Significance of extensive hyperkeratosis on cervical/vaginal smears

被引:2
|
作者
Williamson, BA
DeFrias, D
Gunn, R
Tarjan, G
Nayar, R
机构
[1] NW Mem Hosp, Dept Pathol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Cytopathol, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] NW Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Papanicolaou smear; cervix diseases; cervix neoplasms; hyperkeratosis;
D O I
10.1159/000326600
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the significance of reporting hyperkeratosis on cervical/vaginal (CV) smears. STUDY DESIGN: Cases diagnosed with extensive hyperkeratosis (E-HK) and without prior or concurrent history of neoplasia, squamous intraepithelial lesion or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) were retrieved from our files for the period January 1994-August 2001. E-HK is defined in our practice as patches of anucleated squames with irregular, angulated edges present in at least 5 low-power (10 x eyepiece and 10 x objective) fields on a conventional CV smear. On liquid-based preparations, we use 3 low-power fields. Only cases with a follow-up CV smear and/or cervical biopsy (CB) were selected. RESULTS: Among 328 cases of E-HK, 138 patients met the study selection criteria. Eighty-one cases had negative CV smears and/or CB, 17 (12.3%) patients had persistent E-HK, and a subsequent diagnosis of ASCUS or higher was made in 40 patients (28.9%). Among the 40 cases with subsequent abnormalities, 13 (9.4%) were diagnosed with ASCUS, 24 (17.4%) with HP V or dysplasia, and 3 (2.1%) with malignancy. CONCLUSION: While isolated, anucleate squames may have no clinical importance in patient management, E-HK can be a significant marker of underlying neoplastic disease. This should be kept in mind as one decides how to report CV cytology based on 2001 Bethesda System recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 752
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multinucleated giant cells significance in cervico-vaginal smears
    Sassi, A.
    Bacha, D.
    Ben Slama, S.
    Ben Amor, A.
    Lahmar, A.
    Bouraoui, S.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S308 - S308
  • [42] Prevalence, identification and significance of fiber contaminants in cervical smears
    vanHoeven, KH
    Bertolini, PK
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1996, 40 (03) : 489 - 495
  • [43] The significance of psammoma bodies in screening cervical cytologic smears
    Muntz, HG
    Goff, BA
    McGonigle, K
    Isacson, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) : 1609 - 1612
  • [44] Atypical reparative change on cervical/vaginal smears may be associated with dysplasia
    Rimm, DL
    Gmitro, S
    Frable, WJ
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1996, 14 (04) : 374 - 379
  • [45] Small cells in cervical-vaginal smears of patients treated with tamoxifen
    Opjorden, SL
    Caudill, JL
    Humphrey, SK
    Salomao, DR
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2001, 93 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [46] Telecytology: Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of cervical-vaginal smears
    Alli, PM
    Ollayos, CW
    Thompson, LD
    Kapadia, I
    Butler, DR
    Williams, BH
    Rosenthal, DL
    O'Leary, TJ
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (12) : 1318 - 1322
  • [47] Cytologic manifestations of advanced endometrial adenocarcinomas in cervical-vaginal smears
    Akin, MRM
    Nguyen, GK
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 20 (02) : 108 - 110
  • [48] Are vaginal swabs comparable to cervical smears for human papillomavirus DNA testing?
    Coorevits, Liselotte
    Traen, Ans
    Binge, Luc
    Van Dorpe, Jo
    Praet, Marleen
    Boelens, Jerina
    Padalko, Elizaveta
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (01)
  • [49] CYTOPATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF METASTATIC CANCER BY CERVICAL AND VAGINAL SMEARS WITH REPORT OF A CASE
    BHAGAVAN, BS
    WEINBERG, T
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1969, 13 (07) : 377 - &
  • [50] RELATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF CELLULAR INDEXES IN PRETREATMENT VAGINAL SMEARS OF CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX
    GUPTA, S
    GUPTA, YN
    SANYAL, B
    GUPTA, IM
    KHANNA, S
    RANI, A
    SINGAPORE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1981, 12 (03) : 46 - 50