Intraoperative comparisons of knee kinematics of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:41
|
作者
Plaweski, Stephane [1 ]
Grimaldi, Mathieu [1 ]
Courvoisier, Aurelien [1 ]
Wimsey, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Grenoble, Echirolles, France
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Double-bundle reconstruction; Computer-assisted; Navigation; Biomechanics; Hamstring; PIVOT-SHIFT PHENOMENON; IN-SITU FORCES; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; FOLLOW-UP; NAVIGATION; STABILITY; ACCURACY; ROTATION; OUTCOMES; LOADS;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-011-1405-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Based on biomechanical anatomical studies, double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was introduced to achieve better stability in the knee, particularly in respect of rotatory loads. An in vivo, computer-assisted, double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction is superior to a single-bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction at reducing rotatory, and AP laxities of the tibia at 20 degrees of knee flexion and also during the pivot shift test. The data of 63 patients who had ACL reconstruction were prospectively collected. Thirty-two patients had single-bundle reconstruction (SB group), and 31 received double-bundle reconstruction (DB group). The per-operative navigation system (Praxim ACL surgetics System) helped to search for a minimal anisometry profile of the grafts, which was favorable (graft loosened with flexion) in the anatomic area of ACL insertion and preventing any conflict between the graft and the femoral notch. The system also evaluated anteroposterior (AP) rotational stabilities and pivot shift. The value of the pivot shift was calculated from the values of the maximum rotation and AP translation obtained when performing the manoeuver before and after ACL reconstruction, comparing SB and DB reconstruction. The post-operative AP displacement of the lateral compartment during the Lachman test was statistically reduced in DB group in comparison with SB group (5.1 +/- A 4.4 mm vs. 7.1 +/- A 3.2 mm, P = 0.04), whereas the AP displacements of the medial compartment were also reduced (3.4 +/- A 3.7 mm vs. 4.5 +/- A 2.6 mm, P = 0.15) but with no statistical significance. Internal and external rotations at 20A degrees of knee flexion were lower in the DB group than in SB group with statistical significance (respectively, 13.2 +/- A 4.9A degrees vs. 17.5 +/- A 4.0A degrees, P < 0.001 and 9.1 +/- A 3.6A degrees vs. 11.5 +/- A 3.5A degrees, P = 0.01). During the pivot shift test, the post-operative AP maximal translation was statistically different in both groups: 4.5 +/- A 2.1 mm in DB group and 6.3 +/- A 2.7 mm in SB group (P = 0.01)), whereas the maximal rotation was not statistically different: 3.8 +/- A 2.5A degrees in DB group and 3.4 +/- A 1.2A degrees in SB group (n.s.). Therefore, Colombet's index was similar in DB group and SB group (respectively, 0.21 +/- A 0.16 and 0.17 +/- A 0.06, (n.s.)). This study shows a significant intraoperative advantage in anterior and rotational stability for four-tunnel DB ACL reconstruction compared with SB ACL reconstruction. II.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1286
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis
    Li, Xue
    Xu, Chang-peng
    Song, Jin-qi
    Jiang, Nan
    Yu, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) : 213 - 226
  • [42] Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis
    Xue Li
    Chang-peng Xu
    Jin-qi Song
    Nan Jiang
    Bin Yu
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 213 - 226
  • [43] Prospective Comparative Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Double-Bundle and Single-Bundle Techniques
    Song, Eun Kyoo
    Oh, Luke S.
    Gill, Thomas J.
    Li, Guoan
    Gadikota, Hemanth R.
    Seon, Jong Keun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (09): : 1705 - 1711
  • [44] The Effect of Central Anatomical Single-Bundle versus Anatomical Double-Bundle Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament on Knee Stability. A Clinical Study
    Komzak, M.
    Hart, R.
    Smid, P.
    Puskeiler, M.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2014, 81 (04) : 276 - 280
  • [45] Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructiond-5-Year Results
    Mayr, Hermann O.
    Bruder, Silvia
    Hube, Robert
    Bernstein, Anke
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Stoehr, Amelie
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (09): : 2647 - 2653
  • [46] Mechanical behavior of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament repair with a single tibial tunnel
    Maestro Fernandez, A.
    Fernandez Lombardia, J.
    Paz Aparicio, A.
    Rodriguez Lopez, L.
    Garcia Gonzalez, P.
    Fernandez Lombardia, M., I
    Guerrero Rosales, M. A.
    Jorge Rellan, J.
    Vigil Castiello, F. J.
    TRAUMA-SPAIN, 2010, 21 (02): : 97 - 101
  • [47] A Retrospective Comparison of Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Ahn, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Jaehyun
    Mun, Ji Weon
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 37 (03): : 976 - 984
  • [48] Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative 2-Year Follow-up
    Mayr, Hermann O.
    Benecke, Paul
    Hoell, Anna
    Schmitt-Sody, Marcus
    Bernstein, Anke
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Stoehr, Amelie
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (01): : 34 - 42
  • [49] Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Double-Bundle, Anatomic Single-Bundle, and Nonanatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions
    Kondo, Eiji
    Merican, Azhar M.
    Yasuda, Kazunori
    Amis, Andrew A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02): : 279 - 288
  • [50] Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction
    Boyer, Jason
    Meislin, Robert J.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2010, 68 (02): : 119 - 126