Review: Enhancing gastrointestinal health in dairy cows

被引:120
|
作者
Plaizier, J. C. [1 ]
Mesgaran, M. Danesh [2 ]
Derakhshani, H. [1 ]
Golder, H. [3 ]
Khafipour, E. [1 ]
Kleen, J. L. [4 ]
Lean, I. [3 ]
Loor, J. [5 ]
Penner, G. [6 ]
Zebeli, Q. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Anim Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Anim Sci, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran
[3] Scibus, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
[4] Cowconsult, Coldinnerstr 65, D-26532 Coldinne, Germany
[5] Univ Illinois, Dept Anim Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[6] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Anim & Poultry Sci, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada
[7] Vienna Univ Vet Med, Dept Farm Anim & Vet Publ Hlth, A-1210 Vienna, Austria
关键词
digestive tract; starch; microbiota; epithelium; acidosis; SUBACUTE RUMINAL ACIDOSIS; DIRECT-FED MICROBIALS; CHAIN FATTY-ACID; CULTURE SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; RUMEN EPITHELIAL ADAPTATION; TRACT BARRIER FUNCTION; ELSDENII NCIMB 41125; GRAIN DIET AFFECTS; LOW FEED-INTAKE; YEAST CULTURE;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731118001921
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Due to their high energy requirements, high-yielding dairy cows receive high-grain diets. This commonly jeopardises their gastrointestinal health by causing subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) and hindgut acidosis. These disorders can disrupt nutrient utilisations, impair the functionalities of gastrointestinal microbiota, and reduce the absorptive and barrier capacities of gastrointestinal epithelia. They can also trigger inflammatory responses. The symptoms of SARA are not only due to a depressed rumen pH. Hence, the diagnosis of this disorder based solely on reticulo-rumen pH values is inaccurate. An accurate diagnosis requires a combination of clinical examinations of cows, including blood, milk, urine and faeces parameters, as well as analyses of herd management and feed quality, including the dietary contents of NDF, starch and physical effective NDF. Grain-induced SARA increases acidity and shifts availabilities of substrates for microorganisms in the reticulo-rumen and hindgut and can result in a dysbiotic microbiota that are characterised by low richness, diversity and functionality. Also, amylolytic microorganisms become more dominant at the expense of proteolytic and fibrolytic ones. Opportunistic microorganisms can take advantage of newly available niches, which, combined with reduced functionalities of epithelia, can contribute to an overall reduction in nutrient utilisation and increasing endotoxins and pathogens in digesta and faeces. The reduced barrier function of epithelia increases translocation of these endotoxins and other immunogenic compounds out of the digestive tract, which may be the cause of inflammations. This needs to be confirmed by determining the toxicity of these compounds. Cows differ in their susceptibility to poor gastrointestinal health, due to variations in genetics, feeding history, diet adaptation, gastrointestinal microbiota, metabolic adaptation, stress and infections. These differences may also offer opportunities for the management of gastrointestinal health. Strategies to prevent SARA include balancing the diet for physical effective fibre, non-fibre carbohydrates and starch, managing the different fractions of non-fibre carbohydrates, and consideration of the type and processing of grain and forage digestibility. Gastrointestinal health disorders due to high grain feeding may be attenuated by a variety of feed supplements and additives, including buffers, antibiotics, probiotics/direct fed microbials and yeast products. However, the efficacy of strategies to prevent these disorders must be improved. This requires a better understanding of the mechanisms through which these strategies affect the functionality of gastrointestinal microbiota and epithelia, and the immunity, inflammation and 'gastrointestinal-health robustness' of cows. More representative models to induce SARA are also needed.
引用
收藏
页码:S399 / S418
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ROBOTIC MILKING OF DAIRY COWS: A REVIEW
    Maculan, Renata
    Lopes, Marcos Aurelio
    BOLETIM DE INDUSTRIA ANIMAL, 2016, 73 (01): : 80 - 87
  • [22] Relationship between gastrointestinal dysbiosis and Clostridium botulinum in dairy cows
    Krueger, Monika
    Shehata, Awad A.
    Grosse-Herrenthey, Anke
    Staender, Norman
    Schroedl, Wieland
    ANAEROBE, 2014, 27 : 100 - 105
  • [23] Impact of animal health on reproduction of dairy cows
    Santos, J. E. P.
    Ribeiro, E. S.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION, 2014, 11 (03) : 254 - 269
  • [24] The role of mycotoxins in the health and performance of dairy cows
    Fink-Gremmels, J.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 176 (01): : 84 - 92
  • [25] Feeding dairy cows for improved metabolism and health
    Martins, Leoni F.
    Wasson, Derek E.
    Hristov, Alexander N.
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2022, 12 (05) : 29 - 36
  • [26] A review of the nutritional value of lupins for dairy cows
    White, C. L.
    Staines, V. E.
    Staines, M. Vh.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2007, 58 (03): : 185 - 202
  • [27] Prevalence of lameness in dairy cows: A literature review
    Thomsen, Peter T.
    Shearer, Jan K.
    Houe, Hans
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2023, 295
  • [28] Selenium requirements in grazing dairy cows: a review
    Hendriks, S. J.
    Laven, R. A.
    NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2020, 68 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [29] Automation of oestrus detection in dairy cows: a review
    Firk, R
    Stamer, E
    Junge, W
    Krieter, J
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2002, 75 (03): : 219 - 232
  • [30] MAXIMUM FORAGE FOR DAIRY-COWS - REVIEW
    WANGSNESS, PJ
    MULLER, LD
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1981, 64 (01) : 1 - 13