Foot placement modifies kinematics and kinetics during drop jumping

被引:3
|
作者
Kovács, I
Tihanyi, J
Devita, P
Rácz, L
Barrier, J
Hortobagyi, T
机构
[1] Hungarian Univ Phys Educ, Dept Biomech, H-1123 Budapest, Hungary
[2] E Carolina Univ, Biomech Lab, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Sch Hlth & Human Performance, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
来源
关键词
biomechanics; motor control; impact forces; landing; foot strike; hip; knee; ankle joints; electromyography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Sprinting, bouncing, and spontaneous landings are associated with a forefoot contact whereas walking, running, and jumping are associated with heel-toe foot placement. Because such foot placement strategies influence landing mechanics or the ensuing performance, the purpose of this work was to compare lower extremity kinematics and kinetics and muscle activation patterns between drop vertical jumps performed with heel-toe (HTL) and forefoot (FFL) landings, Methods: Ten healthy male university students performed two types of drop jump from a 0.4-m high box placed 1.0-m from the center of the force plate. They were instructed to either land first on the ball of the feet without the heels touching the ground during the subsequent vertical jump, i.e., forefoot landing jump (En), or to land on the heels followed by depression of the metatarsals, i.e., heel-toe landing jump (HTL). Three successfully performed trials per jump type were included in the analysis. The criteria for selection of the correct jumps was proper foot position at contact as judged from video records and the shape of force-time curve. Results: The first peak and second peak determined from the vertical force-time curves were 3.4 times greater and 1.4 times lower for HTL compared with those with FFL (P < 0.05). In the flexion phase of HTL, the hip and knee joints contributed 40% and 45% to the total torque, whereas during Fn the greatest torque contributions were 37% for both the knee and ankle joints. During the extension phase, the greatest torque contributions to the total torque were 41% and 45% by the knee and ankle joints during HTL and 34% and 55% during FFL. During the flexion phase, power production was 20% greater (P < 0.05) in HTL than in Fn, whereas during the extension phase power production was 40% greater in FFL than in HTL. In the flexion phase of HTL the hip and knee joints produced the greatest power, and during the extension phase the knee and ankle joints produced the greatest power. In contrast, during both the flexion and extension phases of Fn, the knee and ankle joints produced the greatest power. The EMG activity of gluteus, vastus lateralis, and plantar flexor muscles was similar between HTL and FFL in most cases except For the greater vastus lateralis EMG activity during precontact phase in HTL than in FFL and the greater gastrocnemius activity in Fn than in HTL. Conclusion: Foot placement strategy modifies the individual joint contributions to the total power during drop jumping.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 716
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The influence of shoe drop on the kinematics and kinetics of children tennis players
    Herbaut, Alexis
    Chavet, Pascale
    Roux, Maxime
    Gueguen, Nils
    Gillet, Christophe
    Barbier, Franck
    Simoneau-Buessinger, Emilie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2016, 16 (08) : 1121 - 1129
  • [32] A MODEL OF FOOT PLACEMENT DURING GAIT
    REDFERN, MS
    SCHUMANN, T
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1994, 27 (11) : 1339 - 1346
  • [33] The association of dorsiflexion flexibility on knee kinematics and kinetics during a drop vertical jump in healthy female athletes
    Malloy, Philip
    Morgan, Alexander
    Meinerz, Carolyn
    Geiser, Christopher
    Kipp, Kristof
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (12) : 3550 - 3555
  • [34] Does lower extremity alignment during normal stance predict lower limb kinematics and kinetics during drop landings?
    Mark G.L. Sayers
    Robert L. Buhmann
    Tyler J. Collings
    Daniel B. Mellifont
    Max C. Stuelcken
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 15
  • [35] Does lower extremity alignment during normal stance predict lower limb kinematics and kinetics during drop landings?
    Sayers, Mark G. L.
    Buhmann, Robert L.
    Collings, Tyler J.
    Mellifont, Daniel B.
    Stuelcken, Max C.
    BMC SPORTS SCIENCE MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [36] KINEMATICS OF HORSE AND RIDER INTERACTION DURING SIMULATED HORSE JUMPING
    Nemecek, Petr
    Cabell, Lee
    7TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON KINESIOLOGY: FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED KINESIOLOGY - STEPS FORWARD, 2014, : 181 - 186
  • [37] Decoupling of muscle shortening and joint kinematics during frog jumping
    Astley, H. C.
    Roberts, T. J.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 50 : E5 - E5
  • [38] The association of dorsiflexion flexibility on knee kinematics and kinetics during a drop vertical jump in healthy female athletes
    Philip Malloy
    Alexander Morgan
    Carolyn Meinerz
    Christopher Geiser
    Kristof Kipp
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2015, 23 : 3550 - 3555
  • [39] Decoupling of muscle shortening and joint kinematics during frog jumping
    Astley, Henry C.
    Roberts, Thomas J.
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 153A (02): : S128 - S128
  • [40] Effects of Zero-Drop Shoes on Knee Joint Kinematics & Kinetics During the Barbell Back Squat
    Thorsen, Tanner
    Cummings, Chris
    Standifird, Tyler
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 389 - 390