Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment:: Cephalometric and model analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Ciger, S [1 ]
Aksu, M [1 ]
Germeç, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate changes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions treated with cervical headgear and full fixed orthodontic appliances and without extractions. Methods: Lateral cephalograms and dental casts of 18 patients were obtained at the beginning and the end of treatment and at the postretention period. Pretreatment records were taken at 11.9 +/- 2.6 years, and the mean treatment time was 2.8 +/- 1.2 years. All patients were asked to use maxillary and mandibular Hawley retainers for 1 year. The average postretention interval was 5.3 years. Results: The assessment of cephalometric findings showed that maxillary growth was restricted; maxillary incisor inclination, overjet, and overbite were decreased; the mandibular incisors were proclined; and a slight mandibular posterior rotation occurred at the end of treatment. At the postretention period, the maxilla remained stable, the mandible moved anteriorly, and the overjet increased slightly (1.25 mm, P < .01). The dental cast changes indicated that both maxillary and mandibular irregularity index values decreased significantly during treatment but increased after 5 years. Mandibular intercanine width decreased 0.47 mm (P < .01) during the postretention period. Conclusions: The redirection of maxillary growth remained stable in patients with Class II malocclusions treated with cervical headgear and fixed orthodontic appliances and without extractions, but treatment-induced mandibular rotations tended to return to their original patterns. Various dental changes occurred during the postretention period.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 223
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Orthodontic treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion in a patient with achondroplasia
    Ohba, T
    Ohba, Y
    Tenshin, S
    Takano-Yamamoto, T
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1998, 68 (04) : 377 - 382
  • [32] Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
    Rocha, Andrea Damasceno
    Vieira Freire Casteluci, Cleomaria Evelyn
    Carvalho Ferreira, Fernando Pedrin
    Conti, Ana Claudia
    Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues
    Almeida-Pedrin, Renata Rodrigues
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2020, 34
  • [33] Comparison of Skeletal Changes between Female Adolescents and Adults with Hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 Malocclusion after Orthodontic Treatment
    Ding, Yun
    Zhao, Jian Hui
    Deng, Jin Rong
    Wang, Xiu Jing
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 15 (02): : 139 - 144
  • [34] NONEXTRACTION TREATMENT OF SEVERE CLASS-II, DIVISION-2 MALOCCLUSIONS .1.
    ARVYSTAS, MG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1990, 97 (06) : 510 - 521
  • [35] Class II malocclusion division 1: a new classification method by cephalometric analysis
    Perillo, L.
    Padricelli, G.
    Isola, G.
    Femiano, F.
    Chiodini, P.
    Matarese, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2012, 13 (03) : 192 - 196
  • [36] Comparison of surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatment approaches on occlusal and cephalometric outcomes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions
    Daniels, Sheila
    Brady, Patrick
    Daniels, Arya
    Howes, Stacey
    Shin, Kyungsup
    Elangovan, Satheesh
    Allareddy, Veerasathpurush
    PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2017, 18
  • [37] Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental Class II, division 1 malocclusion
    Sayin, MÖ
    Türkkahraman, H
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2005, 75 (04) : 656 - 660
  • [38] Comparison of surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatment approaches on occlusal and cephalometric outcomes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions
    Sheila Daniels
    Patrick Brady
    Arya Daniels
    Stacey Howes
    Kyungsup Shin
    Satheesh Elangovan
    Veerasathpurush Allareddy
    Progress in Orthodontics, 18
  • [39] Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the twin block appliance in class II division 1 malocclusion patients
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    Major, Paul W.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (05) : 876 - 881