Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology (PIKKO) - evaluation of a supportive care intervention for overall oncological patients. Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial

被引:10
|
作者
Schneider, Nico [1 ]
Baecker, Anna [1 ]
Brenk-Franz, Katja [1 ]
Keinki, Christian [2 ]
Huebner, Jutta [3 ]
Brandt, Florian [4 ]
von der Winkel, Geraldine [4 ]
Hager, Lutz [5 ]
Strauss, Bernhard [1 ]
Altmann, Uwe [1 ]
机构
[1] Jena Univ Hosp, Inst Psychosocial Med & Psychotherapy, Stoystr 3, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[2] German Canc Soc, Kuno Fischer Str 8, D-14057 Berlin, Germany
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[4] IKK Sudwest, Berliner Promenade 1, D-66111 Saarbrucken, Germany
[5] Ze:roPraxen, Bodelschwinghstr 10-3, D-68723 Schwetzingen, Germany
关键词
Cancer; Oncology; Health competence; Information; Communication; Patient navigator; Specialized oncological counseling; Oncological knowledge database; Quality of life; Self-efficacy; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; MOBILE CANCER APPS; NURSE NAVIGATOR; DECISION-MAKING; BREAST-CANCER; HEALTH; PROGRAM; STANDARDIZATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-020-01002-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cancer patients have to undergo a difficult medical therapy and are also confronted with various psychological, social and economic problems. Support is available from many providers, but patients often gain no access to it. Accordingly, there is a need for a single point of contact that can provide advice, information and assistance. In the state of Saarland, Germany, a supportive new consulting and information path (PIKKO) for all types of cancer is currently evaluated by the German Cancer Society, the Cancer Society of the Saarland, three statutory health insurances and the Jena University Hospital. PIKKO is designed to improve quality of life, self-efficacy, health literacy and patient satisfaction and to reduce psychological distress, related health care costs and the days of inability to work. This methodical work presents the process and analysis planning of this evaluation. Methods The study population includes all cancer types, both new and existing diseases. PIKKO (with patient navigator, oncological knowledge database, specialized oncological counseling) is evaluated within a controlled, non-randomized, comparative, multicenter, longitudinal design. In addition to patient surveys, data from statutory health insurances and utilization data from the web database are collected, and interviews with patient navigators and doctors are carried out. Patients are assigned to a control (usual care) or an intervention group (u. c. + PIKKO). Primary outcome is the health related quality of life (SF-12) six months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy (GSE), psychological distress such as depression (PHQ-9) or anxiety (GAD-7), health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47) and patient satisfaction in health care (Qualiskope-A). Furthermore, the time course of direct costs of medical care (e.g. work disability days) and usage data of the intervention modules are analyzed. Among other statistical procedures, we use t-tests, univariate tests and growth curve models. Discussion If PIKKO proves to be effective, recommendations can be made to health organizations, which should lead to the concept being rolled out throughout Germany and included into oncological guidelines. We expect PIKKO to be a useful addition to usual cancer care, helping to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and reduce healthcare costs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A cluster randomized controlled trial for the Evaluation of routinely Measured PATient reported outcomes in HemodialYsis care (EMPATHY): a study protocol
    Jeffrey A. Johnson
    Fatima Al Sayah
    Robert Buzinski
    Bonnie Corradetti
    Sara N. Davison
    Meghan J. Elliott
    Scott Klarenbach
    Braden Manns
    Kara Schick-Makaroff
    Hilary Short
    Chandra Thomas
    Michael Walsh
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [32] The effectiveness of secondary and tertiary care lifestyle intervention in morbidly obese patients: a 1-year non-randomized controlled pragmatic clinical trial
    Gjevestad, E.
    Karlsen, T. I.
    Roislien, J.
    Maehlum, S.
    Hjelmesaeth, J.
    CLINICAL OBESITY, 2013, 3 (1-2) : 39 - 50
  • [33] Evaluation of a Novel Psychological Intervention Tailored for Patients With Early Cognitive Impairment (PIPCI): Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ekman, Urban
    Kemani, Mike K.
    Wallert, John
    Wicksell, Rikard K.
    Holmstrom, Linda
    Ngandu, Tiia
    Rennie, Anna
    Akenine, Ulrika
    Westman, Eric
    Kivipelto, Miia
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [34] Psycho-Oncological Intervention Through Counseling in Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in Treatment With Radioiodine (COUNTHY, NCT05054634): A Non-randomized Controlled Study
    Javaloyes, Nuria
    Crespo, Aurora
    Redal, M. Carmen
    Brugarolas, Antonio
    Botella, Lara
    Escudero-Ortiz, Vanesa
    Sureda, Manuel
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [35] The Transmural Trauma Care Model (TTCM) for the rehabilitation of trauma patients is effective in improving patient related outcome measures: a non-randomized controlled trial
    Wiertsema, Suzanne H.
    van Dongen, Johanna M.
    Geleijn, Edwin
    Beckerman, Heleen
    Bloemers, Frank W.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    de Groot, Vincent
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [36] Personalized, interdisciplinary patient pathway for cross-sector care of multimorbid patients (eliPfad trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Christoph Heinrich Lindemann
    Volker Burst
    Linus Alexander Völker
    Sebastian Brähler
    Dusan Simic
    Ingrid Becker
    Martin Hellmich
    Clarissa Kurscheid
    Nadine Scholten
    Ruben Krauspe
    Kerstin Leibel
    Stephanie Stock
    Paul Thomas Brinkkoetter
    Trials, 25
  • [37] The Transmural Trauma Care Model (TTCM) for the rehabilitation of trauma patients is effective in improving patient related outcome measures: a non-randomized controlled trial
    Suzanne H. Wiertsema
    Johanna M. van Dongen
    Edwin Geleijn
    Heleen Beckerman
    Frank W. Bloemers
    Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
    Vincent de Groot
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [38] Personalized, interdisciplinary patient pathway for cross-sector care of multimorbid patients (eliPfad trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Lindemann, Christoph Heinrich
    Burst, Volker
    Voelker, Linus Alexander
    Braehler, Sebastian
    Simic, Dusan
    Becker, Ingrid
    Hellmich, Martin
    Kurscheid, Clarissa
    Scholten, Nadine
    Krauspe, Ruben
    Leibel, Kerstin
    Stock, Stephanie
    Brinkkoetter, Paul Thomas
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [39] Efficacy of BETTER transitional care intervention for diverse patients with traumatic brain injury and their families: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Oyesanya, Tolu O.
    Ibemere, Stephanie O.
    You, Hyunbin
    Emerson, Maralis Mercado
    Pan, Wei
    Palipana, Anushka
    Kandel, Melissa
    Ingram, Darius
    Soto, Mayra
    Pioppo, Anne
    Albert, Brittany
    Walker-Atwater, Tamia
    Hawes, Jodi
    Komisarow, Jordan
    Ramos, Katherine
    Byom, Lindsey
    Gonzalez-Guarda, Rosa
    Van Houtven, Courtney H.
    Agarwal, Suresh
    Prvu Bettger, Janet
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [40] Evaluation of a physician communication training to promote early communication of palliative care and end-of-life issues in advanced oncology patients: A randomized controlled trial (PalliKOM)
    Harnischfeger, N.
    Rath, H. M.
    Brand, H.
    Haller, K.
    Rieder, N.
    Alt-Epping, B.
    Letsch, A.
    Thuss-Patience, P.
    Schieferdecker, A.
    Bokemeyer, C.
    Bergelt, C.
    Oechsle, K.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 45 (SUPPL 2) : 140 - 141