Effect of combining different surface treatments on the surface characteristics of polyetheretherketone-based core materials and shear bond strength to a veneering composite resin

被引:15
|
作者
Taha, Doaa [1 ,2 ]
Safwat, Farida [2 ]
Wahsh, Marwa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Sect Med Mat Sci & Technol, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, Khalifa El Maamon St, Cairo 11566, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2022年 / 127卷 / 04期
关键词
PEEK; PLASMA; IMPLANTOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. High-performance polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has been used in dentistry because of its excellent physical and chemical properties. However, its lack of translucency requires the use of a veneering composite resin for esthetic applications. Data on bonding a veneering composite resin to PEEK are still scarce. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of using and combining different surface treatments on the surface roughness and wettability of PEEK core materials and the shear bond strength (SBS) to a veneering composite resin. Material and methods. Sixty square PEEK specimens were divided according to surface treatments into 6 groups: group N, no surface treatment; group A, airborne-particle abrasion; group L, ER:YAG laser treatment; group LA, laser treatment and airborne-particle abrasion; group P, plasma treatment; and group PA, plasma treatment and airborne-particle abrasion. Surface roughness (Ra) and wettability (contact angle theta) were measured followed by evaluation of the surface topography. After veneering, the SBS was measured. A 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess all interactions with multiple pairwise comparisons (alpha=.05). Results. The highest mean Ra values were obtained for the combination treatment groups (LA 2.94 +/- 0.1 and PA 2.7 +/- 0.1 mu m) (P<.001). While the laser (13 +/- 0.1 mu m) and plasma treatment (1.4 +/- 0.1 mu m) groups had the lowest Ra values, LA and PA had the highest wetting of PEEK surfaces (LA 6.9 +/- 0.7 and PA 4.9 +/- 0.2 degrees) (P<.001). The highest mean SBS values were demonstrated on PEEK surfaces with combination treatments (LA 22 +/- 1.3 and PA 21.2 +/- 0.8 MPa) (P<.001). Conclusions. Combining airborne-particle abrasion with laser or plasma treatments increased the surface roughness and wettability of PEEK surfaces favorably compared with applying each of the 3 treatments individually. The combinations enhanced the bond strength of PEEK to the veneering composite resin.
引用
收藏
页码:599.e1 / 599.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a gingiva-colored indirect composite veneering material to three implant framework materials
    Koizuka, Mai
    Komine, Futoshi
    Blatz, Markus B.
    Fushiki, Ryosuke
    Taguchi, Kohei
    Matsumura, Hideo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (09) : 977 - 984
  • [42] Shear bond strength of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations
    Matsumura, H
    Yanagida, H
    Tanoue, N
    Atsuta, M
    Shimoe, S
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 86 (03): : 315 - 319
  • [43] Bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia after different surface treatments
    Cevik, Pinar
    Cengiz, Daime
    Malkoc, Meral Arslan
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (22) : 2466 - 2476
  • [44] Bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia after different surface treatments
    Cevik, Pinar (pinarcevik@gazi.edu.tr), 1600, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (30):
  • [45] Effect of repeated laser surface treatments on shear bond strength between zirconia and veneering ceramic
    Abdullah, Adil O.
    Hui Yu
    Pollington, Sarah
    Muhammed, Fenik K.
    Sun Xudong
    Yi Liu
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (02): : 338.e1 - 338.e6
  • [46] Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials
    Junior, Sinval A. Rodrigues
    Ferracane, Jack L.
    Della Bona, Alvaro
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2009, 25 (04) : 442 - 451
  • [47] Effect of different surface treatments on the composite–composite repair bond strength
    Andreas Rathke
    Yana Tymina
    Bernd Haller
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2009, 13
  • [48] Effect of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite resin
    Kimyai, Soodabeh
    Oskoee, Siavash Savadi
    Mohammadi, Narmin
    Rikhtegaran, Sahand
    Bahari, Mahmoud
    Oskoee, Parnian Alizadeh
    Vahedpour, Hafez
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 30 (02) : 653 - 659
  • [49] Effect of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite resin
    Soodabeh Kimyai
    Siavash Savadi Oskoee
    Narmin Mohammadi
    Sahand Rikhtegaran
    Mahmoud Bahari
    Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee
    Hafez Vahedpour
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2015, 30 : 653 - 659
  • [50] An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Various Adhesives and Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Polyetheretherketone
    Caglar, Ipek
    Ates, Sabit Melih
    Duymus, Zeynep Yesil
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (01): : E342 - E349