The microbial community in the rhizosphere determined by community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) and direct soil- and cfu-PLFA techniques

被引:103
|
作者
Söderberg, KH
Probanza, A
Jumpponen, A
Bååth, E
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Microbial Ecol, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Ecol, Sect Soil Sci, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Agr Res No Sweden, Crop Sci Sect, SE-90403 Umea, Sweden
[4] Univ San Pablo, CEU, Fac Ciencias Expt Salud, Dept Ciencies Ambientales & Recursos Nat, Madrid 28668, Spain
关键词
rhizosphere; microbial community structure; PLFA; CLPP;
D O I
10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.08.005
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The composition of the microbial community in the rhizosphere was investigated using three different techniques: direct soil-phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA), cfu-PLFA (using culturable, bacteria only) and community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) using Biolog GN microtitre plates. All three techniques showed that the rhizosphere bacterial community differed from the bulk soil community, when pea plants were grown in pots. The two PLFA techniques also indicated that the effect of roots on microbial communities was greater than differences in the PLFA pattern between different bulk soils. The difference was most prominent using the direct soil-PLFA technique. Both PLFA techniques indicated that gram-negative bacteria were relatively more abundant in the rhizosphere, while PLFAs indicative of gram-positive bacteria were relatively more common in bulk soil samples. The results obtained with the direct soil-PLFA method did not differ between rhizosphere samples taken along a pea root, while this was the case with both the cfu-PLFA technique and the CUP method. According to both techniques, the differences in community composition were greatest near the root tip. Different plant species exhibited different microbial community composition in the rhizosphere, as judged from all three methods, when four different plant species were compared. In all cases, Trifolium differed most from the other species (three different grasses). Although all three methods were found to be suitable for rhizosphere studies, the CLPP method appeared less suitable than the two PLFA methods, since less of the variation in the data could usually be explained. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 145
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Importance of pattern analysis in community-level physiological profiles (CLPP): a reply to the letter from P. J. A. Howard
    Garland, JL
    Mills, AL
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 31 (08): : 1201 - 1202
  • [32] Relative effectiveness of kinetic analysis vs single point readings for classifying environmental samples based on community-level physiological profiles (CLPP)
    Garland, JL
    Mills, AL
    Young, JS
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 33 (7-8): : 1059 - 1066
  • [33] Influence of cold storage on soil microbial community level physiological profiles and implications for soil quality monitoring
    Gonzalez-Quinones, Vanesa
    Banning, Natasha C.
    Jimenez Ballesta, Raimundo
    Murphy, Daniel V.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 41 (07): : 1574 - 1576
  • [34] Choice of methods for soil microbial community analysis: PLFA maximizes power compared to CLPP and PCR-based approaches
    Ramsey, Philip W.
    Rillig, Matthias C.
    Feris, Kevin P.
    Holben, William E.
    Gannon, James E.
    PEDOBIOLOGIA, 2006, 50 (03) : 275 - 280
  • [35] Microbial Biofilm Colonizing Plastic Substrates in the Ross Sea (Antarctica): First Overview of Community-Level Physiological Profiles
    Caruso, Gabriella
    Maimone, Giovanna
    Rappazzo, Alessandro Ciro
    Dell'Acqua, Ombretta
    Lagana, Pasqualina
    Azzaro, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (07)
  • [36] Effect of phenylurea herbicides on soil microbial communities estimated by analysis of 16S rRNA gene fingerprints and community-level physiological profiles
    El Fantroussi, S
    Verschuere, L
    Verstraete, W
    Top, EM
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 65 (03) : 982 - 988
  • [37] Soil Microbial Community-Level Physiological Profiling as Related to Carbon and Nitrogen Availability Under Different Land Uses
    Celina Zabaloy, Maria
    Garland, Jay L.
    Allegrini, Marco
    del Valle Gomez, Elena
    PEDOSPHERE, 2016, 26 (02) : 216 - 225
  • [38] Stability and carbon uptake of the soil microbial community is determined by differences between rhizosphere and bulk soil
    Lange, Markus
    Azizi-Rad, Mina
    Dittmann, Georg
    Lange, Dan Frederik
    Orme, Alice May
    Schroeter, Simon Andreas
    Simon, Carsten
    Gleixner, Gerd
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2024, 189
  • [39] Monitoring soil bacteria with community-level physiological profiles using Biolog™ ECO-plates in the Netherlands and Europe
    Rutgers, Michiel
    Wouterse, Marja
    Drost, Sytske M.
    Breure, Anton M.
    Mulder, Christian
    Stone, Dorothy
    Creamer, Rachel E.
    Winding, Anne
    Bloem, Jaap
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2016, 97 : 23 - 35
  • [40] Community-Level Physiological Profiling of Microbial Communities in Constructed Wetlands: Effects of Sample Preparation
    Button, Mark
    Weber, Kela
    Nivala, Jaime
    Aubron, Thomas
    Mueller, Roland Arno
    APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 178 (05) : 960 - 973