Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications

被引:693
|
作者
Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta [1 ]
Lahoz-Monfort, Jose J. [1 ]
Elith, Jane [1 ]
Gordon, Ascelin [2 ]
Kujala, Heini [1 ]
Lentini, Pia E. [1 ]
McCarthy, Michael A. [1 ]
Tingley, Reid [1 ]
Wintle, Brendan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2015年 / 24卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Ecological niche model; habitat model; imperfect detection; presence-absence; presence-background; presence-only; prevalence; sampling bias; PRESENCE-ONLY DATA; POINT PROCESS MODELS; IMPERFECT DETECTION; SELECTING THRESHOLDS; OCCUPANCY; ABSENCE; CONSERVATION; PREDICTION; MAXENT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/geb.12268
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species distribution models (SDMs) are used to inform a range of ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications. However, users often underestimate the strong links between data type, model output and suitability for end-use. We synthesize current knowledge and provide a simple framework that summarizes how interactions between data type and the sampling process (i.e. imperfect detection and sampling bias) determine the quantity that is estimated by a SDM. We then draw upon the published literature and simulations to illustrate and evaluate the information needs of the most common ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications of SDM outputs. We find that, while predictions of models fitted to the most commonly available observational data (presence records) suffice for some applications, others require estimates of occurrence probabilities, which are unattainable without reliable absence records. Our literature review and simulations reveal that, while converting continuous SDM outputs into categories of assumed presence or absence is common practice, it is seldom clearly justified by the application's objective and it usually degrades inference. Matching SDMs to the needs of particular applications is critical to avoid poor scientific inference and management outcomes. This paper aims to help modellers and users assess whether their intended SDM outputs are indeed fit for purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 292
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using genetic data to improve species distribution models
    Bouyer, Jeremy
    Lancelot, Renaud
    INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 63 : 292 - 294
  • [22] Which bird traits most affect the goodness-of-fit of species distribution models?
    Morelli, Federico
    Benedetti, Yanina
    Stanford, Jesse
    Jerzak, Leszek
    Tryjanowski, Piotr
    Perna, Paolo
    Santolini, Riccardo
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 158
  • [23] Integrating disparate survey data in species distribution models demonstrate the need for robust model evaluation
    Nephin, Jessica
    Thompson, Patrick L.
    Anderson, Sean C.
    Park, Ashley E.
    Rooper, Christopher N.
    Aulthouse, Brendan
    Watson, Joe
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2023, 80 (12) : 1869 - 1889
  • [24] Associations between species can influence the goodness of fit of species distribution models: The case of two passerine birds
    Morelli, Federico
    Tryjanowski, Piotr
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2014, 20 : 208 - 212
  • [25] Fit for purpose? Rapid development of water allocation models using global data: Application for the Upper Niger Basin
    Meijer, Karen
    Verschelling, Eelco
    van Verseveld, Willem
    Donchyts, Gennadii
    Schmeier, Susanne
    Kwadijk, Jaap
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2021, 145
  • [26] GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS AND MODEL SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR DIAMETER DISTRIBUTION MODELS
    REYNOLDS, MR
    BURK, TE
    HUANG, WC
    FOREST SCIENCE, 1988, 34 (02) : 373 - 399
  • [27] Integrating harvest and camera trap data in species distribution models
    Gilbert, Neil A.
    Pease, Brent S.
    Anhalt-Depies, Christine M.
    Clare, John D. J.
    Stenglein, Jennifer L.
    Townsend, Philip A.
    Van Deelen, Timothy R.
    Zuckerberg, Benjamin
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 258
  • [28] Combining fishery data through integrated species distribution models
    Paradinas, Iosu
    Illian, Janine B.
    Alonso-Fernaendez, Alexandre
    Pennino, Maria Grazia
    Smout, Sophie
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 80 (10) : 2579 - 2590
  • [29] Resolving misaligned spatial data with integrated species distribution models
    Pacifici, Krishna
    Reich, Brian J.
    Miller, David A. W.
    Pease, Brent S.
    ECOLOGY, 2019, 100 (06)
  • [30] A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data
    Korhonen, Pekka
    Hui, Francis K. C.
    Niku, Jenni
    Taskinen, Sara
    van Der Veen, Bert
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 15 (12): : 2359 - 2372