Environmental Impact Analysis of Oil and Gas Pipe Repair Techniques Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

被引:4
|
作者
Shaukat, M. Mobeen [1 ]
Ashraf, Farhan [2 ]
Asif, Muhammad [3 ]
Pashah, Sulaman [4 ]
Makawi, Mohamed [3 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Mech Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Adv Mat, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Architectural Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[4] Texas A&M Univ Texarkana, Dept Mech Engn, 7101 Univ Ave, Texarkana, TX 75503 USA
关键词
energy; environment; pipe repair; oil and gas; environmental impact; life cycle assessment; ENERGY EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.3390/su14159499
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
External corrosion is one of the major defects for oil and gas pipes. Multiple repair techniques are used for repairing such pipes, which have different environmental effects. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) approach has been used to investigate the environmental impacts of four commonly used repair techniques. The techniques are fillet welded patch (FWP), weld buildup (WB), mechanical clamp (MC), and non-metallic composite overwrap (NCO). The repair processes based on guidelines from repair standards are carried out on a defected pipe specimen and experimental data required for LCA are collected. The paper conducts a cradle-to-gate LCA study using SimaPro software. Six environmental impact categories are used for the comparison of repair processes. The results for a repair life of ten years indicate that non-metallic composite overwrap has the highest whereas the fillet welded patch has the lowest environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of oxidative desulfurization of gas condensate in novel oxidation system
    Borj, Babak Pouladi
    Saeidi, Sepideh
    As'adi, Hassan
    Naddaf, Atiyeh
    Fekri, Homa
    Sarkhoshkalat, Mohammadmahdi
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2025, 371
  • [22] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Particleboard: Investigation of the Environmental Parameters
    Mohd Azman, Muhammad Aiman Hakim
    Ahmad Sobri, Sharizal
    Norizan, Mohd Natashah
    Ahmad, Mohd Nazri
    Wan Ismail, Wan Omar Ali Saifuddin
    Hambali, Kamarul Ariffin
    Hairi, Mohd Hendra
    Hermawan, Andi
    Mohamed, Mazlan
    Teo, Pao Ter
    Taharin, Mohammad Radzif
    Mat Noor, Noorsidi Aizuddin
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [23] Urban rainwater resource utilization: A sustainable environmental impact assessment using life cycle assessment (LCA) and water balance model
    Hu, Xiande
    Gu, Fenfei
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2025, 322
  • [25] Energy-economic life cycle assessment (LCA) and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of olive oil production in Iran
    Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali
    Akram, Asadolah
    Ghobadian, Barat
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Heidari, Mohammad Davoud
    ENERGY, 2014, 66 : 139 - 149
  • [26] Environmental Impact Analysis of Batik Natural Dyes Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Rinawati, Dyah Ika
    Sari, Diana Puspita
    Purwanggono, Bambang
    Hermawan, Andy Tri
    3RD INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (MIMEC2017), 2017, 1902
  • [27] Environmental Impact Analysis on Residential Building in Malaysia Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz
    Idris, Juferi
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03)
  • [28] Environmental assessment based on life cycle analysis (LCA) in the construction phase of a building in Catalonia
    Ortiz, O. O.
    Pasqualino, J.
    Castells, F.
    AFINIDAD, 2010, 67 (547) : 175 - 181
  • [29] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ANALYSIS OF ONE WIND FARM IN CHINA
    Li, Zhidong
    Zhang, Fan
    Song, Guobao
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2016, 25 (11): : 4537 - 4546
  • [30] Identifying environmental improvement opportunities for newsprint production using life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Salazar, E.
    Samson, R.
    Munnoch, K.
    Stuart, P.
    PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2006, 107 (11) : 32 - 38