Creativity in architecture design studio. Assessing students' and instructors' perception

被引:8
|
作者
Doheim, Rahma M. [1 ,2 ]
Yusof, Noraini [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Effat Univ, Jeddah 21478, Saudi Arabia
[2] Assiut Univ, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Univ Sains, George Town, Malaysia
关键词
EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119418
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Teaching and assessing creativity is a confronting dilemma in architecture education. With the fact that creativity has many definitions that none of which is universally accepted, having a level of agreement on the creativity perception among both students and instructors is essential to have an effective creativity assessment. The students' and instructors' interpretation of creativity in the architectural context should vary from a level of education to another based on the needs of each level and the intended learning outcomes of the Studio. This research investigates the level of agreement and disagreement of creativity perception between a group of students and their instructors within the architectural context of the design studio. Interviews and surveys were conducted with a group of Architecture students (third year) and their instructors to assess their perception of creativity. The findings show that creativity is conceptualized differently among students and instructors. Students and their instructors have more disagreement than agreement on how they perceive creativity in the architectural context. The required areas of improvement in architecture education will be suggested. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Insights into product design students’ perception of, and engagement with, creativity in design education
    Dermot McInerney
    [J]. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2023, 33 : 1199 - 1219
  • [22] Jose Manuel Aizpurua & Joaquin Labayen: Architecture Studio. 1928. Architecture and Furniture in the Beginning of Modernism
    Munoz Fernandez, Francisco Javier
    [J]. ARS BILDUMA, 2015, (05): : 91 - 105
  • [23] THE IMPACT OF ARCHITECTURAL STUDIO CONDITIONS ON STUDENTS' CREATIVITY
    Izobo-Martins, Oladunni Oluwatoyin
    Aboderin, Oluwafunmilayo Deborah
    Abah, George Ojochogwu
    Ilolo, David Ovie
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (EDULEARN17), 2017, : 598 - 607
  • [24] DESIGN STUDIO STRATEGIES FOR STIMULATING CREATIVITY
    Ozturk Kosencig, Kamile
    Ozbayraktar, Mehtap
    [J]. ANADOLU UNIVERSITESI SANAT & TASARIM DERGISI-ANADOLU UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ART & DESIGN, 2023, 13 (02): : 561 - 578
  • [25] Architecture Education and Fashion Design: "Fashion - Reject Studio" in International Architecture Students Meeting
    Ertas, Sebnem
    Samlioglu, Tulay
    [J]. 4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCHES (WCETR-2014), 2015, 182 : 149 - 154
  • [26] International Students' Insight and Creativity for Seoul: Seoul Biennale of Architecture and Urbanism 2017 International Studio
    Narae, Kim
    [J]. SPACE, 2017, (594): : 18 - 18
  • [27] Teachers' perception of students' performance in the architectural design studio in the light of Bourdieu
    Iqbal, Mamuna
    Roberts, Andrew
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2019, 40 (08) : 1154 - 1169
  • [28] CREATIVITY 'MISRULES': FIRST YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENTS' PRODUCTION AND PERCEPTION OF CREATIVITY IN DESIGN IDEAS
    Gray, Colin M.
    Yilmaz, Seda
    Daly, Shanna
    Seifert, Colleen M.
    Gonzalez, Richard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 3, 2016,
  • [29] Using Blogs As A Communication Tool For Teaching Students In The Architecture Design Studio
    Baldea, Maja
    Maier, Alexandra
    Simionescu, Oana
    [J]. Proceedings of 6th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 2015, 191 : 2758 - 2762
  • [30] Studio instructors talk about skills, knowledge, and professional roles in architecture and landscape architecture
    Sancar, FH
    Eyikan, B
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 30 (03) : 378 - 397