A utility range-based interactive group support system for multiattribute decision making

被引:30
|
作者
Kim, JK
Choi, SH
机构
[1] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, Suwon 442760, Kyonggi, South Korea
[2] LGEDS Syst Inc, Consulting SSU, Youngdungpo Gu, Seoul 150010, South Korea
关键词
group decision support systems; multi-attribute decision making; interactive procedure; information systems evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00135-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This research suggests an interactive procedure for solving a multiattribute group decision problem using a range-typed utility information, and develops an interactive group support system (RINGS) to implement some capabilities of the procedure. It is often difficult for group members to articulate their preferences with cardinal values, instead they prefer to give incomplete information only. Utility ranges are obtained by solving linear programming problems with incompletely specified information. RINGS finds out conflicting opinions among group members, compares each member's preferences with the others', and suggests a direction for consensus seeking. The procedure of RINGS utilizes range-typed visual information, which helps the group reach a consensus. RINGS has several facilities like graphic user interface, model base, and database, so the total time to reach a group consensus is reduced. The evaluation of information systems is illustrated as a demonstration of some capabilities of RINGS.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:485 / 503
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Learning GAI-Decomposable Utility Models for Multiattribute Decision Making
    Herin, Margot
    Perny, Patrice
    Sokolovska, Nataliya
    THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 18, 2024, : 20412 - 20419
  • [32] Interactive decision aiding for group decision support
    Salo, A.A.
    Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands (84):
  • [33] Validating Multiattribute Decision Making Methods for Supporting Group Decisions
    Yeh, Chung-Hsing
    Chang, Yu-Hern
    2008 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 342 - +
  • [34] A COMPARISON OF WEIGHT APPROXIMATION TECHNIQUES IN MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY DECISION-MAKING
    STILLWELL, WG
    SEAVER, DA
    EDWARDS, W
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1981, 28 (01): : 62 - 77
  • [35] Multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic information
    Liu, Peide
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 430 : 599 - 619
  • [36] Multistage Multiattribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Triangular Fuzzy MULTIMOORA
    Dai, Wen-feng
    Zhong, Qiu-yan
    Qi, Chun-ze
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
  • [37] A formal approach to handling conflicts in multiattribute group decision making
    See, Tung-King
    Lewis, Kemper
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2006, 128 (04) : 678 - 688
  • [38] Utility measurement in support of decision making
    Dawson, N
    Singer, M
    Lenert, L
    Patterson, M
    Sami, S
    Lindstrom, H
    Smyth, K
    Barber, M
    Whitehouse, P
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2005, 17 : 32 - 32
  • [39] An Interactive Group Decision Making Approach Based on Satisfaction Degree
    Jiang, Wenqi
    Shen, Pingkang
    Liu, Fei
    Fang, Xi
    LISS 2014, 2015, : 1249 - 1254
  • [40] Rapid Fault Diagnosis Method of Elevator System Based on Multiattribute Decision Making
    Niu, Dapeng
    Qi, Chenshu
    Li, Guanghai
    Li, Hongru
    Pang, Hali
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2021, 2021