Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: Passive Scattering versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy

被引:1
|
作者
Borowicz, Dorota Maria [1 ]
Shipulin, Konstantin N. [2 ]
Mytsin, Gennady V. [2 ]
Skrobala, Agnieszka [1 ,3 ]
Milecki, Piotr [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gayevsky, Victor N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Greater Poland Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, PL-61688 Poznan, Poland
[2] Joint Inst Nucl Res, Dzhelepov Lab Nucl Problems, Dubna 141980, Russia
[3] Poznan Univ Med Sci, Electroradiol Dept, PL-61688 Poznan, Poland
[4] Greater Poland Canc Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy 1, PL-61886 Poznan, Poland
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2021年 / 11卷 / 12期
关键词
proton therapy; prostate; ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BEAM THERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; TOXICITY;
D O I
10.3390/jpm11121311
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Few studies have directly compared passive scattering (PS) to intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in the delivery of ultra-hypofractionated proton beams to the localized prostate cancer (PCa). In this preliminary study involving five patients previously treated with CyberKnife, treatment plans were created for PS and IMPT (36.25 CGE in five fractions with two opposing fields) to compare the dosimetric parameters to the planning target volume (PTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR: rectum, bladder, femoral heads). Both plans met the acceptance criteria. Significant differences were observed in the minimum and maximum doses to the PTV. The mean dose to the PTV was lower for PS (35.62 +/- 0.26 vs. 37.18 +/- 0.14; p = 0.002). Target coverage (D98%) was better for IMPT (96.79% vs. 99.10%; p = 0.004). IMPT resulted in significantly lower mean doses to the rectum (16.75 CGE vs. 6.88 CGE; p = 0.004) and bladder (17.69 CGE vs. 5.98 CGE p = 0.002). High dose to the rectum (V36.25 CGE) were lower with PS, but not significantly opposite to high dose to the bladder. No significant differences were observed in mean conformity index values, with a non-significant trend towards higher mean homogeneity index values for PS. Non-significant differences in the gamma index for both fields were observed. These findings suggest that both PS and IMPT ultra-hypofractionated proton therapy for PCa are highly precise, offering good target coverage and sparing of normal tissues and OARs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In silico comparison of whole pelvis intensity-modulated photon versus proton therapy for the postoperative management of prostate cancer
    Gogineni, Emile
    Cruickshank, Ian K.
    Chen, Hao
    Halthore, Aditya
    Li, Heng
    Deville, Curtiland
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2023, 62 (06) : 642 - 647
  • [32] Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal proton therapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the treatment of metastatic brain cancer
    Sullivan, Matthew
    Jin, Hosang
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2023, 48 (02) : 73 - 76
  • [33] Photon Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Carbon Ion Therapy in the Delivery of Hypofractionated Thoracic Radiation Therapy
    Chi, A.
    Lin, L. C.
    Wen, S.
    Yan, H.
    Hsi, W. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 98 (01): : 234 - 235
  • [34] Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer
    Eren Celik
    Wolfgang Baus
    Christian Baues
    Wolfgang Schröder
    Alessandro Clivio
    Antonella Fogliata
    Marta Scorsetti
    Simone Marnitz
    Luca Cozzi
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [35] Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer
    Celik, Eren
    Baus, Wolfgang
    Baues, Christian
    Schroder, Wolfgang
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Marnitz, Simone
    Cozzi, Luca
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [36] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy-2 Effective Treatment Modalities for Nasopharyngeal Cancer
    Falchook, Aaron
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (06)
  • [37] Prospective Preference Assessment of Patients' Willingness to Participate in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Proton Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Shah, Anand
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Paly, Jonathan J.
    Halpern, Scott D.
    Bruner, Deborah W.
    Christodouleas, John P.
    Coen, John J.
    Deville, Curtiland, Jr.
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Shipley, William U.
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Hahn, Stephen M.
    Bekelman, Justin E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01): : E13 - E19
  • [38] Study On Secondary Cancer Risk Induced by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Passive Proton Beam Therapy
    Ahn, Sung Hwan
    Kim, Jingsung
    Cheong, Minho
    Shin, Dong Ho
    Park, Sung Yong
    Lee, Se Byeong
    Yoon, Myounggeun
    Kim, Woojin
    Park, Seokhwan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) : 2630 - +
  • [39] A Treatment Planning Comparison of Passive-Scattering and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Typical Tumor Sites
    Kase, Yuki
    Yamashita, Haruo
    Fuji, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Yuichi
    Pu, Yuehu
    Tsukishima, Chihiro
    Murayama, Shigeyuki
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (02) : 272 - 280
  • [40] HYPOFRACTIONATED INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY FOR LYMPH NODE METASTASIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    De Gersem, Werner
    De Neve, Wilfried
    Jacobs, Filip
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Vandecasteele, Katrien
    Villeirs, Geert
    De Meerleer, Gert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (04): : 1013 - 1020