The optimal percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a pairwise and network meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Hu, Meng-Jin [1 ]
Tan, Jiang-Shan [1 ]
Jiang, Wen-Yang [1 ]
Gao, Xiao-Jin [1 ]
Yang, Yue-Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
关键词
multivessel disease; multivessel revascularization; network meta-analysis; percutaneous coronary intervention; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; CULPRIT-ONLY REVASCULARIZATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY; TASK-FORCE; VESSEL; THROMBOLYSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; CARDIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/20406223221078088
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods: Trials that randomized patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease to immediate multivessel PCI, staged multivessel PCI, or culprit-only PCI and prospective observational studies that investigated all-cause death were included. Random effect risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results: A total of 13 randomized trials with 7627 patients and 21 prospective observational studies with 60311 patients were included. In the pairwise and network meta-analysis based on randomized trials, immediate or staged multivessel PCI was associated with a lower risk of long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE; RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.74) than culprit-only PCI, which was mainly due to lower risks of myocardial infarction (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.88) and revascularization (RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.51), without any significant difference in all-cause death (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.04; I-2 =0.0%). However, short-term outcomes were deficient in randomized trials. The results from real-world prospective observational studies suggested that staged multivessel PCI reduced long-term all-cause death (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.71; I-2 =15.6%), whereas immediate multivessel PCI increased short-term all-cause death (RR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.22 to 2.05; I-2 = 43 .8%) relative to culprit-only PCI. Conclusion: For patients in randomized trials, multivessel PCI in an immediate or staged procedure was preferred due to improvements in long-term outcomes. As a supplement, the results in real-world patients derived from prospective observational studies suggested that staged multivessel PCI was superior to immediate multivessel PCI. Therefore, staged multivessel PCI may be the optimal PCI strategy for patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Banning, Amerjeet S.
    Gershlick, Anthony H.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (09)
  • [32] Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Amerjeet S. Banning
    Anthony H. Gershlick
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2015, 17
  • [33] Management of multivessel coronary disease detected at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: preliminary analysis
    Pedro Magalhaes, P.
    Leao, S.
    Cordeiro, F.
    Ribeiro, H.
    Seca, L.
    Carvalho, S.
    Sousa, P.
    Moreira, J. I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2015, 17 : 366 - 366
  • [34] Complete revascularization for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Bajraktari, Gani
    Jashari, Haki
    Ibrahimi, Pranvera
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Jashari, Fisnik
    Ndrepepa, Gjin
    Elezi, Shpend
    Henein, Michael Y.
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2018, 29 (03) : 204 - 215
  • [35] Meta-Analysis of Optimal Revascularization Strategy for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Shah, Rahman
    Nayyar, Mannu
    Le, Francis K.
    Labroo, Ajay
    Davis, Donnie A.
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Kandzari, David E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 129 : 19 - 24
  • [36] Optimal timing of delayed percutaneous coronary intervention in stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Zhao, Q.
    Xu, H.
    Lv, J.
    Zhao, Y.
    Yang, Y.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 2524 - 2524
  • [37] Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as a National Reperfusion Strategy in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Terkelsen, Christian J.
    Jensen, Lisette O.
    Tilsted, Hans H.
    Thaysen, Per
    Ravkilde, Jan
    Johnsen, Soren P.
    Trautner, Sven
    Andersen, Henning R.
    Thuesen, Leif
    Lassen, Jens F.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (06) : 570 - 576
  • [38] Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Gao, Lei
    Hu, Xin
    Liu, Yu-Qi
    Xue, Qiao
    Feng, Quan-Zhou
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2014, 9 : 1241 - 1246
  • [39] Meta-Analysis of Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Coronary Disease
    Jang, Jae-Sik
    Jin, Han-Young
    Seo, Jeong-Sook
    Yang, Tae-Hyun
    Kim, Dae-Kyeong
    Kim, Dong-Soo
    Cho, Kyoung-Im
    Kim, Bo-Hyun
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Je, Hyung-Gon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (08): : 1027 - 1032
  • [40] Advances in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Aragon, Joseph R.
    Shenoda, Michael M.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 23 : 19 - 23