The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression:: A cluster-randomized controlled trial

被引:275
|
作者
Loh, Andreas [1 ]
Simon, Daniela
Wills, Celia E.
Kriston, Levente
Niebling, Wilhelm
Haerter, Martin
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Sect Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Michigan State Univ, Coll Nursing, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Primary Care, Freiberg, Germany
关键词
depression; shared decision-making; patient participation; primary care;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.023
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Patient-centred depression care approaches should better address barriers of insufficient patient information and involvement in the treatment decision process. Additional research is needed to test the effect of increased patient participation on outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess, if patient participation in decision-making via a shared decision-making intervention leads to improved treatment adherence, satisfaction, and clinical outcome without increasing consultation time. Methods: Cluster-randomized controlled intervention study based on physician training and patient-centered decision aid compared to usual care in primary care settings in Sadbaden region of Germany. Twenty-three primary care physicians treating 405 patients with newly diagnosed depression were enrolled. Patient involvement was measured with the patient perceived involvement in care scale (PICS) and a patient participation scale (MSH-scale). Patient satisfaction was measured by the CSQ-8 questionnaire. Treatment adherence was evaluated by patient and provider self-report. Depression severity and remission outcomes were assessed with the Brief PHQ-D. Results: Physician facilitation of patient participation improved significantly and to a greater extent in the intervention compared to the control group. There was no intervention effect for depression severity reduction. Doctor facilitation of patient participation, patient-rated involvement, and physician assessment of adherence improved only in the intervention group. Patient satisfaction at post-intervention was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. The consultation time did not differ between groups. Conclusion: A shared decision-making intervention was better than usual care for improving patient participation in treatment decision-making, and patient satisfaction without increasing consultation time. Additional research is needed to model causal linkages in the decision-making process in regard to outcomes. Practice implications: The study results encourage the implementation of patient participation in primary care of depression. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 332
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shared Decision-Making in Cancer Care: Ongoing Process Evaluation of a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Implementation Trial
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Lindig, Anja
    Frerichs, Wiebke
    Hahlweg, Pola
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 43 : 206 - 206
  • [32] Just-in-Time Information Improved Decision-Making in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    McGowan, Jessie
    Hogg, William
    Campbell, Craig
    Rowan, Margo
    PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (11):
  • [33] Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care
    Young, Henry N.
    Bell, Robert A.
    Epstein, Ronald M.
    Feldman, Mitchell D.
    Kravitz, Richard L.
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (13) : 1404 - 1408
  • [34] Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of decision boxes on shared decision-making processes
    Giguere, Anik M. C.
    Labrecque, Michel
    Legare, France
    Grad, Roland
    Cauchon, Michel
    Greenway, Matthew
    Haynes, R. Brian
    Pluye, Pierre
    Syed, Iqra
    Banerjee, Debi
    Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues
    Martin, Melanie
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15
  • [35] Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of decision boxes on shared decision-making processes
    Anik MC Giguere
    Michel Labrecque
    France Légaré
    Roland Grad
    Michel Cauchon
    Matthew Greenway
    R Brian Haynes
    Pierre Pluye
    Iqra Syed
    Debi Banerjee
    Pierre-Hugues Carmichael
    Mélanie Martin
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15
  • [36] Dealing with the Lack of Time for Detailed Shared Decision-making in Primary Care: Everyday Shared Decision-making
    Caverly, Tanner J.
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (10) : 3045 - 3049
  • [37] Dealing with the Lack of Time for Detailed Shared Decision-making in Primary Care: Everyday Shared Decision-making
    Tanner J. Caverly
    Rodney A. Hayward
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 3045 - 3049
  • [38] Implementation of an Oral Care Protocol for Primary Diabetes Care: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
    Verhulst, Martijn J. L.
    Teeuw, Wijnand J.
    Gerdes, Victor E. A.
    Loos, Bruno G.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (03) : 197 - 206
  • [39] Computerized clinical decision support system for diabetes in primary care does not improve quality of care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Annemie Heselmans
    Nicolas Delvaux
    Annouschka Laenen
    Stijn Van de Velde
    Dirk Ramaekers
    Ilkka Kunnamo
    Bert Aertgeerts
    Implementation Science, 15
  • [40] Computerized clinical decision support system for diabetes in primary care does not improve quality of care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Heselmans, Annemie
    Delvaux, Nicolas
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Van de Velde, Stijn
    Ramaekers, Dirk
    Kunnamo, Ilkka
    Aertgeerts, Bert
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (01)