In situ measurements of effective diameter and effective droplet number concentration

被引:18
|
作者
Korolev, AV
Isaac, GA
Strapp, JW
Nevzorov, AN
机构
[1] Atmospher Environm Serv, Cloud Phys Res Div, Downsview, ON M3H 5T4, Canada
[2] Cent Aerol Observ, Dolgoprudnyi 141700, Russia
关键词
D O I
10.1029/1998JD200071
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The effective diameter of cloud droplets is usually derived from measurements of droplet size distribution measured by Particle Measuring Systems (PMS) probes. The disadvantage of this method is that PMS probes have a truncated size range. During the RACE project, an alternative method to measure the effective diameter used a cloud extinction meter and King and Nevzorov hot wire liquid water content and total water content (LWC/ TWC) probes installed on the National Research Council (NRC) Twin Otter. The effective diameter was derived from direct in situ measurements of the extinction coefficient (epsilon) and liquid water content (W) as D-eff=k(1)W/epsilon. This method of calculation of D-eff is free of problems related to deriving D-eff from the truncated particle size distribution, Since measurements of epsilon and W cover the whole size range of cloud particles, this method gives an accurate value of D-eff. This method can also be successfully applied for mixed and ice phase clouds, since the Nevzorov TWC probe provides measurements of total (ice plus liquid) water content. Effective number concentration was calculated as N-eff=k(2)epsilon(3)/W-2. Comparisons of D-eff and N-eff, calculated by this method, and directly from PMS Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP) spectra, are favorable in the subset of conditions when the FSSP is considered to measure the spectra fully and accurately.
引用
收藏
页码:3993 / 4003
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effective concentration of electrons in metals upon measurements via positron annihilation spectroscopy
    Grafutin V.I.
    Prokopiev E.P.
    Khmelevsky N.O.
    Journal of Surface Investigation: X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques, 2017, 11 (1) : 120 - 124
  • [42] On the Convexity of the Effective Reproduction Number
    Tavori, Jhonatan
    Levy, Hanoch
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (07) : 783 - 795
  • [43] Supplementing the effective number of parties
    Taagepera, R
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 1999, 18 (04) : 497 - 504
  • [44] Calculations of effective atomic number
    Kaliman, Z.
    Orlic, N.
    Jelovica, I.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2007, 580 (01): : 40 - 42
  • [45] EFFECTIVE SIZE AND NUMBER OF COMPONENTS
    TAAGEPERA, R
    GROFMAN, B
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1981, 10 (01) : 63 - 81
  • [46] Determination of the droplet effective size and optical depth of cloudy media from polarimetric measurements: Theory
    Kokhanovsky, Alexander
    Weichert, Reiner
    Applied Optics, 2002, 41 (18): : 3650 - 3658
  • [47] Determination of the droplet effective size and optical depth of cloudy media from polarimetric measurements: theory
    Kokhanovsky, A
    Weichert, R
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2002, 41 (18) : 3650 - 3658
  • [48] INTRINSIC CONCENTRATION, EFFECTIVE DENSITIES OF STATES, AND EFFECTIVE MASS IN SILICON
    GREEN, MA
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1990, 67 (06) : 2944 - 2954
  • [49] Analysis of concentration characteristics in ultrasonic atomization by droplet diameter distribution
    Yasuda, K
    Bando, Y
    Yamaguchi, S
    Nakamura, M
    Oda, A
    Kawase, Y
    ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 12 (1-2) : 37 - 41
  • [50] An evaluation of the liquid cloud droplet effective radius derived from MOMS, airborne remote sensing, and in situ measurements from CAMP2Ex
    Fu, Dongwei
    Di Girolamo, Larry
    Rauber, Robert M.
    McFarquhar, Greg M.
    Nesbitt, Stephen W.
    Loveridge, Jesse
    Hong, Yulan
    van Diedenhoven, Bastiaan
    Cairns, Brian
    Alexandrov, Mikhail D.
    Lawson, Paul
    Woods, Sarah
    Tanelli, Simone
    Schmidt, Sebastian
    Hostetler, Chris
    Scarino, Amy Jo
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2022, 22 (12) : 8259 - 8285