Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries

被引:5
|
作者
Barais, Marie [1 ]
van de Wiel, Margje W. J. [2 ]
Groell, Nicolas [1 ]
Dany, Antoine [3 ]
Montier, Tristan [4 ]
Van Royen, Paul [5 ]
Stolper, Erik C. F. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Fac Med & Sci Sante, Dept Gen Practice, EA 7479,SPURBO, Brest, France
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Work & Social Psychol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Fac Med & Sci Sante, Dept Publ Hlth, EA 7479,SPURBO, Brest, France
[4] Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Fac Med & Sci Sante, Inserm UMR1078, Brest, France
[5] Univ Antwerp, Dept Primary & Interdisciplinary Care, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
[6] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Family Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 11期
关键词
feasibility study; questionnaire; gut feelings; family medicine; general practitioners;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023488
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The validated Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) is a 10-item questionnaire based on the definitions of the sense of alarm and the sense of reassurance. The purpose of the GFQ is to determine the presence or absence of gut feelings in the diagnostic reasoning of general practitioners (GPs). The aim was to test the GFQ on GPs, in real practice settings, to check whether any changes were needed to improve feasibility, and to calculate the prevalence of the GPs' sense of alarm and sense of reassurance in three different countries. Setting Primary care, six participating centres in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. Participants We performed a think-aloud study with 24 experienced Dutch GPs, GP trainees and medical clerks who filled in the GFQ after diagnosing each of six case vignettes. We then performed a feasibility study in two phases, using a mixed-method approach, with 42 French and Dutch GPs in the first phase and then 10 Belgian, 10 Dutch and 10 French GPs in the second phase. All GPs filled in the GFQ after each of eight consultations with patients presenting new complaints and were subsequently interviewed about the use of the GFQ. Outcome measures GPs' experiences on using the GFQ in real practice, more specifically the average time needed for filling in the questionnaire. The prevalence of GPs' sense of alarm and sense of reassurance. Results The modified version of the GFQ, created without altering the sense of the validated items, was easy to use in daily practice. The prevalence of the GPs' sense of alarm occurred during 23%-31% of the included consultations. Conclusions After a two-step study and several minor adaptations, the final version of the GFQ proved to be a feasible and practical tool to be used for prospective observational studies in daily practice.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A mixed-methods approach to understanding barriers and facilitators to healthy eating and exercise from five European countries: highlighting the roles of enjoyment, emotion and social engagement
    Snuggs, Sarah
    Clot, Sophie
    Lamport, Daniel
    Sah, Anumeha
    Forrest, Joseph
    Guizon, Agnes Helme
    Kaur, Amanpreet
    Iqbal, Zara
    Caldara, Cindy
    Wilhelm, Marie-Claire
    Anin, Camille
    Vogt, Julia
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2023,
  • [42] Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices
    Carter, Mary
    Fletcher, Emily
    Sansom, Anna
    Warren, Fiona C.
    Campbell, John L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [43] The acceptability and feasibility of using a3Dbody size scale to initiate conversations about weight in toddlerhood: a mixed-methods study
    Tommerup, Kristiane
    Smith, Andrea D.
    Evans, Elizabeth H.
    Croker, Helen
    Steptoe, Andrew
    Tovee, Martin J.
    Fildes, Alison
    Llewellyn, Clare
    PEDIATRIC OBESITY, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [44] Monitoring of the Implementation of a Breastfeeding Guideline for 6 Years: A Mixed-Methods Study Using an Interrupted Time Series Approach
    Ruzafa-Martinez, Maria
    Harillo-Acevedo, David
    Ramos-Morcillo, Antonio Jesus
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2021, 53 (03) : 358 - 368
  • [45] A novel approach to increase physical activity in older adults in the community using citizen science: a mixed-methods study
    Frei, Anja
    Dalla Lana, Kaba
    Radtke, Thomas
    Stone, Emily
    Knoepfli, Nevil
    Puhan, Milo A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 64 (05) : 669 - 678
  • [46] Extracting Best-Practice Using Mixed-Methods Insights and Recommendations from a Case Study in Insurance Claims Processing
    Poppe, Erik
    Pika, Anastasiia
    Wynn, Moe Thandar
    Eden, Rebekah
    Andrews, Robert
    ter Hofstede, Arthur H. M.
    BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2021, 63 (06) : 637 - 651
  • [47] Using practice facilitation to improve alcohol-related care in primary care: a mixed-methods pilot study protocol
    Bachrach, Rachel L.
    Chinman, Matthew
    Rodriguez, Keri L.
    Mor, Maria K.
    Kraemer, Kevin L.
    Garfunkel, Cecile E.
    Williams, Emily C.
    ADDICTION SCIENCE & CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [48] Using practice facilitation to improve alcohol-related care in primary care: a mixed-methods pilot study protocol
    Rachel L. Bachrach
    Matthew Chinman
    Keri L. Rodriguez
    Maria K. Mor
    Kevin L. Kraemer
    Cécile E. Garfunkel
    Emily C. Williams
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 17
  • [49] Erratum to Development of a core outcome set for orthodontic trials using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for a multicentre study
    Aliki Tsichlaki
    Kevin O’Brien
    Ama Johal
    Zoe Z. Marshman
    Philip P. Benson
    Fiorella B. Colonio Salazar
    Padhraig S. Fleming
    Trials, 18
  • [50] Preliminary measurement properties of the Pain Assessment for Lower Back-Impacts Questionnaire (PAL-I): development using a mixed-methods approach
    Bushnell, Donald M.
    McCarrier, Kelly P.
    Ramasamy, Abhilasha
    Liedgens, Hiltrud
    Braam, Lauren A.
    Martin, Mona L.
    Blum, Steven I.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 : 167 - 167