Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems' Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating

被引:3
|
作者
Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu [1 ]
Ghiga, Dana-Valentina [1 ]
Serbanoiu, Dan-Cosmin [1 ]
Moldovan, Marioara [2 ]
Cuc, Stanca [2 ]
Pacurar, Mariana [1 ]
Pollmann, Maria Cristina Figueiredo [3 ]
机构
[1] GEP Univ Med Pharm Sci & Technol Targu Mures, Fac Dent Med, Targu Mures 540139, Romania
[2] Babes Bolyai Univ, Raluca Ripan Chem Res Inst, Cluj Napoca 400294, Romania
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Dent Med, P-4200393 Porto, Portugal
关键词
shear bond strength; adhesion; active self-ligating brackets; passive self-ligating brackets; conventional brackets; tensile strength; maximum load; testing machine; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; BASE DESIGN; ENAMEL; TOOTH;
D O I
10.3390/dj10100196
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Adhesion remains a key element in dentistry, whether approached in prosthetics, odontology, or orthodontics. It is a continuously researched aspect, as improved materials and adhesive methods keep emerging in the market. No orthodontic treatment can be effective without the proper adhesion strength of the bonded elements on the teeth. The objective of this research, in the broad context of self-ligating versus conventional brackets, was to compare active and passive self-ligating systems with a conventional one by conducting an in vitro study on human-extracted premolars. Shear bond strength tests were executed by means of an advanced materials-testing machine that generated maximum load and tensile strength values. The data obtained underwent statistical analysis with a statistical threshold of p < 0.05. The results regarding the statistical significance were acquired when comparing the passive self-ligating system with the active self-ligating and conventional systems (load-at-maximum-load mean 204.9, SD 91.09, and p < 0.05). In this study, the passive self-ligating bracket system appears to present increased shear bond strength.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bond Strength Comparison of Two Self-Ligating Brackets with A Conventional Bracket
    Basaran, Guvenc
    Ozer, Torun
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 22 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [2] Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems' Kinetic Friction: Conventional and Self-Ligating
    Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu
    Serbanoiu, Dan-Cosmin
    Ghiga, Dana-Valentina
    Moldovan, Marioara
    Cuc, Stanca
    Pollmann, Maria Cristina Figueiredo
    Pacurar, Mariana
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (12)
  • [3] Comparative evaluation of efficacy of self-ligating interactive bracket with conventional preadjusted bracket: A clinical study
    Jayachandran, Balajee
    Padmanabhan, Ratna
    Vijayalakshmi, Devaki
    Padmanabhan, Janardhanam
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (02) : 158 - 162
  • [4] Comparative Efficacy of Self-ligating Bracket Systems versus Conventional Bracket Systems in Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review
    Kambale, Sahil Sunil
    Handa, Amit
    Mane, Dipali
    Akansha, Katkar
    Srivastava, Himanshu
    Sarda, Aditi
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2025, 15 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [5] Self-Ligating Bracket Systems: A Comprehensive Review
    Baxi, Shalabh
    Tripathi, Anand A.
    Bhatia, Virag
    Dubey, Mangleshwar Prasad
    Kumar, Pratiksha
    Bagde, Hiroj
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [6] In vitro evaluation of resistance to sliding in self-ligating and conventional bracket systems during dental alignment
    Cordasco, Giancarlo
    Lo Giudice, Antonino
    Militi, Angela
    Nucera, Riccardo
    Triolo, Giuseppe
    Matarese, Giovanni
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 42 (04) : 218 - 224
  • [7] Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket
    Liu, Yudong
    Guo, Longmei
    Feng, Yanqing
    Hua, Jiahao
    Dai, Qingyuan
    Chen, Ziyang
    Song, Wenlu
    Guo, Bing
    Chen, Taicong
    Ji, Li
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [8] Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems
    Dalstra, Michel
    Eriksen, Henrik
    Bergamini, Chiara
    Melsen, Birte
    JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 42 (02) : 103 - 113
  • [9] Self-ligating bracket claims
    Marshall, Steven D.
    Currier, G. Frans
    Hatch, Nan E.
    Huang, Greg J.
    Nah, Hyun-Duck
    Owens, Shannon E.
    Shroff, Bhavna
    Southard, Thomas E.
    Suri, Lokesh
    Turpin, David L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 138 (02) : 128 - 131
  • [10] A comparative anchorage control study between conventional and self-ligating bracket systems using differential moments
    de Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues
    Herrero, Francisco
    Fattal, Amine
    Davoody, Amirparviz R.
    Nanda, Ravindra
    Uribe, Flavio
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (06) : 937 - 942