Anaerobic digestion of whole stillage from dry-grind corn ethanol plant under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions

被引:49
|
作者
Eskicioglu, Cigdem [1 ]
Kennedy, Kevin J. [1 ]
Marin, Juan [1 ]
Strehler, Benjamin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Civil Engn, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] CH Four Biogas Inc, Ottawa, ON K2C 3N6, Canada
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Corn whole stillage; Bioethanol; Mesophilic; Thermophilic; METHANE PRODUCTION; WASTE-WATER; BIOETHANOL; CROPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.061
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion of whole stillage from a dry-grind corn-based ethanol plant was evaluated by batch and continuous-flow digesters under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. At whole corn stillage concentrations of 6348 to 50,786 mg total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD)/L, at standard temperature (0 degrees C) and pressure (1 atm), preliminary biochemical methane potential assays produced 88 +/- 8 L (49 +/- 5 L CH4) and 96 +/- 19 L (65 +/- 14 L CH4) biogas per L stillage from mesophilic and thermophilic digesters, respectively. Continuous-flow studies for the full-strength stillage (TCOD = 254 g/L) at organic loadings of 4.25, 6.30 and 9.05 g TCOD/L days indicated unstable performance for the thermophilic digester. Among the sludge retention times (SRTs) of 60,45 and 30 days tested, the mesophilic digestion was successful only at 60 days-SRT which does not represent a practical operation time for a large scale bioethanol plant. Future laboratory studies will focus on different reactor configurations to reduce the SRT needed in the digesters. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1086
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Dry co-digestion of sewage sludge and rice straw under mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic conditions
    Xiangqian Chu
    Guangxue Wu
    Jiaquan Wang
    Zhen-Hu Hu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22 : 20143 - 20153
  • [12] Anaerobic Digestion of Wheatgrass Under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions and Different Inoculum Sources
    Silva, Igor M. O.
    Dionisi, Davide
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMASS (ICONBM 2016), 2016, 50 : 19 - 24
  • [13] Anaerobic digestion of maize and cellulose under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions - A comparative study
    Golkowska, Katarzyna
    Greger, Manfred
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 56 : 545 - 554
  • [14] Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of bioethanol plant whole stillage in batch mode
    Eskicioglu, Cigdem
    Ghorbani, Maryam
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 46 (08) : 1682 - 1687
  • [15] Ethanol Production from Modified and Conventional Dry-Grind Processes Using Different Corn Types
    Khullar, Esha
    Sall, Erik D.
    Rausch, Kent D.
    Tumbleson, M. E.
    Singh, Vijay
    CEREAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 86 (06) : 616 - 622
  • [16] Anaerobic digestion of mixed microalgae cultivated in secondary effluent under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions
    Cea-Barcia, Glenda
    Moreno, Gloria
    Buitron, German
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 72 (08) : 1398 - 1403
  • [17] Comparison of microbial communities during the anaerobic digestion of Gracilaria under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions
    Aqil Azizi
    Wonduck Kim
    Jung Hyun Lee
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 32
  • [18] Compositional Analysis of Defatted Syrup from a Corn Ethanol Dry-Grind Process as a Feedstock for Biobased Products
    Adom, Felix
    Fan, Jiqing
    Davis, Jamie
    Dunn, Paul
    Shonnard, David
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2014, 2 (05): : 1139 - 1146
  • [19] Comparison of microbial communities during the anaerobic digestion of Gracilaria under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions
    Azizi, Aqil
    Kim, Wonduck
    Lee, Jung Hyun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 32 (10):
  • [20] Anaerobic Digestion of Kraft Pulp Mill Foul Condensate Under Thermophilic and Mesophilic Conditions
    Hayes, Alexander C.
    Nesbo, Camilla
    Edwards, Elizabeth A.
    Jenson, Earl
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2022, 39 (06) : 573 - 583