Foot placement modifies kinematics and kinetics during drop jumping

被引:3
|
作者
Kovács, I
Tihanyi, J
Devita, P
Rácz, L
Barrier, J
Hortobagyi, T
机构
[1] Hungarian Univ Phys Educ, Dept Biomech, H-1123 Budapest, Hungary
[2] E Carolina Univ, Biomech Lab, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Sch Hlth & Human Performance, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
来源
关键词
biomechanics; motor control; impact forces; landing; foot strike; hip; knee; ankle joints; electromyography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Sprinting, bouncing, and spontaneous landings are associated with a forefoot contact whereas walking, running, and jumping are associated with heel-toe foot placement. Because such foot placement strategies influence landing mechanics or the ensuing performance, the purpose of this work was to compare lower extremity kinematics and kinetics and muscle activation patterns between drop vertical jumps performed with heel-toe (HTL) and forefoot (FFL) landings, Methods: Ten healthy male university students performed two types of drop jump from a 0.4-m high box placed 1.0-m from the center of the force plate. They were instructed to either land first on the ball of the feet without the heels touching the ground during the subsequent vertical jump, i.e., forefoot landing jump (En), or to land on the heels followed by depression of the metatarsals, i.e., heel-toe landing jump (HTL). Three successfully performed trials per jump type were included in the analysis. The criteria for selection of the correct jumps was proper foot position at contact as judged from video records and the shape of force-time curve. Results: The first peak and second peak determined from the vertical force-time curves were 3.4 times greater and 1.4 times lower for HTL compared with those with FFL (P < 0.05). In the flexion phase of HTL, the hip and knee joints contributed 40% and 45% to the total torque, whereas during Fn the greatest torque contributions were 37% for both the knee and ankle joints. During the extension phase, the greatest torque contributions to the total torque were 41% and 45% by the knee and ankle joints during HTL and 34% and 55% during FFL. During the flexion phase, power production was 20% greater (P < 0.05) in HTL than in Fn, whereas during the extension phase power production was 40% greater in FFL than in HTL. In the flexion phase of HTL the hip and knee joints produced the greatest power, and during the extension phase the knee and ankle joints produced the greatest power. In contrast, during both the flexion and extension phases of Fn, the knee and ankle joints produced the greatest power. The EMG activity of gluteus, vastus lateralis, and plantar flexor muscles was similar between HTL and FFL in most cases except For the greater vastus lateralis EMG activity during precontact phase in HTL than in FFL and the greater gastrocnemius activity in Fn than in HTL. Conclusion: Foot placement strategy modifies the individual joint contributions to the total power during drop jumping.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 716
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sex differences in the kinematics and kinetics of the foot and plantar aponeurosis during drop-jump
    Matsumoto, Yuka
    Ogihara, Naomichi
    Kosuge, Sachiko
    Hanawa, Hiroki
    Kokubun, Takanori
    Kanemura, Naohiko
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [2] Sex differences in the kinematics and kinetics of the foot and plantar aponeurosis during drop-jump
    Yuka Matsumoto
    Naomichi Ogihara
    Sachiko Kosuge
    Hiroki Hanawa
    Takanori Kokubun
    Naohiko Kanemura
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [3] Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait
    MacWilliams, BA
    Cowley, M
    Nicholson, DE
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2003, 17 (03) : 214 - 224
  • [4] Comparison of lower limb kinetics, kinematics and muscle activation during drop jumping under shod and barefoot conditions
    Koyama, Keiji
    Yamauchi, Junichiro
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 69 : 47 - 53
  • [5] Kinetics and kinematics after the Bridle procedure for treatment of traumatic foot drop
    Hastings, Mary K.
    Sinacore, David R.
    Woodburn, James
    Paxton, E. Scott
    Klein, Sandra E.
    McCormick, Jeremy J.
    Bohnert, Kathryn L.
    Beckert, Krista S.
    Stein, Michelle L.
    Strube, Michael J.
    Johnson, Jeffrey E.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2013, 28 (05) : 555 - 561
  • [6] The kinematics and kinetics of grey squirrel jumping
    Snarey, Rebecca A.
    Spence, Andrew
    Wilson, Alan
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 153A (02): : S130 - S130
  • [7] Lower Limb Kinetics and Kinematics during Two Different Jumping Methods
    Shu, Yang
    Sun, Dong
    Hu, Qiuli
    Zhang, Yan
    Li, Jianshe
    Gu, Yaodong
    JOURNAL OF BIOMIMETICS BIOMATERIALS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 22 : 29 - 35
  • [8] KINETICS AND KINEMATICS OF THE FOOT-GROUND INTERFACE DURING THE GOLF SWING
    WILLIAMS, KR
    CAVANAGH, PR
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1980, 12 (02): : 96 - 96
  • [9] Influence Of Back Foot Orientation On Kinetics And Kinematics During Baseball Pitching
    Bonaker, Rebecca
    Aguinaldo, Arnel
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2021, 53 (08): : 49 - 49
  • [10] Foot orthotics affect lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during running
    Mündermann, A
    Nigg, BM
    Humble, RN
    Stefanyshyn, DJ
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 18 (03) : 254 - 262