Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits

被引:5
|
作者
Liao, Wei-Yeh [1 ]
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ]
Semmler, John G. [1 ]
Opie, George M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biomed, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 07期
关键词
PAIRED-PULSE TMS; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; COIL ORIENTATION; BRAIN INHIBITION; SURFACE EMG; CORTEX; PLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; NEUROMODULATION; FACILITATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0271311
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late Iwave circuits. 22 young adults (22 +/- 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP1mV) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEPPA) and anterior-posterior (MEPAP) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP1mV, CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCSCB broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEPAP also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEPPA potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals asymmetrical efficacy of intracortical circuits in primary motor cortex
    Geoff Hammond
    Deb Faulkner
    Michelle Byrnes
    Frank Mastaglia
    Gary Thickbroom
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2004, 155 : 19 - 23
  • [22] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the Cortical Motor Areas in Three Cases of Cerebellar Ataxia
    Nicolò Gabriele Pozzi
    Brigida Minafra
    Roberta Zangaglia
    Roberto De Marzi
    Giorgio Sandrini
    Alberto Priori
    Claudio Pacchetti
    [J]. The Cerebellum, 2014, 13 : 109 - 112
  • [23] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the Cortical Motor Areas in Three Cases of Cerebellar Ataxia
    Pozzi, Nicolo Gabriele
    Minafra, Brigida
    Zangaglia, Roberta
    De Marzi, Roberto
    Sandrini, Giorgio
    Priori, Alberto
    Pacchetti, Claudio
    [J]. CEREBELLUM, 2014, 13 (01): : 109 - 112
  • [24] The impact of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on learning fine-motor sequences
    Shimizu, Renee E.
    Wu, Allan D.
    Samra, Jasmine K.
    Knowlton, Barbara J.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 372 (1711)
  • [25] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Motor Learning in a Complex Overhand Throwing Task
    Jackson, Austuny K.
    de Albuquerque, Lidio Lima
    Pantovic, Milan
    Fischer, Katherine M.
    Guadagnoli, Mark A.
    Riley, Zachary A.
    Poston, Brach
    [J]. CEREBELLUM, 2019, 18 (04): : 813 - 816
  • [26] The Effect of Parietal and Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Bimanual Coordinated Adaptive Motor Learning
    Azarpaikan, Atefeh
    Torbati, Hamid Reza Taherii
    Sohrabi, Mehdi
    Boostani, Reza
    Ghoshuni, Majid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [27] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Motor Learning in a Complex Overhand Throwing Task
    Austuny K. Jackson
    Lidio Lima de Albuquerque
    Milan Pantovic
    Katherine M. Fischer
    Mark A. Guadagnoli
    Zachary A. Riley
    Brach Poston
    [J]. The Cerebellum, 2019, 18 : 813 - 816
  • [28] CEREBELLAR TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION FOR SCHIZOPHRENIA: A CURRENT MODELLING STUDY
    Guiomar, Raquel
    Catoira, Beatriz
    Sobral, Monica
    Castilho, Paula
    Baeken, Chris
    Ganho-Avila, Ana
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2022, 34 : 12 - 13
  • [29] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Ameliorates Chronic Pain and Reduces Short Intracortical Inhibition
    Antal, Andrea
    Terney, Daniella
    Kuehnl, Stefanie
    Paulus, Walter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (05) : 890 - 903
  • [30] Cerebellar, but not Motor or Parietal, High-Density Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Facilitates Motor Adaptation
    Doppelmayr, Michael
    Pixa, Nils Henrik
    Steinberg, Fabian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 22 (09) : 928 - 936