Efficiency of second-generation biofuel crop subsidy schemes: Spatial heterogeneity and policy design

被引:19
|
作者
Andree, Bo Pieter Johannes [1 ]
Diogo, Vasco [1 ]
Koomen, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ SPINlab, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Spatial heterogeneity; Biofuels; Subsidy schemes; Spatial model; Cost efficiency; Net present value; Agricultural land use; EUROPE SUSTAINABLE USE; PRODUCTION POTENTIALS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; LAND-USE; AGRICULTURAL LAND; CULTIVATED LAND; ENERGY CROPS; NETHERLANDS; FUTURE; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Policy schemes that aim to stimulate the cultivation of biofuel crops typically ignore the spatial heterogeneity in costs and benefits associated with their production. Because of spatial heterogeneity in biophysical, and current agricultural production factors, potential gains from stimulating biofuel crops are non-uniformly distributed across space. This paper explores implications of this type of heterogeneity for the net benefits associated with different subsidy schemes. We present a simple framework based on discounted cash flows, to assess potential gains from introducing the notion of heterogeneity into stimulation schemes. We show that agricultural subsidy spending can be reduced in a Pareto efficient way and simultaneously improve the total stimulation potential of biofuel policies, when schemes: 1) are production based instead of land based; 2) accommodate differences in opportunity costs, and 3) target sites where subsidies for conventional agricultural land-use types are high. These results are robust for a range of different bioenergy prices and the relative gains of addressing these key elements in policy compared to conventional stimulation schemes increase with lower bioenergy prices, and are largest when low prices coincide with high emission reduction ambitions. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 862
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A second-generation biofuel
    Canter, Neil
    [J]. TRIBOLOGY & LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 64 (07) : 16 - 17
  • [2] Policy uncertainty and the optimal investment decisions of second-generation biofuel producers
    Markel, Evan
    Sims, Charles
    English, Burton C.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 76 : 89 - 100
  • [3] Technologies in Second-generation Biofuel Production
    Hromadko, Jan
    Hromadko, Jiri
    Miler, Petr
    Honig, Vladimir
    Cindr, Martin
    [J]. CHEMICKE LISTY, 2010, 104 (08): : 784 - 790
  • [4] Funding second-generation cellulosic biofuel projects
    Eustermann, John M.
    [J]. Industrial Biotechnology, 2010, 6 (02) : 78 - 84
  • [5] The interaction between EU biofuel policy and first- and second-generation biodiesel production
    Boutesteijn, Coen
    Drabik, Dugan
    Venus, Thomas J.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2017, 106 : 124 - 129
  • [6] Producing second-generation biofuel from plant materials
    Bulatkin, G. A.
    [J]. HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2010, 80 (03) : 294 - 298
  • [7] Producing second-generation biofuel from plant materials
    G. A. Bulatkin
    [J]. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2010, 80 : 294 - 298
  • [8] Technoeconomic assessment of second-generation biofuel pathways: challenges and solutions
    Brown, Tristan R.
    [J]. BIOFUELS-UK, 2013, 4 (04): : 351 - 353
  • [9] Subsidy schemes of renewable energy policy for electricity generation in Thailand
    Keyuraphan, S.
    Thanarak, P.
    Ketjoy, N.
    Rakwichian, W.
    [J]. ISEEC, 2012, 32 : 440 - 448
  • [10] Metabolomics: a second-generation platform for crop and food analysis
    Shepherd, Louise V. T.
    Fraser, Paul
    Stewart, Derek
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2011, 3 (10) : 1143 - 1159