Propensity score analysis of early and late outcome after redo off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

被引:19
|
作者
Vohra, Hunaid A. [1 ]
Bahrami, Toufan [1 ]
Farid, Shakil [1 ]
Mafi, Ahmed [1 ]
Dreyfus, Gilles [1 ]
Amrani, Mohammad [1 ]
Gaer, Jullien A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harefield Hosp, Royal Brompton & HArefield NHS Trust, Dept Cardiac Surg, Harefield UB9 6JH, Middx, England
关键词
oncab; opcab; redo;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.11.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare early and late results of redo-CABG with (redo-ONCAB) and without (redo-OPCAB) cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: From April 2001 to September 2006 redo-CABG was performed in 110 patients (redo-ONCAB = 50 and redo-CPCAB = 60). Applying the propensity score, 43 OPCAB patients were matched with 43 ONCAB patients. The mean EuroScore was 5 +/- 4.7 and 5 +/- 3.4 for redo-ONCAB and redo-OPCAB, respectively (p = 0.5). The number of diseased coronary arteries was 3 +/- 0.5 and 2 +/- 0.8 in redo-ONCAB and redo-OPCAB, respectively (p < 0.01). Results: Twelve patients underwent CPCAB through anterior thoracotomy while the rest of the patients (n = 74) underwent median sternotomy. Mean number of grafts performed was 3 +/- 0.8 in redo-ONCAB and 2 +/- 0.6 in redo-OPCAB (p < 0.05). The need for postoperative insertion of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was higher (p = 0.02) in redo-ONCAB (n = 9, 21%) than redo-OPCAB (n = 1, 2%). The duration of postoperative ventilation was 55 +/- 98.7 h for redo-ONCAB and 10 +/- 12.8 h for redo-OPCAB (p = 0.008). No differences were found in the incidence of other postoperative complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.9% for redo-ONCAB (n = 3) and 2.3% redo-OPCAB (n = 1; p = NS). Mean follow-up for redo-ONCAB was 30 +/- 21.3 months (range 0.1-63 months) and that of redo-CPCAB was 37 +/- 19.2 months (0.1-62.5 months). Actuarial survival at 5 years was 87 +/- 5.5% for redo-ONCAB and 95 +/- 3.2% for redo-OPCAB (p = 0.17). Event-free survival was 71 +/- 8.0% for redo-CNCAB and 78 +/- 7.2% for redo-OPCAB (p = 0.32). Conclusion: OPCAB is an acceptable strategy in selected patients requiring redo-CABG. Employing a strategy of CPCAB for those patients with 2 or fewer lesions and ONCAB for those with more diffuse disease, redo-OPCAB and redo-ONCAB have similar early and [ate outcomes. (c) 2007 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The influence of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on hemorheological parameters
    Papp, J.
    Toth, A.
    Sandor, B.
    Kiss, R.
    Rabai, M.
    Kenyeres, P.
    Juricskay, I.
    Kesmarky, G.
    Szabados, S.
    Toth, K.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2011, 49 (1-4) : 331 - 346
  • [42] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients at 30 days: a propensity score matching study
    Wang, Chen
    Jiang, Yefan
    Wang, Qingpeng
    Wang, Dashuai
    Jiang, Xionggang
    Dong, Nianguo
    Chen, Si
    Chen, Xinzhong
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 100 (1184) : 414 - 420
  • [43] OFF-PUMP VERSUS ON-PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING: WHO BENEFITS?
    Pawliszak, Wojciech
    Kowalewski, Mariusz
    Anisimowicz, Lech
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (06): : 1666 - 1668
  • [44] Effect of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on renal function
    Celik, JB
    Gormus, N
    Topal, A
    Okesli, S
    Solak, H
    RENAL FAILURE, 2005, 27 (02) : 183 - 188
  • [45] Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting at 30 Days
    Lamy, Andre
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
    Taggart, David P.
    Hu, Shengshou
    Paolasso, Ernesto
    Straka, Zbynek
    Piegas, Leopoldo S.
    Akar, Ahmet Ruchan
    Jain, Anil R.
    Noiseux, Nicolas
    Padmanabhan, Chandrasekar
    Bahamondes, Juan-Carlos
    Novick, Richard J.
    Vaijyanath, Prashant
    Reddy, Sukesh
    Tao, Liang
    Olavegogeascoechea, Pablo A.
    Airan, Balram
    Sulling, Toomas-Andres
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    Ou, Yongning
    Ng, Jennifer
    Chrolavicius, Susan
    Yusuf, Salim
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (16): : 1489 - 1497
  • [46] Results of On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reply
    Chu, Danny
    Bakaeen, Faisal G.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 90 (01): : 358 - 359
  • [47] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting—a surreal controversy?
    Kundu A.
    Yadava O.P.
    Taggart D.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 34 (Suppl 3) : 266 - 271
  • [48] Long-Term Survival After On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Squiers, John J.
    Schaffer, Justin M.
    Banwait, Jasjit K.
    Ryan, William H.
    Mack, Michael J.
    DiMaio, J. Michael
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 113 (06): : 1943 - 1952
  • [49] Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results
    Ishida M.
    Kobayashi J.
    Tagusari O.
    Bando K.
    Niwaya K.
    Nakajima H.
    Fukushima S.
    Kitamura S.
    The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004, 52 (5) : 240 - 246
  • [50] Adipokines in patients undergoing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
    Nemeth, A.
    Cziraki, A.
    Sulyok, E.
    Szabados, S.
    Horvath, I.
    Nasri, A.
    Rauh, M.
    Rascher, W.
    CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2014, 103