Modulatory effects of static magnetic fields on blood pressure in rabbits

被引:47
|
作者
Okano, H
Ohkubo, C
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Physiol Hyg, Minato Ku, Tokyo 1088638, Japan
[2] Pip Tokyo Co Ltd, Dept Sci, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Ca2+; channel blocker; nitric oxide synthase inhibitor; rabbit ear lobe;
D O I
10.1002/bem.68
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Acute effects of locally applied static magnetic fields (SMF) on pharmacologically altered blood pressure (BP) in a central artery of the ear lobe of a conscious rabbit were evaluated. Hypotensive and vasodilator actions were induced by a Ca2+ channel blocker, nicardipine (NIC). Hypertensive and vasoconstrictive actions were induced by a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, N-omega-vitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). The hemodynamic changes in the artery exposed to SMF were measured continuously and analyzed by penetrating microphotoelectric plethysmography (MPPG). Concurrently, BP changes in a central artery contralateral to that of the exposed ear lobe were monitored. SMF intensity was 1 mT and the duration of exposure was 30 min. A total of 180 experimental trials were carried out in 34 healthy adult male rabbits weighing 2.6-3.8 kg. Six experimental procedures were chosen at random: (1) sham exposure without pharmacological treatment; (2) SMF exposure alone; (3) decreased BP induced by a single intravenous (iv) bolus injection of NIC (100 muM/kg) without SMF exposure; (4) decreased BP induced by injection of NIC with SMF exposure; (5) increased BP induced by a constant iv infusion of L-NAME (10 mM/kg/h) without SMF exposure; (6) increased BP induced by infusion of L-NAME with SMF exposure. The results demonstrated that SMF significantly reduced the vasodilatation with enhanced vasomotion and antagonized the reduction of BP via NIC-blocked Ca2+ channels in vascular smooth muscle cells. In addition, SMF significantly attenuated the vasoconstriction and suppressed the elevation of BP via NOS inhibition in vascular endothelial cells and/or central nervous system neurons. These results suggest that these modulatory effects of SMF on BP might, in part, involve a feedback control system for alteration in NOS activity in conjunction with modulation of Ca2+ dynamics. Bioelectromagnetics 22:408-418, 2001. (C)2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 418
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECTS OF STATIC MAGNETIC-FIELDS ON ERYTHROCYTE RHEOLOGY
    HIGASHI, T
    YAMAGISHI, A
    TAKEUCHI, T
    DATE, M
    BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY AND BIOENERGETICS, 1995, 36 (02): : 101 - 108
  • [32] EFFECTS OF STATIC MAGNETIC-FIELDS ON ISOLATED NEURONS
    AZANZA, MJ
    DELMORAL, A
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE, 1988, 49 (C-8): : 2059 - 2060
  • [33] Effects of static magnetic fields on primary cortical neurons
    Mello, AP
    Farrell, E
    Prendergast, PJ
    Campbell, V
    Coey, JMD
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2005, T118 : 205 - 207
  • [34] Effects of neck exposure to 5.5 mT static magnetic field on pharmacologically modulated blood pressure in concious rabbits (vol 26, pg 469, 2005)
    Okano, H
    Ohkubo, C
    BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2006, 27 (03) : 245 - 245
  • [35] EEG AND BLOOD-PRESSURE EFFECTS OF TRH IN RABBITS
    BEALE, JS
    WHITE, RP
    HUANG, SP
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1977, 16 (7-8) : 499 - 506
  • [36] No modulatory effects by transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of human motor and somatosensory cortex
    Kufner, Marco
    Brueckner, Sabrina
    Kammer, Thomas
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (03) : 703 - 710
  • [37] The blood pressure of rabbits
    Koch, E
    Koller, S
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR BIOLOGIE, 1932, 92 (03): : 202 - 208
  • [38] A RABBITS BLOOD PRESSURE
    不详
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1953, 1 (4815): : 895 - 895
  • [39] Effects of Static Magnetic Fields on Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor Function
    Fernanda Tolosa, Maria
    Bouzat, Cecilia
    Ruben Cravero, Walter
    BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2011, 32 (06) : 434 - 442
  • [40] Effects of Static Magnetic Fields on the Antioxidant System of Almond Seeds
    F. Abdollahi
    H. Amiri
    V. Niknam
    F. Ghanati
    K. Mahdigholi
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2019, 66 : 299 - 307