Dynamic Task Scheduling for Human-Robot Collaboration

被引:10
|
作者
Alirezazadeh, Saeid [1 ]
Alexandre, Luis A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Beira Interior, C4 UBIMed, P-6201001 Covilha, Portugal
[2] Univ Beira Interior, NOVA LINCS, P-6201001 Covilha, Portugal
关键词
Human-robot collaboration; performance evaluation and benchmarking; planning; scheduling and coordination; WORKING;
D O I
10.1109/LRA.2022.3188906
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In human-robot collaboration systems, the human-robot team works together to complete all tasks of the assigned job. Tasks' precedence order is a factor that determines which task should be completed first. A human agent has an expected performance on each task, but the actual performance of the human agent on a task may differ from the expected performance at different times. Therefore, it is also necessary to monitor the human agent so that the task can be transferred to or from the robot when the actual performance of the human agent is worse or better than the expected performance. We propose an architecture for dynamic task allocation and scheduling in a collaborative system. The method is to first identify the group of tasks that should be executed first based on the precedence order of tasks. After obtaining this group of prioritized tasks, we use the quality metric (a numerical value that indicates which agent is better at completing the task) to determine which agent should be assigned each of the tasks. Finally, real-time human agent monitoring is used to detect performance changes in the human agent so that tasks can be transferred from one agent to another. All of these processes are performed automatically without the need for a human agent to schedule or reschedule. We have validated the effectiveness of the architecture through several experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:8699 / 8704
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved Task Planning through Failure Anticipation in Human-Robot Collaboration
    Izquierdo-Badiola, Silvia
    Canal, Gerard
    Rizzo, Carlos
    Alenya, Guillem
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, ICRA 2022, 2022, : 7875 - 7880
  • [32] Cognitive Interaction Analysis in Human-Robot Collaboration Using an Assembly Task
    Chacon, Alejandro
    Ponsa, Pere
    Angulo, Cecilio
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [33] Characterizing Task-Based Human-Robot Collaboration Safety in Manufacturing
    Marvel, Jeremy A.
    Falco, Joe
    Marstio, Ilari
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2015, 45 (02): : 260 - 275
  • [34] Autonomously Constructing Hierarchical Task Networks for Planning and Human-Robot Collaboration
    Hayes, Bradley
    Scassellati, Brian
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2016, : 5469 - 5476
  • [35] Dynamic Reconfiguration of Mission Parameters in Underwater Human-Robot Collaboration
    Islam, Md Jahidul
    Ho, Marc
    Sattar, Junaed
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2018, : 6212 - 6219
  • [36] Human-Robot Collaboration: A Survey
    Chandrasekaran, Balasubramaniyan
    Conrad, James M.
    [J]. IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2015, 2015,
  • [37] Task allocation model for human-robot collaboration with variable cobot speed
    Maurizio Faccio
    Irene Granata
    Riccardo Minto
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2024, 35 : 793 - 806
  • [38] Learning Action Duration and Synergy in Task Planning for Human-Robot Collaboration
    Sandrini, Samuele
    Faroni, Marco
    Pedrocchi, Nicola
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORY AUTOMATION (ETFA), 2022,
  • [39] Human-robot collaboration: A survey
    Bauer, Andrea
    Wollherr, Dirk
    Buss, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANOID ROBOTICS, 2008, 5 (01) : 47 - 66
  • [40] Role Switching in Task-Oriented Multimodal Human-Robot Collaboration
    Monaikul, Natawut
    Abbasi, Bahareh
    Rysbek, Zhanibek
    Di Eugenio, Barbara
    Zefran, Milos
    [J]. 2020 29TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2020, : 1150 - 1156