The Trustworthy Autonomic Interface Guardian Architecture for Cyber-Physical Systems

被引:4
|
作者
Lyn, Kevin G. [1 ]
Lerner, Lee W. [1 ]
McCarty, Christopher J. [2 ]
Patterson, Cameron D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA
来源
CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS - DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING - PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING | 2015年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cyber-physical systems; autonomic control; embedded device security; trust; resilience;
D O I
10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.263
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The growing connectivity of cyber-physical systems (CPSes) has led to an increased concern over the ability of cyber-attacks to inflict physical damage. Current cyber-security measures focus on preventing attacks from penetrating control supervisory networks. These reactive techniques, however, are often plagued with vulnerabilities and zero-day exploits. Embedded processors in CPS field devices often possess little security of their own, and are easily exploited once the network is penetrated. We identify four possible outcomes of a cyber-attack on a CPS embedded processor. We then discuss five trust requirements that a device must satisfy to guarantee correct behavior through the device's lifecycle. Next, we examine the Trustworthy Autonomic Interface Guardian Architecture (TAIGA) which monitors communication between the embedded controller and physical process. This autonomic architecture provides the physical process with a last line of defense against cyber-attacks. TAIGA switches process control to a trusted backup controller if an attack causes a system specification violation. We conclude with experimental results of an implementation of TAIGA on a hazardous cargo-carrying robot.
引用
收藏
页码:1804 / 1811
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Towards trustworthy Cyber-physical Production Systems: A dynamic agent accountability approach
    Beregi, Richard
    Pedone, Gianfranco
    Preuveneers, Davy
    JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND SMART ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 13 (02) : 157 - 180
  • [42] Cyber-physical Systems
    Wolf, Wayne
    COMPUTER, 2009, 42 (03) : 88 - 89
  • [43] Cyber-Physical Systems
    Letichevsky A.A.
    Letychevskyi O.O.
    Skobelev V.G.
    Volkov V.A.
    Letichevsky, A.A. (aaletichevsky78@gmail.com), 2017, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC (53) : 821 - 834
  • [44] CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS
    Zanero, Stefano
    COMPUTER, 2017, 50 (04) : 15 - 16
  • [45] Cyber-Physical Systems
    Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, Francoise
    Di Benedetto, Maria Domenica
    Schoitsch, Erwin
    ERCIM NEWS, 2014, (97): : 6 - 7
  • [46] Cyber-physical Systems
    Vogel-Heuser, Birgit
    Kowalewski, Stefan
    AT-AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK, 2013, 61 (10) : 667 - 668
  • [47] Goal Modeling Method for Autonomic Control Of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS)
    Park, Jeongmin
    Kang, Sungjoo
    Chun, Ingeol
    Kim, Wontae
    2014 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICACT), 2014, : 295 - +
  • [48] The STAR-Guardian Network for the Protection of Long-Life Cyber-Physical Systems
    Avizienis, Algirdas
    Avizienis, Rimas
    Avizienis, Audrius
    2019 49TH ANNUAL IEEE/IFIP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS - SUPPLEMENTAL VOL (DSN-S), 2019, : 7 - 8
  • [49] Tutorial: Trustworthy Cyber Physical Systems
    Annaswamy, Anuradha
    Chakraborty, Samarjit
    Goswami, Dip
    Ramesh, S.
    Wolf, Marilyn
    Zamani, Majid
    2016 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VLSI DESIGN AND 2016 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (VLSID), 2016, : 19 - 20
  • [50] Decentralized Autonomous Architecture for Resilient Cyber-Physical Production Systems
    Prenzel, Laurin
    Steinhorst, Sebastian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (DATE 2021), 2021, : 1300 - 1303