Electrical Stimulation for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature

被引:44
|
作者
Barroso, Ubirajara, Jr. [1 ]
Tourinho, Rafael [1 ]
Lordelo, Patricia [1 ]
Hoebeke, Piet [2 ]
Chase, Janet [3 ]
机构
[1] CEDIMI, Bahiana Sch Med, Dept Urol, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Urol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Royal Childrens Hosp, Monash Med Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
children; electrical stimulation; lower urinary tract; VOIDING DYSFUNCTION; SACRAL NEUROMODULATION; TRANSCUTANEOUS NEUROMODULATION; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; ELIMINATION SYNDROME; NOCTURNAL ENURESIS; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; URGE INCONTINENCE; ANTIMUSCARINICS;
D O I
10.1002/nau.21140
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: To review studies using electrical neural stimulation (ENS), to treat children with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTD), and to establish the efficacy of this treatment. Methods: This review was based on an electronic search of the MEDLINE database and the Cochrane Central Search library, from January 1990 to March 2010. Inclusion criteria: (1) participants aged 0-17 years, (2) participants with a diagnosis of LUTD not related to congenital abnormalities or neurological disease, (3) English language, and (4) treatment by ENS. Results: Seventeen papers were evaluated. Type of ENS varied among studies: sacral transcutaneous ENS in seven, sacral implanted device in four, posterior tibial percutaneous in three, and anogenital, endoanal, and intravesical in one each. There were two randomized clinical trials. Clarity regarding the LUTD being treated was variable. The populations studied were not homogeneous. The duration of treatment and the number of sessions a week were variable among the studies. Electrical parameters used also varied. A range of subjective and objective measures was used to measure treatment success. Rates of complete resolution of the symptoms of OAB, urgency, and daytime incontinence ranged from 31% to 86% [Trsinar and Kraij, Neurourol Urodyn 15: 133-42, 1996; Hagstroem et al., J Urol 182: 2072-8, 2009], 25% to 84% [Hoebeke et al., J Urol 168: 2605-8, 2002; Lordelo et al., J Urol 182: 2900-4, 2009], 13% to 84% [Malm-Buatsi et al., Urology 70: 980-3, 2007; Lordelo et al., J Urol 184: 683-9, 2010], respectively. For sacral transcutaneous ENS recurrence ranged from 10% to 25%. Apart from the sacral implantation studies, any reported side effects were mild and transitory. Conclusions: The literature in the area of interest is sparse. Parasacral TENS has been shown to be more effective than sham in randomized trials in treating OAB. This deserves further research to elucidate the optimal parameters and the children for whom it is most useful. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30: 1429-1436, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1429 / 1436
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Re: The Role of Urinary Microbiota in Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Systematic Review Editorial Comment
    Wein, Alan J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03): : 450 - 450
  • [22] Pelvic floor muscles training, electrical stimulation, bladder training and lifestyle interventions to manage lower urinary tract dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
    Gaspard, L.
    Tombal, B.
    Castille, Y.
    Opsomer, R. -J.
    Detrembleur, C.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2014, 24 (04): : 222 - 228
  • [23] Urinary biomarkers in children with neurogenic and non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sekerci, Cagri Akin
    Yucel, Selcuk
    Tarcan, Tufan
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2024, 43 (04) : 1003 - 1018
  • [24] Sacral Neuromodulation for Lower Urinary Tract and Bowel Dysfunction in Animal Models: A Systematic Review With Focus on Stimulation Parameter Selection
    Douven, Perla
    Assmann, Roman
    Breukink, Stephanie O.
    Melenhorst, Jarno
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Joosten, Elbert A.
    van Koeveringe, Gommert A.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (08): : 1094 - 1107
  • [25] Stimulation Parameters for Sacral Neuromodulation on Lower Urinary Tract and Bowel Dysfunction-Related Clinical Outcome: A Systematic Review
    Assmann, Roman
    Douven, Perla
    Kleijnen, Jos
    van Koeveringe, Gommert A.
    Joosten, Elbert A.
    Melenhorst, Jarnoiii
    Breukink, Stephanie O.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (08): : 1082 - 1093
  • [26] Is there a unique symptom in lower urinary tract dysfunction in children?
    Ozen, Mehmet A.
    Tasdemir, Mehmet
    Aygun, Murat S.
    Necef, Isil
    Aydin, Emrah
    Bilge, Ilmay
    Eroglu, Egemen
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2021, 13 (02) : 264 - 270
  • [27] Lower urinary tract dysfunction in children a practical approach
    Lie, Anine
    Fossum, Vibeke
    Aden, Petra
    Teigen, Cathrine
    Bjerre, Anna
    Gjerstad, Ann Christin
    Skari, Hans
    TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2020, 140 (02) : 155 - 159
  • [28] EVALUATION OF LOWER URINARY TRACT DYSFUNCTION IN OBESE CHILDREN
    Asilturk, Havva Nur
    Ozhan, Bayram
    Yuksel, Selcuk
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 33 (10) : 1851 - 1851
  • [29] Lower urinary tract dysfunction in children with vesicoureteric reflux
    Korzeniecka-Kozerska, A.
    Zoch-Zwierz, W.
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 22 (09) : 1510 - 1510
  • [30] Renal transplantation in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction
    Grapin-Dagorno, Christine
    Boubnova, Julia
    Ulinski, Tim
    Audry, Georges
    Bensman, Albert
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2007, 191 (03): : 569 - 581