Atomistic understanding of helium behaviors at grain boundaries in vanadium

被引:15
|
作者
Yang, Yaochun [1 ]
Ding, Jianhua [1 ]
Zhang, Hualei [2 ]
Zhang, Pengbo [3 ]
Mei, Xianxiu [1 ]
Huang, Shaosong [1 ]
Zhao, Jijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Mat Modificat Laser Ion & Electron Beams, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Ctr Microstruct Sci, Frontier Inst Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Mech Behav Mat, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Maritime Univ, Dept Phys, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Vanadium; Helium; Grain boundaries; Strength; Segregation; Diffusion; EMBRITTLEMENT; ALLOYS; VACANCY; 1ST-PRINCIPLES; NICKEL; HE; SEGREGATION; NUCLEATION; DIFFUSION; POINTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.11.036
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Using first-principles calculations, we systematically investigated the interaction of He (helium) with high-angle grain boundaries (GBs) in vanadium alloy. Three representative grain boundaries were examined: Sigma 3(1 2 1) GB with a compact structure, Sigma 3(1 1 1) and Sigma 5(0 1 2) GBs with open structures. Our results reveal that Sigma 3(1 2 1) GB has higher resistance to He segregation compared with the other GBs, since the segregation energy of He at Sigma 3(1 2 1) is high and He atoms are hardly trapped. All three GBs can decrease the He diffusivity along GB compared with bulk diffusion in vanadium and provide obstacles for He migration between the GB cavities. For the effect of He on the theoretical tensile strength of GBs, the cohesive strength of V GBs is weaken significantly, especially for Sigma 3(1 1 1) and Sigma 5(0 1 2) GBs, which results from that He can deplete considerably the charge density of GB region and weaken the interlayer bonding strength of GBs. It is worth noting that the low content of He (when one atom segregates at GBs) decrease slightly the cohesive strength of Sigma 3(1 2 1) GB, indicating that Sigma 3(1 2 1) exhibits better resistance to He-induced GB embrittlement compared with the other GBs. The physical mechanisms involved in He behaviors in the three distinct GBs are discussed in detail.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 306
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Atomistic simulation of grain boundaries, triple junctions and related disclinations
    Shenderova, OA
    Brenner, DW
    LOCAL LATTICE ROTATIONS AND DISCLINATIONS IN MICROSTRUCTURES OF DISTORTED CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS, 2002, 87 : 205 - 213
  • [42] Atomistic structure of Σ=3, (111) grain boundaries in strontium titanate
    Kienzle, O
    Exner, M
    Ernst, F
    PHYSICA STATUS SOLIDI A-APPLIED RESEARCH, 1998, 166 (01): : 57 - 71
  • [43] ATOMISTIC STRUCTURE OF GENERAL GRAIN-BOUNDARIES AND RELATION TO PROPERTIES
    VITEK, V
    SUTTON, AP
    MAEDA, K
    JOURNAL OF METALS, 1979, 31 (12): : 51 - 51
  • [44] Imeall: A computational framework for the calculation of the atomistic properties of grain boundaries
    Lambert, H.
    Fekete, Adam
    Kermode, J. R.
    De Vita, A.
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 232 : 256 - 263
  • [45] Atomistic investigation of hydrogen induced decohesion of Ni grain boundaries
    Li, Jiaqing
    Lu, Cheng
    Pei, Linqing
    Zhang, Che
    Wang, Rui
    MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 2020, 150
  • [46] Atomistic modeling of point defects and diffusion in copper grain boundaries
    Suzuki, A
    Mishin, Y
    INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2003, 11 (01) : 131 - 148
  • [47] Atomistic simulations of the interaction of alloying elements with grain boundaries in Mg
    Huber, Liam
    Rottler, Joerg
    Militzer, Matthias
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2014, 80 : 194 - 204
  • [48] Atomic collision cascades in vanadium crystallites with grain boundaries
    Psakhie, S. G.
    Zolnikov, K. P.
    Kryzhevich, D. S.
    Zheleznyakov, A. V.
    Chernov, V. M.
    PHYSICAL MESOMECHANICS, 2009, 12 (1-2) : 20 - 28
  • [49] HELIUM FLUX TO GRAIN-BOUNDARIES DURING IRRADIATION
    FOREMAN, AJE
    SINGH, BN
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 1987, 149 (02) : 266 - 268
  • [50] HELIUM BUBBLES AT GRAIN-BOUNDARIES IN AN AUSTENITIC ALLOY
    LANE, PL
    GOODHEW, PJ
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 1984, 122 (1-3) : 509 - 513