What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study

被引:25
|
作者
Kehl, S. [1 ]
Schmidt, U. [1 ]
Spaich, S. [1 ,2 ]
Schild, R. L. [3 ]
Suetterlin, M. [1 ,2 ]
Siemer, J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Mannheim, Germany
[2] Frankenthal Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Frankenthal, Germany
[3] Diakonie Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hannover, Germany
[4] Ludmillenstift Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Meppen, Germany
关键词
fetal biometry; fetal weight estimation; newborn; regression analysis; weight formula; PREDICTING BIRTH-WEIGHT; SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; FORMULAS; MACROSOMIA; FETUSES; COMBINATION; EXAMINERS; VOLUMETRY; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1002/uog.10094
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective Commonly used formulae for fetal weight estimation, including combinations of several biometric parameters, lack accuracy despite efforts to improve them. This study aimed to investigate the limits of fetal weight estimation based on conventional biometric parameters on two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound by developing and evaluating new weight equations using postpartum biometric parameters. Methods This was a prospective multicenter study including 628 singleton pregnancies at term. Inclusion criteria were healthy newborns with no physical or chromosomal malformations. Postpartum measurement of head circumference, abdominal circumference and thigh length was performed. Six best-fit formulae were derived using forward regression analysis in a formula-finding group (n = 419), and their accuracy was compared with birth weight in an evaluation group (n = 209) using percentage error, absolute percentage error, limits of agreement and the proportion of weight estimations falling within a discrepancy level of +/- 10%. Results The new formulae showed no systematic error, with SD for the percentage error between 7.42 and 8.77 and no significant differences between median absolute percentage errors (4.845.71). They included 74.681.3% of neonates within a discrepancy level of 10%. With regard to the 95% limits of agreement, weight estimates were within a range of about +/- 500 g. Conclusion These results show that a good sonographic weight formula has the following features: no systematic error, an SD of about 7% and inclusion of 80% of cases within a discrepancy level of 10%. The study indicates that the current accuracy of fetal weight estimation with conventional biometric parameters by 2D ultrasound has reached its limits. Further improvement will probably only be achieved through new approaches in ultrasonography. Copyright (c) 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:543 / 548
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] FEASIBILITY AND ACCURACY OF THE NOVEL THREE-DIMENSIONAL CAROTID ULTRASOUND TECHNIQUE: COMPARISON WITH TWO-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND AND CAROTID CT ANGIOGRAPHY
    Heo, Ran
    Chang, Hyuk-Jae
    Cho, In-Jeong
    Park, Jinki
    Lee, Jinyong
    Shim, Chi Young
    Hong, Geu-Ru
    Chung, Namsik
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 1655 - 1655
  • [12] Abdominal exercises affect inter-rectus distance in postpartum women: a two-dimensional ultrasound study
    Sancho, M. F.
    Pascoal, A. G.
    Mota, P.
    Bo, K.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2015, 101 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [13] PROSPECTIVE-STUDY ON FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION USING LIMB CIRCUMFERENCES OBTAINED BY 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND
    FAVRE, R
    BADER, AM
    NISAND, G
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 6 (02) : 140 - 144
  • [14] Feasibility of two-dimensional ultrasound shear wave elastography of human fetal lungs and liver: A pilot study
    Mottet, N.
    Cochet, C.
    Vidal, C.
    Metz, J. P.
    Aubry, S.
    Bourtembourg, A.
    Eckman-Lacroix, A.
    Riethmuller, D.
    Pazart, L.
    Ramanah, R.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2020, 101 (02) : 69 - 78
  • [15] Contrast sonography for uterine cavity assessment: A comparison of conventional two-dimensional with three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound a pilot study
    Ayida, G
    Kennedy, S
    Barlow, D
    Chamberlain, P
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 66 (05) : 848 - 850
  • [16] FETAL ATRIOVENTRICULAR VALVE INSUFFICIENCY ASSOCIATED WITH NONIMMUNE HYDROPS - A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC AND PULSED DOPPLER ULTRASOUND STUDY
    SILVERMAN, NH
    KLEINMAN, CS
    RUDOLPH, AM
    COPEL, JA
    WEINSTEIN, EM
    ENDERLEIN, MA
    GOLBUS, M
    CIRCULATION, 1985, 72 (04) : 825 - 832
  • [17] Sonographic assessment of the fetal anatomy in the first trimester: a comparative study of the accuracy of two- and three-dimensional ultrasound
    Savoia, F.
    Giudicepietro, A.
    Minnella, G.
    Fantasia, I.
    Sarno, L.
    Quaresima, P.
    Gerbino, M.
    Volpe, G.
    Mantovani, E.
    Dall' Asta, A.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 144 - 145
  • [18] Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods
    Lindell, G.
    Marsal, K.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (03) : 295 - 300
  • [19] Comparison between a novel 2D-3D ultrasound system (Accuro®) and conventional two-dimensional ultrasound for assessment of the lumbar spine: a prospective cohort study in volunteers
    Caicedo, Juliana
    Balki, Mrinalini
    Arzola, Cristian
    Siddiqui, Naveed
    Ye, Xiang Y.
    Downey, Kristy
    Carvalho, Jose C. A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2021, 68 (11): : 1711 - 1712
  • [20] Is conventional two-dimensional ultrasound still relevant in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes? DIACAR: a prospective observational study
    Ben Hamou, A.
    Henon, Y. Anatakly
    Alamri, A.
    Chatellier, G.
    Banu, I.
    Garcon, P.
    Voican, A.
    Moeuf, Y.
    Oriez, C.
    Aroulanda, M.
    Abassade, P.
    Fumery, M.
    Komajda, M.
    Cador, R.
    Dupuy, O.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2020, 63 (SUPPL 1) : S428 - S428