijun
    Wang, Kai
    Wu, Yuchen
    Tang, Hanlu
    Wu, Jianguo
    Guan, Lianhe
    Chang, Chenyang
    Xu, Chao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 451 - 462
  • [36] Evaluation of the weakening behavior of gas on the coal strength and its quantitative influence on the coal deformation
    Haijun Guo
    Kai Wang
    Yuchen Wu
    Hanlu Tang
    Jianguo Wu
    Lianhe Guan
    Chenyang Chang
    Chao Xu
    International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2021, 31 (03) : 451 - 462
  • [37] EVALUATION OF A FIELD METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE GAS-DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT IN SOILS
    JELLICK, GJ
    SCHNABEL, RR
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1986, 50 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [38] QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION OF PARTICLE AND PORE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES
    SKVARA, F
    KONTA, J
    SILIKATY, 1978, 22 (01): : 61 - 68
  • [39] Adaptive image enhancement and particle size identification method based on coal and gangue
    Luo, Qisheng
    Wang, Shuang
    Guo, Yongcun
    He, Lei
    Li, Xin
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 34 (10)
  • [40] INFLUENCE OF ASH ON PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION EVOLUTION DURING COAL COMBUSTION
    DUNNRANKIN, D
    KERSTEIN, AR
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1988, 74 (02) : 207 - 218