Cumulative summation graphs are a useful tool for monitoring positive surgical margin rates in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:25
|
作者
Williams, Andrew K.
Chalasani, Venu
Martinez, Carlos H.
Osbourne, Erica
Stitt, Larry
Izawa, Jonathan I.
Pautler, Stephen E.
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Surg, Div Urol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Oncol, Div Urol, London, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Oncol, Div Surg Oncol, London, ON, Canada
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; outcome assessment (Health Care); CUSUM; quality control; robotics; LEARNING-CURVE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09634.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Whilst the technique of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has rapidly been adopted by surgeons there is little information on techniques used for quality control when a surgeon is learning this new surgical technique. Cummulative summation graphs have been used in cardiothoracic surgery to monitor complications with good effect and have been shown to be useful in monitoring outcomes from cystectomy. We demonstrate that using the technique of cumulative summation graphs a surgeon can monitor their progress prospectively through a learning curve without having to wait to perform a retrospective analysis. This study demonstrates that margin positive rates in radical prostatectomy can be monitored in real time and adjustments in technique applied to allow a surgeon to continually monitor and improve their surgical results. OBJECTIVE center dot To explore the usefulness of cumulative summation (CUSUM) graphs for monitoring positive surgical margin (PSM) rates during a surgeon's transition from open to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS center dot Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing RARP by a single surgeon. center dot Preoperatively all patients were either low or moderate risk under the D'Amico classification system. center dot A CUSUM graph was charted retrospectively to analyse the PSM rate in patients undergoing RARP for pathological stage T2 (pT2) disease. center dot Acceptable and unacceptable PSM rates were set at 10% and 15% respectively. RESULTS center dot From a cohort of 226 patients, 158 patients with pT2 disease were selected. The mean (range) age of these patients was 59.2 (39-73) years, the median (range) Gleason score was 6 (4-9), the mean (range) PSA was 6.43 (0.52-17.5) ng/mL and the mean (range) prostate volume was 44 (18-120) cm3. In all, 21 patients had PSMs (13%). center dot CUSUM graphs were produced and clearly demonstrated the change in PSM rate over time. CONCLUSION center dot CUSUM graphs are a novel and useful visual representation of the learning curve for surgeons. center dot PSM rates in patients with pT2 disease are a good outcome to monitor using CUSUM graphs as they are binary and lack the confounding factors associated with other outcomes such as continence and erectile dysfunction. center dot We advocate the use of CUSUM graphs as a method of quality assurance with the introduction of a robotics programme.
引用
收藏
页码:1648 / 1652
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does nerve sparing during robot assisted radical prostatectomy affect positive margin rates?
    Nunez, Rafael N.
    Andrews, Jack R.
    Andrews, Paul E.
    Ferrigni, Robert G.
    Humphreys, Mitchell R.
    Swanson, Scott K.
    Castle, Erik P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 612 - 613
  • [32] THE ROLE OF PROSTATE MRI 3D-RECONSTRUCTION ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN REDUCING POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN RATE
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    De Luca, Stefano
    Garrou, Diletta
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Amparore, Daniele
    Bollito, Enrico
    Fiori, Cristian
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (04) : 2097 - 2097
  • [33] PREDICTORS OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN IN ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Boylu, U.
    Pinsky, M.
    Lee, B.
    Thomas, R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A88 - A89
  • [36] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes
    Boylu, Ugur
    Basatac, Cem
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 38 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [37] CORRECTING SURGICAL PLANES DURING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Davis, John W.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A324 - A324
  • [38] A Multinational, Multi-institutional Study Comparing Positive Surgical Margin Rates Among 22 393 Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Patients
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Stricker, Phillip D.
    Ahlering, Thomas
    Eden, Christopher G.
    Wiklund, Peter N.
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Lee, David
    Neal, David E.
    Ghavamian, Reza
    Nyirady, Peter
    Nilsson, Andreas
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Loidl, Wolfgang
    Seitz, Christian
    Schramek, Paul
    Roehrborn, Claus
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Skarecky, Douglas
    Shaw, Greg
    Warren, Anne
    Delprado, Warick J.
    Haynes, Anne-Marie
    Steyerberg, Ewout
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (03) : 450 - 456
  • [39] DOES PROSTATE WEIGHT AFFECT PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES, POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN RATES AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PERFORMED BY AN EXPERIENCED SURGEON?
    Acquati, Pietro
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Albo, Giancarlo
    Sivaraman, Ananth
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Patel, Vipul R.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1881 - 1882
  • [40] Management of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Single institution experience
    Pang, See-Tong
    Lin, Po-Hung
    Chuang, Cheng-Keng
    Chang, Ying-Hsu
    Liu, Chung-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 71 - 72