Behavioral differences among fourteen inbred mouse strains commonly used as disease models

被引:0
|
作者
Bothe, GWM
Bolivar, VJ
Vedder, MJ
Geistfeld, JG
机构
[1] Tacon Farms, Germantown, NY 12526 USA
[2] Wadsworth Ctr, Genom Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
We compared the behavior of 14 inbred mouse strains and an F1 hybrid commonly used in transgenic and knockout production. These strains were 129P3/J, 129S1/SvImJ, 12956/SvEvTac, 129T2/SvEmsJ, 129X1/SvJ (formerly 129/J, 129/Sv-p(+)Tyr(+)Kitl(+)/J, 129/SvEvTac, 129SvEmsJ, and 129/SvJ, respectively), A/JCrTac, BALB/cAnNTac, C3H/HeNTac, C57BL/6J, C57BL/6NTac, DBA/2NTac, FVB/NTac, NOD/MrkTac, SJIJJCrNTac, and the hybrid B6129S6FITac. Performance in three behavioral tests (rotorod, open-field activity-habituation, and contextual and cued fear conditioning) was determined. On the rotorod assay, SJIJJCrNTac mice had the shortest latencies to fall on the first day of testing, and DBA/2NTac mice showed impaired motor learning. Open-field behavior was analyzed using the parameters total distance, center distance, velocity, and vertical activity. 129T2/EvEmsJ and A/JCrTac were least active in the open field, whereas NOD/MrkTac mice were most active. Contrary to earlier studies, we found that all strains habituated to the open field in at least one of these parameters. In contextual and cued fear conditioning, all strains displayed activity suppression. However, FVB/NTac mice reacted less strongly to both context and cue than did most of the other strains. There were no significant behavioral differences between C57131/6J and C57BL/6NTac, except for higher open-field activity in C57BL/6J female mice. These findings illustrate the importance of the appropriate selection of background strain for transgenic, gene targeting, or drug research.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 334
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unusual behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains - Commentary
    Crawley, JN
    TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1996, 19 (05) : 181 - 182
  • [22] Influence of genetic background on ex vivo and in vivo cardiac function in several commonly used inbred mouse strains
    Barnabei, Matthew S.
    Palpant, Nathan J.
    Metzger, Joseph M.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS, 2010, 42A (02) : 103 - 113
  • [23] Superovulation Strategies for 6 Commonly Used Mouse Strains
    Luo, Charlie
    Zuniga, Juliana
    Edison, Earnessa
    Palla, Shana
    Dong, Wenli
    Parker-Thornburg, Jan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 50 (04): : 471 - 478
  • [24] DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN MYELINISATION IN MOUSE RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAINS
    Goudriaan, A.
    Smit, A.
    Verheijen, M.
    GLIA, 2011, 59 : S60 - S60
  • [25] ESTIMATES OF HISTOCOMPATIBILITY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INBRED MOUSE STRAINS
    GRAFF, RJ
    BROWN, DH
    IMMUNOGENETICS, 1978, 7 (04) : 367 - 373
  • [26] Commonly used mouse strains have distinct vascular properties
    Steppan, Jochen
    Jandu, Sandeep
    Wang, Huilei
    Kang, Sara
    Savage, William
    Narayanan, Roshini
    Nandakumar, Kavitha
    Santhanam, Lakshmi
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2020, 43 (11) : 1175 - 1181
  • [27] Commonly used mouse strains have distinct vascular properties
    Jochen Steppan
    Sandeep Jandu
    Huilei Wang
    Sara Kang
    William Savage
    Roshini Narayanan
    Kavitha Nandakumar
    Lakshmi Santhanam
    Hypertension Research, 2020, 43 : 1175 - 1181
  • [28] Ebola Virus Infection in Commonly Used Laboratory Mouse Strains
    Haddock, Elaine
    Feldmann, Heinz
    Marzi, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 218 : S453 - S457
  • [29] DIFFERENCES IN SPONTANEOUS BEHAVIOR AMONG INBRED STRAINS OF MICE
    VANDERPOOL, DL
    DAVIS, RT
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1962, 10 (01) : 123 - 130
  • [30] DIFFERENCES IN ALCOHOL PREFERENCE AMONG INBRED STRAINS OF MICE
    MCCLEARN, GE
    RODGERS, DA
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1959, 20 (04): : 691 - 695