Culture, essentialism, and agency: Are individuals universally believed to be more real entities than groups?

被引:77
|
作者
Kashima, Y [1 ]
Kashima, E
Chiu, CY
Farsides, T
Gelfand, M
Hong, YY
Kim, U
Strack, F
Werth, L
Yuki, M
Yzerbyt, V
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Psychol, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[4] Univ Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
[5] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[6] Univ Wurzburg, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[7] Hokkaido Univ, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060, Japan
[8] Catholic Univ Louvain, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1002/ejsp.237
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Are human individuals universally seen to be more real entities (or more entitative, to use Campbell's, 1958, term) than social groups? Although the individual may be seen to be more entitative than social groups in the West, it is unclear whether this is the case in other cultures, especially, in East Asia. Two aspects of perceived entitativity are distinguished: psychological essentialism (belief in the presence of essence-like unchangeable properties) and agency (perception that a social entity is an agent), and examined for four social targets (individual, family, friendship group, and society) in three English-speaking cultures (Australia, UK, and USA). three East Asian cultures (Hong Kong, Japan, and Korea), and two continental European cultures (Belgium and Germany). In all cultures, the individual person was seen to possess essence-like unchangeable characteristics more than social groups (i.e. essentialized). As for agency, the individual person was seen to be more agentic than groups in Western cultures, but both individuals and groups were conferred an equal level of agency in East Asia. Individuals may be universally more essentialized than friendship groups and societies, but not always seen to be more agentic, than social groups. Implications of the results for conceptions of individualism and collectivism are discussed. Copyright (c) 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 169
页数:23
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] ARE GROUPS MORE AGGRESSIVE THAN INDIVIDUALS
    RABBIE, JM
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 35 (DEC): : A88 - A89
  • [2] Are groups more (or less) consistent than individuals?
    Bone, J
    Hey, J
    Suckling, J
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 18 (01) : 63 - 81
  • [3] Are Groups More (or Less) Consistent Than Individuals?
    John Bone
    John Hey
    John Suckling
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1999, 18 : 63 - 81
  • [4] Do groups think more efficiently than individuals?
    Watson, GB
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1928, 23 : 328 - 336
  • [5] Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups
    Kugler, Tamar
    Kausel, Edgar E.
    Kocher, Martin G.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 3 (04) : 471 - 482
  • [6] An Exploration of Deception Detection: Are Groups More Effective Than Individuals?
    McHaney, Roger
    George, Joey F.
    Gupta, Manjul
    COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2018, 45 (08) : 1103 - 1121
  • [7] Why do groups cooperate more than individuals to reduce risks?
    Gong, Min
    Baron, Jonathan
    Kunreuther, Howard
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2013, 75 (01) : 101 - 116
  • [8] Why do groups cooperate more than individuals to reduce risks?
    Min Gong
    Jonathan Baron
    Howard Kunreuther
    Theory and Decision, 2013, 75 : 101 - 116
  • [9] When groups are more competitive than individuals: The domain of the discontinuity effect
    Schopler, J
    Insko, CA
    Wieselquist, J
    Pemberton, M
    Witcher, B
    Kozar, R
    Roddenberry, C
    Wildschut, T
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (04) : 632 - 644
  • [10] Structured groups make more accurate veracity judgements than individuals
    Hamlin, Iain
    Bolger, Fergus
    Vasilichi, Alexandrina
    Belton, Ian
    Crawford, Megan M.
    Sissons, Aileen
    Luka, Courtney Taylor Browne
    Wright, George
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 35 (06) : 1600 - 1607