Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Audio, Visual, or Audiovisual Gait Biofeedback on Propulsive Force Generation in Able-Bodied and Post-stroke Individuals

被引:19
|
作者
Liu, Justin [1 ]
Kim, Hyun Bin [2 ]
Wolf, Steven L. [1 ,3 ]
Kesar, Trisha M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Div Phys Therapy, 1441 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Emory Coll Arts & Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Atlanta Vet Affair Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Visual & Neurocognit Rehabil, Decatur, GA USA
关键词
Biofeedback; Gait biomechanics; Post-stroke hemiparesis; Gait training; Paretic propulsion; ELECTRO-MYOGRAPHIC BIOFEEDBACK; GROUND REACTION FORCES; PARETIC PROPULSION; WALKING FUNCTION; STROKE; SPEED; PERFORMANCE; TREADMILL; DISTANCE; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1007/s10484-020-09464-1
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Real-time biofeedback is a promising post-stroke gait rehabilitation strategy that can target specific gait deficits preferentially in the paretic leg. Our previous work demonstrated that the use of an audiovisual biofeedback interface designed to increase paretic leg propulsion, measured via anterior ground reaction force (AGRF) generation during late stance phase of gait, can induce improvements in peak AGRF production of the targeted and paretic limb of able-bodied and post-stroke individuals, respectively. However, whether different modes of biofeedback, such as visual, auditory, or a combination of both, have differential effects on AGRF generation is unknown. The present study investigated the effects of audio only, visual only, or audiovisual AGRF biofeedback in able-bodied and post-stroke individuals. Seven able-bodied (6 females, 27 +/- 2 years) and nine post-stroke individuals (6 females, 54 +/- 12 years, 42 +/- 26 months post-stroke) completed four 30-s walking trials on a treadmill under 4 conditions: no biofeedback, audio biofeedback, visual biofeedback, or audiovisual biofeedback. Compared to walking without biofeedback, all three biofeedback modes significantly increased peak AGRF in the targeted and paretic leg. There was no significant difference in peak AGRF between the three biofeedback modes. Able-bodied individuals demonstrated greater feedback-induced increase in stride-to-stride variation of AGRF generation during audio biofeedback compared to visual biofeedback; however, similar results were not observed in the post-stroke group. The present findings may inform future development of real-time gait biofeedback interfaces for use in clinical or community environments.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 220
页数:10
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Audio, Visual, or Audiovisual Gait Biofeedback on Propulsive Force Generation in Able-Bodied and Post-stroke Individuals
    Justin Liu
    Hyun Bin Kim
    Steven L. Wolf
    Trisha M. Kesar
    Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 2020, 45 : 211 - 220
  • [2] Gait Profile Score in able-bodied and post-stroke individuals adjusted for the effect of gait speed
    Fukuchi, Claudiane A.
    Duarte, Marcos
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 69 : 40 - 45
  • [3] Immediate improvements in post-stroke gait biomechanics are induced with both real-time limb position and propulsive force biofeedback
    Santucci, Vincent
    Alam, Zahin
    Liu, Justin
    Spencer, Jacob
    Faust, Alec
    Cobb, Aijalon
    Konantz, Joshua
    Eicholtz, Steven
    Wolf, Steven
    Kesar, Trisha M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [4] Immediate improvements in post-stroke gait biomechanics are induced with both real-time limb position and propulsive force biofeedback
    Vincent Santucci
    Zahin Alam
    Justin Liu
    Jacob Spencer
    Alec Faust
    Aijalon Cobb
    Joshua Konantz
    Steven Eicholtz
    Steven Wolf
    Trisha M. Kesar
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20
  • [5] Effects of real-time gait biofeedback on paretic propulsion and gait biomechanics in individuals post-stroke
    Genthe, Katlin
    Schenck, Christopher
    Eicholtz, Steven
    Zajac-Cox, Laura
    Wolf, Steven
    Kesar, Trisha M.
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2018, 25 (03) : 186 - 193