On the advantage of stochastic methods in the modeling of ionospheric total electron content: Southeast Asia case study

被引:6
|
作者
Jarmolowski, Wojciech [1 ]
Ren, Xiaodong [2 ]
Wielgosz, Pawel [1 ]
Krypiak-Gregorczyk, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warmia & Mazury, Fac Geodesy Geospatial & Civil Engn, Olsztyn, Poland
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
TEC; PPP; ionosphere; least-squares collocation; altimetry; LEAST-SQUARES COLLOCATION; SATELLITE ALTIMETRY; DELAY ESTIMATION; VTEC MAPS; GPS; TEC; GNSS; DENSITY; SLANT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6501/ab0268
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This article describes an implementation of precise point positioning (PPP) and the least-squares collocation (LSC) method in the modeling of total electron content (TEC) in Southeast Asia, which is characterized by relatively homogeneous Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) data from International GNSS Service (IGS) stations and the occurrence of the highest TEC anomalies. A homogeneous coverage of the data in this region provides an opportunity for the testing of different spatial modeling methods applied to TEC data. The spherical harmonic expansion (SHE) and spherical splines (SS) have been the most popular mathematical tools for the interpolation of TEC in the ionosphere over the last decades. The developed stochastic model (PPPLSC) is compared with the well-known stochastic global UQRG model, which is interpolated by the ordinary kriging (OK) and CODG global TEC model based on spherical harmonics (SH), and also the IGSG model, which is a combination of several models developed by the IGS Ionosphere Associate Analysis Centers. These four models derived from different approaches are assessed together using self-consistency analysis based on a geometry-free combination of carrier-phase observations, and also using external validation employing dual-frequency altimeter TEC from three low-Earth-orbit satellites. The study implements the LSC modeling technique, which is quite new for TEC and is a valuable step towards increasing the accuracy and resolution of ionosphere models. LSC, similarly to OK, is a stochastic parametric technique, applying the covariance based on data properties. Therefore LSC restores the fullest possible signal in the interpolated model in terms of spatial resolution. Leave-one-out (LOO) validation of the covariance parameters assures optimal interpolation results in the least-squares sense. The covariance matrices of LSC parametrized by LOO validation enable estimation with reliable internal precision for the model. The self-consistency analysis of TEC models with the use of carrier-phase observations proves a better consistency of stochastic models in relation to TEC models based on SHE. The set of statistical values of external comparisons with three altimetry-derived trajectories of TEC observations additionally confirms the advantage of stochastic PPPLSC and UQRG models. The validation results all together indicate a better quality of stochastic models in relation to those based on the summation of spherical functions. The factor that is suspected to decrease the accuracy of the latter models is the loss of the higher frequency signal due to the spectral limitation coming from the low order of SHE applied in IGSG and CODG.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IGS real-time service for global ionospheric total electron content modeling
    Li, Zishen
    Wang, Ningbo
    Hernandez-Pajares, Manuel
    Yuan, Yunbin
    Krankowski, Andrzej
    Liu, Ang
    Zha, Jiuping
    Garcia-Rigo, Alberto
    Roma-Dollase, David
    Yang, Heng
    Laurichesse, Denis
    Blot, Alexis
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2020, 94 (03)
  • [22] IGS real-time service for global ionospheric total electron content modeling
    Zishen Li
    Ningbo Wang
    Manuel Hernández-Pajares
    Yunbin Yuan
    Andrzej Krankowski
    Ang Liu
    Jiuping Zha
    Alberto García-Rigo
    David Roma-Dollase
    Heng Yang
    Denis Laurichesse
    Alexis Blot
    Journal of Geodesy, 2020, 94
  • [23] Global and regional trends in ionospheric total electron content
    Lean, J. L.
    Emmert, J. T.
    Picone, J. M.
    Meier, R. R.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2011, 116
  • [24] Ionospheric total electron content responses to HILDCAA intervals
    da Silva, Regia Pereira
    Denardini, Clezio Marcos
    Marques, Manilo Soares
    Araujo Resende, Laysa Cristina
    Moro, Juliano
    da Silva Picanco, Giorgio Arlan
    Borba, Gilvan Luiz
    Ferreira dos Santos, Marcos Aurelio
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2020, 38 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [25] Response of Ionospheric Total Electron Content to Convective Vortices
    V. E. Pronin
    V. A. Pilipenko
    V. I. Zakharov
    D. L. Murr
    V. A. Martines-Bedenko
    Cosmic Research, 2019, 57 : 69 - 78
  • [26] A statistical study on seismo-ionospheric anomalies of the total electron content in China
    Liu, J. Y.
    Chen, Y. I.
    Huang, C. H.
    Chenand, C. H.
    Tsai, H. F.
    2014 XXXITH URSI GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM (URSI GASS), 2014,
  • [27] Ionospheric GNSS Total Electron Content for Tsunami Warning
    Liu, Jann-Yenq
    Lin, Chi-Yen
    Tsai, Yu-Lin
    Liu, Tien-Chi
    Hattori, Katsumi
    Sun, Yang-Yi
    Wu, Tso-Ren
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI, 2019, 13 (5-6)
  • [28] Ionospheric total electron content response to solar eclipses
    Tsai, HF
    Liu, JY
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1999, 104 (A6) : 12657 - 12668
  • [29] Towards Reliable Ionospheric Total Electron Content Nowcasting
    Zhukov, Aleksei
    Sidorov, Denis
    Yasyukevich, Yury
    Mylnikova, Anna
    2018 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSING TECHNOLOGY (ICST), 2018, : 299 - 302
  • [30] Response of Ionospheric Total Electron Content to Convective Vortices
    Pronin, V. E.
    Pilipenko, V. A.
    Zakharov, V. I.
    Murr, D. L.
    Martines-Bedenko, V. A.
    COSMIC RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (02) : 69 - 78