Policy uncertainty and the optimal investment decisions of second-generation biofuel producers

被引:14
|
作者
Markel, Evan [1 ]
Sims, Charles [2 ]
English, Burton C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ernst & Young LLP, London, England
[2] Univ Tennessee, Howard H Baker Jr Ctr Publ Policy, Dept Econ, 1640 Cumberland Ave, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Option value; Renewable identification numbers; Renewable fuel standard; Tax incentives;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.09.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Uncertainty has been cited as one possible explanation for the lackluster performance of the Renewable Fuel Standard, which was enacted to encourage investment in the production of advanced biofuel. The unpredictability of conventional fuel markets makes the revenues and costs associated with biofuel production uncertain. In addition, policy uncertainty, in the form of annual revisions and adjustments to the program, make the cost of complying with the Renewable Fuel Standard uncertain. This paper is the first to decompose the aggregate uncertainty facing biofuel producers and isolate the effect of fuel market uncertainty and policy uncertainty on the decision to enter and exit the biofuel market. Results indicate that the uncertainty in the conventional fuel markets and the uncertainty in status of the Renewable Fuel Standard program influence incentives to enter and exit the biofuel market in different ways. Annual adjustments to the standard coupled with the unpredictable expiration and reinstatement of blender tax credits can work to discourage investment in biofuels and undermine effectiveness of the program. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 100
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty, Irreversibility, and Investment in Second-Generation Biofuels
    Tanner McCarty
    Juan Sesmero
    [J]. BioEnergy Research, 2015, 8 : 675 - 687
  • [2] Uncertainty, Irreversibility, and Investment in Second-Generation Biofuels
    McCarty, Tanner
    Sesmero, Juan
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (02) : 675 - 687
  • [3] A second-generation biofuel
    Canter, Neil
    [J]. TRIBOLOGY & LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 64 (07) : 16 - 17
  • [4] Technologies in Second-generation Biofuel Production
    Hromadko, Jan
    Hromadko, Jiri
    Miler, Petr
    Honig, Vladimir
    Cindr, Martin
    [J]. CHEMICKE LISTY, 2010, 104 (08): : 784 - 790
  • [5] Second-generation biofuels need investment
    Cozier, Muriel
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2010, 4 (06): : 587 - 587
  • [6] The interaction between EU biofuel policy and first- and second-generation biodiesel production
    Boutesteijn, Coen
    Drabik, Dugan
    Venus, Thomas J.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2017, 106 : 124 - 129
  • [7] Efficiency of second-generation biofuel crop subsidy schemes: Spatial heterogeneity and policy design
    Andree, Bo Pieter Johannes
    Diogo, Vasco
    Koomen, Eric
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 848 - 862
  • [8] Producing second-generation biofuel from plant materials
    G. A. Bulatkin
    [J]. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2010, 80 : 294 - 298
  • [9] Producing second-generation biofuel from plant materials
    Bulatkin, G. A.
    [J]. HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2010, 80 (03) : 294 - 298
  • [10] Technoeconomic assessment of second-generation biofuel pathways: challenges and solutions
    Brown, Tristan R.
    [J]. BIOFUELS-UK, 2013, 4 (04): : 351 - 353