Red lists in conservation science-policy interfaces: A case study from Vietnam

被引:10
|
作者
Thi Huong Do [1 ,2 ]
Krotta, Max [1 ]
Juerges, Nataly [1 ]
Boecher, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] George August Univ Gottingen, Chair Grp Forest & Nat Conservat Policy, Busgenweg 3, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ Forestry, Coll Land Management & Rural Dev, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Otto von Guericke Univ, Chair Polit Sci & Sustainable Dev, Zschokkestr 32, D-39016 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
Biodiversity conservation; Red lists; RIU model; Science-policy interface; Science-based policy advice; Vietnamese Red Data Book; SCIENTIFIC-KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; LOCAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RIU MODEL; ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; BIODIVERSITY; CRITERIA; FOREST; FUTURE; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.016
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Red lists of threatened species have been a powerful instrument to interact loss of biodiversity in many countries. However, there have been growing concerns over the scientific basis of red lists and the influence of red lists on conservation policy formulation. This article explores science-policy interface in the development and use of the Vietnamese Red Data Book 2007 by applying the Research - Integration - Utilization (RIU) model of scientific knowledge transfer. Our study has shown the scientific weaknesses of the Vietnamese Red Data Book 2007, which arise from limited availability of updated data on rare and threatened species in Vietnam and unknown factors influencing them. Despite the existing limitations, the science-based policy advice of the Vietnamese Red Data Book 2007 has achieved certain political influence due to successful integration. Our study also reveals that good and actor-relevant communication could help to win powerful allies in conservation policy formulation, which contributes to a successful transfer of scientific knowledge. Based on our results, we recommend that the improvement of the scientific basis of the red lists is essential to enhance science-based policy support in biodiversity conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 110
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transformative science-policy interfacing: the case of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Sarkki, Simo
    Young, Juliette C.
    Vandewalle, Marie
    Heikkinen, Hannu I.
    Norum, Roger
    Stenseke, Marie
    Nesshoever, Carsten
    Wittmer, Heidi
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2025, 20 (01) : 231 - 249
  • [32] Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science-policy interfaces: Challenges and opportunities
    Heink, Ulrich
    Marquard, Elisabeth
    Heubach, Katja
    Jax, Kurt
    Kugel, Carolin
    Nesshoever, Carsten
    Neumann, Rosmarie K.
    Paulsch, Axel
    Tilch, Sebastian
    Timaeus, Johannes
    Vandewalle, Marie
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 42 (05) : 676 - 689
  • [33] Challenges for freshwater science in policy development: reflections from the science-policy interface in New Zealand
    Rouse, Helen L.
    Norton, Ned
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (01) : 7 - 20
  • [34] The science-policy interfaces of the European network for observing our changing planet: From Earth Observation data to policy-oriented decisions
    Pirrone, Nicola
    Mazzetti, Paolo
    Cinnirella, Sergio
    Athanasopoulou, Eleni
    Gerasopoulos, Evangelos
    Klanova, Jana
    Lehmann, Anthony
    Maso Pau, Joan
    Petaja, Tuukka
    Pokorny, Lukas
    Sebkova, Katerina
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 137 : 359 - 372
  • [35] Towards meaningful youth participation in science-policy processes: a case study of the Youth in Landscapes Initiative
    Dickson-Hoyle, Sarah
    Kovacevic, Michelle
    Cherbonnier, Marina
    Nicholas, Kimberly A.
    ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2018, 6
  • [36] Science-policy interaction: The case of the forest and forestry revitalisation plan in Japan
    Nagasaka, Kenji
    Boecher, Michael
    Krott, Max
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 58 : 145 - 151
  • [37] Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces
    Sarkki, Simo
    Niemela, Jari
    Tinch, Rob
    van den Hove, Sybille
    Watt, Allan
    Young, Juliette
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 41 (02) : 194 - 206
  • [38] A tale of two panels: learning and coordinating across IPCC, IPBES, and other science-policy interfaces
    Mcelwee, Pamela
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2025, 178 (03)
  • [39] Is There a Case for Recognising Taiwan at the International Science-Policy Interface for Climate Change?
    Mabon, Leslie
    Shih, Wan-Yu
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2021, 3
  • [40] Fisheries management: from linear to collaborative science-policy interface
    Aps, R.
    Fetissov, M.
    Holmgren, N.
    Norrstrom, N.
    Kuikka, S.
    MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ECOLOGICAL HAZARDS III, 2012, 148 : 3 - 14