The Two Different Isoforms of the RSC Chromatin Remodeling Complex Play Distinct Roles in DNA Damage Responses

被引:26
|
作者
Chambers, Anna L. [1 ]
Brownlee, Peter M. [1 ]
Durley, Samuel C. [2 ]
Beacham, Tracey [2 ]
Kent, Nicholas A. [2 ]
Downs, Jessica A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Med Res Council Genome Damage & Stabil Ctr, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Sch Biosci, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 02期
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
STRAND BREAK REPAIR; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; CHECKPOINT; GENE; ADAPTATION; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0032016
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The RSC chromatin remodeling complex has been implicated in contributing to DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in a number of studies. Both survival and levels of H2A phosphorylation in response to damage are reduced in the absence of RSC. Importantly, there is evidence for two isoforms of this complex, defined by the presence of either Rsc1 or Rsc2. Here, we investigated whether the two isoforms of RSC provide distinct contributions to DNA damage responses. First, we established that the two isoforms of RSC differ in the presence of Rsc1 or Rsc2 but otherwise have the same subunit composition. We found that both rsc1 and rsc2 mutant strains have intact DNA damage-induced checkpoint activity and transcriptional induction. In addition, both strains show reduced non-homologous end joining activity and have a similar spectrum of DSB repair junctions, suggesting perhaps that the two complexes provide the same functions. However, the hypersensitivity of a rsc1 strain cannot be complemented with an extra copy of RSC2, and likewise, the hypersensitivity of the rsc2 strain remains unchanged when an additional copy of RSC1 is present, indicating that the two proteins are unable to functionally compensate for one another in DNA damage responses. Rsc1, but not Rsc2, is required for nucleosome sliding flanking a DNA DSB. Interestingly, while swapping the domains from Rsc1 into the Rsc2 protein does not compromise hypersensitivity to DNA damage suggesting they are functionally interchangeable, the BAH domain from Rsc1 confers upon Rsc2 the ability to remodel chromatin at a DNA break. These data demonstrate that, despite the similarity between Rsc1 and Rsc2, the two different isoforms of RSC provide distinct functions in DNA damage responses, and that at least part of the functional specificity is dictated by the BAH domains.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Two Lactococcus lactis thioredoxin paralogues play different roles in responses to arsenate and oxidative stress
    Efler, Petr
    Kilstrup, Mogens
    Johnsen, Stig
    Svensson, Birte
    Hagglund, Per
    MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2015, 161 : 528 - 538
  • [32] Different roles of the Mre11 complex in the DNA damage response in Aspergillus nidulans
    Semighini, CP
    Fagundes, MRVK
    Ferreira, JC
    Pascon, RC
    Goldman, MHD
    Goldman, GH
    MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (06) : 1693 - 1709
  • [33] Two budding yeast RAD4 homologs in fission yeast play different roles in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage
    Fukumoto, Y
    Hiyama, H
    Yokoi, M
    Nakaseko, Y
    Yanagida, M
    Hanaoka, F
    DNA REPAIR, 2002, 1 (10) : 833 - 845
  • [34] Checkpoint kinases and the INO80 nucleosome remodeling complex enhance global chromatin mobility in response to DNA damage
    Seeber, Andrew
    Dion, Vincent
    Gasser, Susan M.
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 27 (18) : 1999 - 2008
  • [35] Sth1, the ATPase subunit of the RSC chromatin remodeler has important roles in stress response and DNA damage repair in the pathogenic fungi Candida albicans
    Prasad, Priya
    Joshi, Ankita
    Ghosh, Santanu K.
    MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS, 2022, 166
  • [36] High throughput gene sequencing reveals altered landscape in DNA damage responses and chromatin remodeling in sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Ji, Shunrong
    Yang, Wenting
    Liu, Jiang
    Zhao, Jingjing
    Chen, Liang
    Ni, Quanxing
    Long, Jiang
    Yu, Xianjun
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2018, 18 (03) : 318 - 327
  • [37] Male-specific Fruitless isoforms have different regulatory roles conferred by distinct zinc finger DNA binding domains
    Dalton, Justin E.
    Fear, Justin M.
    Knott, Simon
    Baker, Bruce S.
    McIntyre, Lauren M.
    Arbeitman, Michelle N.
    BMC GENOMICS, 2013, 14
  • [38] Male-specific Fruitless isoforms have different regulatory roles conferred by distinct zinc finger DNA binding domains
    Justin E Dalton
    Justin M Fear
    Simon Knott
    Bruce S Baker
    Lauren M McIntyre
    Michelle N Arbeitman
    BMC Genomics, 14
  • [39] Two Distinct DNA Binding Modes Guide Dual Roles of a CRISPR-Cas Protein Complex
    Blosser, Timothy R.
    Loeff, Luuk
    Westra, Edze R.
    Vlot, Marnix
    Kunne, Tim
    Sobota, Malgorzata
    Dekker, Cees
    Brouns, Stan J. J.
    Joo, Chirlmin
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2015, 58 (01) : 60 - 70
  • [40] Saccharomyces cerevisiae Med9 comprises two functionally distinct domains that play different roles in transcriptional regulation
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    Kasahara, Koji
    Kokubo, Tetsuro
    GENES TO CELLS, 2009, 14 (01) : 53 - 67