Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits

被引:5
|
作者
Liao, Wei-Yeh [1 ]
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ]
Semmler, John G. [1 ]
Opie, George M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biomed, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 07期
关键词
PAIRED-PULSE TMS; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; COIL ORIENTATION; BRAIN INHIBITION; SURFACE EMG; CORTEX; PLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; NEUROMODULATION; FACILITATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0271311
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late Iwave circuits. 22 young adults (22 +/- 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP1mV) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEPPA) and anterior-posterior (MEPAP) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP1mV, CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCSCB broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEPAP also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEPPA potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modulation of intracortical inhibition and facilitation of motor cortex through transcranial direct current stimulation
    Ogata, Katsuya
    Yamasaki, Takao
    Tobimatsu, Shozo
    [J]. 2007 IEEE/ICME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX MEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 2000 - 2003
  • [2] Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation does not alter motor surround inhibition
    Sadnicka, Anna
    Kassavetis, Panagiotis
    Saifee, Tabish A.
    Parees, Isabel
    Rothwell, John C.
    Edwards, Mark J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 123 (06) : 425 - 432
  • [3] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation For Motor Function In Parkinson's Disease
    de Albuquerque, Lidio Lima
    Fischer, Katherine
    Vo, Song
    Landers, Merrill
    Poston, Brach
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 29 - 29
  • [4] Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception
    Rogalewski, A
    Breitenstein, C
    Nitsche, MA
    Paulus, W
    Knecht, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 20 (01) : 313 - 316
  • [5] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Neuroplasticity and Accelerates Motor Recovery in a Stroke Mouse Model
    Longo, Valentina
    Barbati, Saviana Antonella
    Re, Agnese
    Paciello, Fabiola
    Bolla, Maria
    Rinaudo, Marco
    Miraglia, Francesca
    Alu, Francesca
    Di Donna, Martina Gaia
    Vecchio, Fabrizio
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    Podda, Maria Vittoria
    Grassi, Claudio
    [J]. STROKE, 2022, 53 (05) : 1746 - 1758
  • [6] Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: A transcranial direct current stimulation study
    Hordacre, Brenton
    Moezzi, Bahar
    Ridding, Michael C.
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2018, 39 (08) : 3326 - 3339
  • [7] Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Visual Neuroplasticity in Schizophrenia
    Jahshan, Carol
    Wynn, Jonathan K.
    Roach, Brian J.
    Mathalon, Daniel H.
    Green, Michael F.
    [J]. CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 51 (06) : 382 - 389
  • [8] Induction and modulation of neuroplasticity by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans
    Nitsche, MA
    Antal, A
    Liebetanz, D
    Lang, N
    Tergau, F
    Paulus, W
    [J]. KLINISCHE NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE, 2004, 35 (02) : 55 - 60
  • [9] Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates the fMRI signal in the cerebellar nuclei in a simple motor task
    Kueper, Michael
    Mallick, Jahan Saeed
    Ernst, Thomas
    Kraff, Oliver
    Thuerling, Markus
    Stefanescu, Maria Roxana
    Goericke, Sophia
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Timmann, Dagmar
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (05) : 1169 - 1176
  • [10] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
    Summers, Rebekah L. S.
    Chen, Mo
    Hatch, Andrea
    Kimberley, Teresa J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12