Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy

被引:12
|
作者
Ziayee, F. [1 ]
Mueller-Lutz, A. [1 ]
Gross, J. [1 ]
Quentin, M. [1 ]
Ullrich, T. [1 ]
Heusch, P. [1 ]
Arsov, C. [2 ]
Rabenalt, R. [2 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
Antoch, G. [1 ]
Wittsack, H. J. [1 ]
Schimmoeller, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Urol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Arterial input function; Quantitative perfusion parameters; Tofts model; Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; Prostate MRI; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; CANCER-DETECTION; PI-RADS; LOCALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; SEQUENCES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Reproducibility of quantitative perfusion analysis of DCE requires a standardized AIF acquisition. However, there are many different approaches for AIF assessment so that the absolute values of perfusion parameters may vary depending on the used method. This study analyzes the influence of the method of AIF determination on quantitative DCE-MRI. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study three different methods of AIF determination in 50 consecutive patients with multiparametric MRI of the prostate were conducted. As a reference, AIF was selected manually by defining a region of interest in an artery manually (AIF(m)). The second method (AIF(a)), based on an automated algorithm and the third, population-derived AlFp where then compared. Primary endpoint were differences in the performance of the perfusion parameters K-trans, ve and k(ep) regarding the AIF acquisition methods, secondary endpoints consisted of the evaluation of differences in the peripheral and transition zone of the prostate (PZ, TZ). Results: In all three methods, K-trans, ve, and k(ep) were significantly higher in PZ than in TZ with K-trans showing least overlapping. There were no significant differences for K-trans determined with AIF(m), and AIF(a) (0.3 +/- 0.2 min(-1) for PZ for both and 0.5 +/- 0.3 min(-1) for TZ in AIF(m) and 0.4 +/- 0.3 min(-1) in AIF(a)), while there were great differences between AIF(a) and AIF(p) and AIF(m) and AIF(p) (0.1 +/- 0.03 min(-1) for TZ and PZ in AIF(p)). Spearman test demonstrated good correlation of values for K-trans and K-ep in all 3 methods (p >= 0.76). AIF(a) showed a success rate of 98% in finding the artery. Conclusion: AIF(a) is a recommendable user-independent automatical method to determine quantitative perfusion parameters allowing an objective measurement and saving interactive time for the radiologist. AIF(p) may be applied as second alternative method.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 33
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is a quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of added value for prostate cancer diagnosis?
    Turco, S.
    Fernandes, Dinis C.
    Miclea, R.
    Schoots, I. G.
    Nooijen, P.
    Van der Linden, H.
    Barentsz, J.
    Heijmink, S.
    Wijkstrah, H.
    Mischi, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S706 - S707
  • [22] The Added Value of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Sequences in Prostate MRI
    Withey, Samuel J.
    Amlani, Ashik
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2020, 2 (05):
  • [24] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for the detection of prostate cancer: A pilot study
    Isebaert, S.
    De Keyzer, F.
    Haustermans, K.
    Roskams, T.
    Van Poppel, H.
    Oyen, R.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2008, 63 (02): : 126 - 126
  • [25] Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization
    Lin, Yu-Chun
    Chan, Tsung-Han
    Chi, Chong-Yung
    Ng, Shu-Hang
    Liu, Hao-Li
    Wei, Kuo-Chen
    Wai, Yau-Yau
    Wang, Chun-Chieh
    Wang, Jiun-Jie
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2012, 68 (05) : 1439 - 1449
  • [26] Blind Multi-Channel Estimation of Arterial Input Function in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Jirik, R.
    Bartos, M.
    Standara, M.
    Taxt, T.
    ANALYSIS OF BIOMEDICAL SIGNALS AND IMAGES, 2010, : 373 - 377
  • [27] Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Keil, Vera C.
    Maedler, Burkhard
    Gieseke, Juergen
    Fimmers, Rolf
    Hattingen, Elke
    Schild, Hans H.
    Hadizadeh, Dariusch R.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 40 : 83 - 90
  • [28] Arterial input function estimation compensating for inflow and partial voluming in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Tseng, Chih-Hsien
    Nagtegaal, Martijn A.
    van Osch, Matthias J. P.
    Jaspers, Jaap
    Romero, Alejandra Mendez
    Wielopolski, Piotr
    Smits, Marion
    Vos, Frans M.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2024,
  • [29] Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Wang, Shiyang
    Fan, Xiaobing
    Zhang, Yue
    Medved, Milica
    He, Dianning
    Yousuf, Ambereen
    Jamison, Ernest
    Oto, Aytekin
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 5 (02) : 260 - 265
  • [30] Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Use of the Combination of Quantitative DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Hoetker, Andreas M.
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Aras, Oemer
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Gondo, Tatsuo
    Matsumoto, Kazuhiro
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Akin, Oguz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (04) : 756 - 763