Effects of chronic stimulation on auditory nerve survival in ototoxically deafened animals

被引:38
|
作者
Miller, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Kresge Hearing Res Inst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
guinea pig; kitten; chronic stimulation; spiral ganglion cell; cochlear implant; auditory nerve;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00226-4
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
For almost 10 years, chronic stimulation has been known to affect spiral ganglion cell (SGC) survival in the deaf ear. However, the reported effects of chronic stimulation vary across preparations and studies. In this review, the effects of chronic stimulation on the deafened auditory periphery are examined, and variables that may impact on the efficacy of chronic stimulation are identified. The effects of deafening on the unstimulated peripheral and central auditory system are also described, as the deafened, unstimulated system is the canvas upon which stimulation-mediated effects are imposed. Discrepancies in the effects of chronic stimulation across studies may be attributable in large part to the combined effects of the deafening method and the post-deafening delay prior to chronic stimulation, which vary across studies. Emphasis is placed on the need to consider the natural progression of SGC loss following deafening in the absence of chronic stimulation, as the rate of SGC loss almost certainly affects both the efficacy of stimulation? and the impact of any delay between deafening and initiation of stimulation. The differences across preparations complicate direct comparison of protective efficacy of stimulation. At the same timer these differences can be used to our advantage, aiding characterization of the effects of different factors on the efficacy of chronic stimulation as a neuroprotective intervention. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE AORTIC NERVE IN ANIMALS UNDER NEMBUTAL AND CHLORALOSE ANAESTHESIA
    NEIL, E
    REDWOOD, CRM
    SCHWEITZER, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1949, 108 (04): : P8 - P8
  • [42] Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: Relation to neuronal status
    Ramekers, Dyan
    Versnel, Huib
    Strahl, Stefan B.
    Klis, Sjaak F. L.
    Grolman, Wilko
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 321 : 12 - 24
  • [43] Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve
    Zeng, FG
    Galvin, JJ
    Zhang, CY
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 1998, 9 (08) : 1845 - 1848
  • [44] Laser Stimulation of Single Auditory Nerve Fibers
    Littlefield, Philip D.
    Vujanovic, Irena
    Mundi, Jagmeet
    Matic, Agnella Izzo
    Richter, Claus-Peter
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2010, 120 (10): : 2071 - 2082
  • [45] Adaptation of the auditory nerve during electrical stimulation
    Smoorenburg, GF
    Killian, MJP
    [J]. ACUSTICA, 1996, 82 : S125 - S125
  • [46] Stimulation of the human auditory nerve with optical radiation
    Fishman, Andrew
    Winkler, Piotr
    Mierzwinski, Jozef
    Beuth, Wojciech
    Matic, Agnella Izzo
    Siedlecki, Zygmunt
    Teudt, Ingo
    Maier, Hannes
    Richter, Claus-Peter
    [J]. PHOTONS AND NEURONS, 2009, 7180
  • [47] In vivo auditory nerve stimulation with visible light
    Guan, Tian
    Yang, Muqun
    He, Yonghong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE OPTICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2017, 10 (05)
  • [48] RE - ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF AUDITORY NERVE IN MAN
    SHAMBAUG.GE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1966, 84 (01): : 1 - +
  • [49] An improved model of electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve
    Bruce, I
    Irlicht, L
    White, M
    OLeary, S
    Dynes, S
    Javel, E
    Clark, G
    [J]. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 1996, : 125 - 130
  • [50] Tinnitus suppression by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve
    Chang, Janice E.
    Zeng, Fan-Gang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6