Covarying variances: more morphologically variable populations also exhibit more diet variation

被引:39
|
作者
Snowberg, Lisa K. [1 ]
Hendrix, Kimberly M.
Bolnick, Daniel I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Sect Integrat Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecomorphology; Individual specialization; Niche variation hypothesis; Microhabitat preference; Stable isotopes; NICHE VARIATION HYPOTHESIS; GENETIC-VARIATION; TROPHIC POSITION; STABLE-ISOTOPES; ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE; ECOLOGICAL CAUSES; EVOLUTIONARY; STICKLEBACK; GASTEROSTEUS; SPECIALIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-014-3200-7
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Many ecologically generalized populations are composed of relatively specialized individuals that selectively consume a subset of their population's diet, a phenomenon known as 'individual specialization'. The Niche Variation Hypothesis posits that this individual specialization can arise during ecological release if niche expansion occurs mainly through diet divergence among individuals, leading to greater morphological variation. Most tests of this hypothesis have searched for correlations between niche width and morphological variance, but this approach rests on the untested assumption that within-population morphological diversity is highly correlated with ecological diversity. Here, we test whether intrapopulation diet variation is correlated with intrapopulation morphological variation, across 12 lacustrine populations of three-spine stickleback. First, we use behavioral observations, isotopes, and gut contents to show that, within populations, individuals differ in microhabitat use and diet. Second, we show that some populations exhibit more diet variation than others, as evidenced by differences in both isotopic and gut content variation among individuals. Finally, we confirm that populations with greater dietary variation are more morphologically variable. However, this relationship is only significant when total morphological variance is examined, not for individual morphological traits. This discordance may reflect among-population differences in the relationship between individual morphology and diet. Because morphology-diet relationships can differ among populations, morphological variance may be a poor predictor of actual diet variation when diverse populations are being compared.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 101
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Diversity of parental environments increases phenotypic variation in Arabidopsis populations more than genetic diversity but similarly affects productivity
    Puy, Javier
    Carmona, Carlos P.
    Dvorakova, Hana
    Latzel, Vit
    de Bello, Francesco
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2021, 127 (04) : 425 - 436
  • [32] Heat tolerance is more variable than cold tolerance across species of Iberian lizards after controlling for intraspecific variation
    Herrando-Perez, Salvador
    Monasterio, Camila
    Beukema, Wouter
    Gomes, Veronica
    Ferri-Yanez, Francisco
    Vieites, David R.
    Buckley, Lauren B.
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 34 (03) : 631 - 645
  • [33] Stickleback populations experiencing northern pike invasion show more among-population level variation than those without
    Stevens, D. R.
    Wund, M. A.
    Baker, J. A.
    Foster, S. A.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 61 : E863 - E863
  • [34] DNA barcode sheds light on species boundaries in the common morphologically variable rove beetle Quedius umbrinus-complex that puzzled taxonomists for more than a century (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae)
    Salnitska, Maria
    Solodovnikov, Alexey
    SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY, 2021, 19 (07) : 859 - 874
  • [35] A functional variation in PSA (KLK3) gene that confers lower risk is also associated with more aggressive disease and lower survival in men with prostate cancer
    Batra, Jyotsna
    Srinivasan, Srilakshmi
    Kryza, Thomas
    Bock, Nathalie
    Stephens, Carson
    Dong, Ying
    Panchadsaram, Janaththani
    Moya, Leire
    Rohl, Joan
    Perry-Keene, Joanna L.
    Buzacott, Katie
    Dadaev, Tokhir
    Brook, Mark N.
    Lilja, Hans
    Spurdle, Amanda
    Koistinen, Hannu
    Stenman, Ulf-Hakan
    Kote-Jarai, Zsofia
    Eeles, Rosalind
    Clements, Judith
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 : 23 - 23
  • [36] The adult body size variation of Dryas iulia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Heliconiinae) in different populations is more influenced by temperature variation than by host-plant availability during the seasons
    Mega, Nicolas Oliveira
    ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 17 (04) : 376 - 387
  • [37] Is dental metric variation more sensitive to differences among regional populations than dental morphology? A case study from coastal Kenya.
    Hubbard, Amelia R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2013, 150 : 153 - 153
  • [38] Are populations less genetically diverse and more differentiated at the species range edges? Analysis of the quantitative trait and molecular variation in wild oat Avena sterilis
    Volis, Sergei
    Ormanbekova, Danara
    Shulgina, Irina
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 69 (1-2) : 19 - 27
  • [39] Do large bushcrickets have more sensitive ears?: Natural variation in hearing thresholds within populations of the bushcricket Requena verticalis (Listroscelidinae: Tettigoniidae)
    Bailey, WJ
    PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1998, 23 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [40] Impact of river dynamics on the genetic variation of Gypsophila repens (Caryophyllaceae): a comparison of heath forest and more dynamic gravel bank populations along an alpine river
    Reisch, C.
    Sattler, J.
    PLANT BIOLOGY, 2021, 23 (01) : 205 - 211