Antecedents of risk and benefit perception of CCS

被引:12
|
作者
Wallquist, Lasse [1 ]
Visschers, Vivianne H. M. [1 ]
Siegrist, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, IED, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
CCS; Public Perception; Knowledge; Laypeople concepts; CARBON-DIOXIDE; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; ACCEPTANCE; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.643
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Public perception may have a strong impact on the progress of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS). Benefit perception and risk perception are known to be important determinants of public acceptance of CCS. In our study, we examined antecedents of risk and benefit perception of CCS by means of a representative survey and an experimental survey. Our results suggest that a variety of intuitive concepts about CCS influence risk perception and benefit perception. An attempt in fostering laypeople's knowledge about CCS and thereby correcting their misconceptions by providing expert information tailored to intuitive concepts of the respondents succeed in decreasing perceived risks and in increasing perceived benefits. However, in some knowledge domains the provision of information created confusion. We conclude that the effect of knowledge is likely to depend on the area of CCS for which it is used for and that the provision of expert information may not always enable laypeople to take better informed decisions. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:6288 / 6291
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antecedents and consequences of external risk perception in franchising: evidence from the hospitality industry
    Safon, Vicente
    Escriba-Esteve, Alejandro
    SERVICE BUSINESS, 2011, 5 (03) : 237 - 257
  • [22] Exploring subjective risk-benefit perception as an integral component in risk communication
    Lohmann, Mark
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [23] Expert stakeholders’ perception of nanotechnology: risk, benefit, knowledge, and regulation
    Simon Larsson
    Magnus Jansson
    Åsa Boholm
    Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2019, 21
  • [24] Expert stakeholders' perception of nanotechnology: risk, benefit, knowledge, and regulation
    Larsson, Simon
    Jansson, Magnus
    Boholm, Asa
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (03)
  • [25] State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Consumer perception
    Ueland, O.
    Gunnlaugsdottir, H.
    Holm, F.
    Kalogeras, N.
    Leino, O.
    Luteijn, J. M.
    Magnusson, S. H.
    Odekerken, G.
    Pohjola, M. V.
    Tijhuis, M. J.
    Tuomisto, J. T.
    White, B. C.
    Verhagen, H.
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 50 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [26] Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception
    Siegrist, M
    Cvetkovich, G
    Roth, C
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (03) : 353 - 362
  • [27] Pharmaceutical Benefit–Risk Perception and Age Differences in the USA and Germany
    Dominic H. P. Balog-Way
    Darrick Evensen
    Ragnar E. Löfstedt
    Drug Safety, 2020, 43 : 1141 - 1156
  • [28] Risk perception and cost benefit analysis of interventions to control Campylobacter
    Rosenquist, H.
    Heuer, O.
    Christensen, T.
    Lund, M.
    Korzen-Bohr, S.
    Hald, B.
    Knochel, S.
    Brondsted, L.
    Christensen, B.
    ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 54 : 144 - 144
  • [29] Benefit system and benefit level satisfaction: An expanded model of antecedents and consequences
    Williams, ML
    Malos, SB
    Palmer, DK
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2002, 28 (02) : 195 - 215
  • [30] Attitudes towards organic foods and risk/benefit perception associated with pesticides
    Saba, A
    Messina, F
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (08) : 637 - 645