Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequences

被引:47
|
作者
Berntsen, Jorgen [1 ]
Rimestad, Jens [1 ]
Lassen, Jacob Theilgaard [1 ]
Tran, Dang [2 ]
Kragh, Mikkel Fly [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vitrolife AS, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Harrison AI, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
PREDICTIVE TOOL; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY; IMPLANTATION; MORPHOLOGY; ANEUPLOIDY; MODEL; MORPHOKINETICS; CLASSIFICATION; INCUBATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0262661
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Assessing and selecting the most viable embryos for transfer is an essential part of in vitro fertilization (IVF). In recent years, several approaches have been made to improve and automate the procedure using artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning. Based on images of embryos with known implantation data (KID), AI models have been trained to automatically score embryos related to their chance of achieving a successful implantation. However, as of now, only limited research has been conducted to evaluate how embryo selection models generalize to new clinics and how they perform in subgroup analyses across various conditions. In this paper, we investigate how a deep learning-based embryo selection model using only time-lapse image sequences performs across different patient ages and clinical conditions, and how it correlates with traditional morphokinetic parameters. The model was trained and evaluated based on a large dataset from 18 IVF centers consisting of 115,832 embryos, of which 14,644 embryos were transferred KID embryos. In an independent test set, the AI model sorted KID embryos with an area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67 and all embryos with an AUC of 0.95. A clinic hold-out test showed that the model generalized to new clinics with an AUC range of 0.60-0.75 for KID embryos. Across different subgroups of age, insemination method, incubation time, and transfer protocol, the AUC ranged between 0.63 and 0.69. Furthermore, model predictions correlated positively with blastocyst grading and negatively with direct cleavages. The fully automated iDAScore v1.0 model was shown to perform at least as good as a state-of-the-art manual embryo selection model. Moreover, full automatization of embryo scoring implies fewer manual evaluations and eliminates biases due to inter- and intraobserver variation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tracking neural stem cells in time-lapse microscopy image sequences
    Althoff, K
    Degerman, J
    Gustavsson, T
    Medical Imaging 2005: Image Processing, Pt 1-3, 2005, 5747 : 1883 - 1891
  • [22] APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY TO INCREASE THE EFFICACY OF EMBRYO SELECTION AND PREDICTION OF LIVE BIRTH USING HUMAN BLASTOCYSTS CULTURED IN A TIME-LAPSE INCUBATOR.
    Zaninovic, N.
    Rocha, C. J.
    Zhan, Q.
    Toschi, M.
    Malmsten, J.
    Nogueira, M.
    Meseguer, M.
    Rosenwaks, Z.
    Hickman, C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E372 - E373
  • [23] The impact of time-lapse assessment on nuclearity: is multinucleation a proper character for embryo selection
    Azzarello, A.
    Hoest, T.
    Mikkelsen, A. L.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [24] Heart rate measurement based on a time-lapse image
    Takano, Chihiro
    Ohta, Yuji
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2007, 29 (08) : 853 - 857
  • [25] CLINICAL VALIDATION OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODEL FOR EMBRYO EVALUATION ACROSS TWO TIME-LAPSE IMAGING SYSTEMS.
    Curchoe, C. L.
    Shapiro, M.
    Gilboa, D.
    Tauber, Y.
    Seidman, D. S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 122 (01) : E22 - E22
  • [26] Improving embryo selection by development of laboratory-adapted Time-lapse model
    Blais, I.
    Lahav-Baratz, S.
    Koifman, M.
    Feferkorn, I.
    Dirnfeldi, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 102 - 102
  • [27] IMPROVED EMBRYO SELECTION ACCURACY USING CELL DIVISION CHARACTERISTICS DEFINED BY TIME-LAPSE AND AUTOMATED IMAGE ANALYSIS
    Chen, A. A.
    Ivani, K.
    Conaghan, J.
    Gvakharia, M.
    Le, A.
    Shen, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (03) : S17 - S17
  • [28] Automatic morphological grading of human blastocysts with time-lapse imaging and artificial intelligence
    Kragh, M. F.
    Rimestad, J.
    Berntsen, J.
    Karstoft, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 71 - 71
  • [29] The World of Embryo Morphokinetics of Time-Lapse Systems
    Franco, Jose Goncalves, Jr.
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2015, 19 (02): : 36 - 36
  • [30] A pilot randomized controlled trial of Day 3 single embryo transfer with adjunctive time-lapse selection versus Day 5 single embryo transfer with or without adjunctive time-lapse selection
    Kaser, Daniel J.
    Bormann, Charles L.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Farland, Leslie V.
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.
    Racowsky, Catherine
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (08) : 1598 - 1603