Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy

被引:65
|
作者
Mollison, J
Porter, M
Campbell, D
Bhattacharya, S
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00651.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the relationship between primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy and to compare the findings with a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort from the same population. Design Population cohort. Setting Aberdeen City, Scotland. Population Women who delivered their first singleton child in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital between 1980 and 1997. Methods Population-based data relating to the index and next pregnancy event, if any, were obtained from the Aberdeen Maternity Neonatal Databank. Subsequent pregnancy was compared across the three modes of delivery groups using log rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Main outcome measure First subsequent pregnancy following index delivery. Results Women who delivered by caesarean section (CS) were less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with those who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI 0.87, 0.95). This confirmed the findings of a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort of the same population. The median time to next pregnancy following CS was 36.3 months, 31.8 months following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and 30.4 months following SVD. In contrast to the earlier study where women who had an instrumental delivery were found to be an intermediate group, we found no difference in subsequent pregnancy following IVD compared with SVD, HR = 1.0 (95% CI 0.96, 1.03). Conclusions Following an initial delivery by CS, fewer women went on to have another pregnancy compared with SVD. The incidence of subsequent pregnancy is similar following instrumental and SVD.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1065
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mood disturbance in pregnancy and the mode of delivery
    Wu, J
    Viguera, A
    Riley, L
    Cohen, L
    Ecker, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (04) : 864 - 867
  • [32] Poor steep in pregnancy and mode of delivery
    Caughey, AB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (03) : 1286 - 1286
  • [33] Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome
    Bjorstad, Astrid R.
    Irgens-Hansen, Kaja
    Daltveit, Anne Kjersti
    Irgens, Lorentz M.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (05) : 664 - 669
  • [34] Multiple pregnancy: which mode of delivery?
    Chervenak, FA
    LABOR AND DELIVERY, 1998, : 74 - 79
  • [35] PREGNANCY OUTCOMES AND MODE OF DELIVERY IN EURAP
    Tomson, T.
    EPILEPSIA, 2009, 50 : 106 - 107
  • [36] PREGNANCY OUTCOME SUBSEQUENT TO PRIMARY CESAREAN CHILDBIRTH
    ZDEB, M
    THERRIAULT, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 116 (03) : 584 - 584
  • [37] PRIMARY ABDOMINAL PREGNANCY IN A CAT SUBSEQUENT TO OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY
    CARRIG, CB
    PHILBRICK, AL
    GOURLEY, IM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1972, 160 (03): : 308 - +
  • [38] POSTPARTUM CONTRACEPTION - SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY, DELIVERY, AND ABORTION RATES
    SHULMAN, JJ
    MERRITT, CG
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1976, 27 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [39] Changing paternity and the risk of preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy
    Li, DK
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (02) : 148 - 152
  • [40] Risk of complications with subsequent pregnancy after twin delivery
    Farrell, Amy
    Leet, Terry
    Cooper, Benjamin
    Natwick, Heather
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04): : 49S - 49S