Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications

被引:693
|
作者
Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta [1 ]
Lahoz-Monfort, Jose J. [1 ]
Elith, Jane [1 ]
Gordon, Ascelin [2 ]
Kujala, Heini [1 ]
Lentini, Pia E. [1 ]
McCarthy, Michael A. [1 ]
Tingley, Reid [1 ]
Wintle, Brendan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2015年 / 24卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Ecological niche model; habitat model; imperfect detection; presence-absence; presence-background; presence-only; prevalence; sampling bias; PRESENCE-ONLY DATA; POINT PROCESS MODELS; IMPERFECT DETECTION; SELECTING THRESHOLDS; OCCUPANCY; ABSENCE; CONSERVATION; PREDICTION; MAXENT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/geb.12268
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species distribution models (SDMs) are used to inform a range of ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications. However, users often underestimate the strong links between data type, model output and suitability for end-use. We synthesize current knowledge and provide a simple framework that summarizes how interactions between data type and the sampling process (i.e. imperfect detection and sampling bias) determine the quantity that is estimated by a SDM. We then draw upon the published literature and simulations to illustrate and evaluate the information needs of the most common ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications of SDM outputs. We find that, while predictions of models fitted to the most commonly available observational data (presence records) suffice for some applications, others require estimates of occurrence probabilities, which are unattainable without reliable absence records. Our literature review and simulations reveal that, while converting continuous SDM outputs into categories of assumed presence or absence is common practice, it is seldom clearly justified by the application's objective and it usually degrades inference. Matching SDMs to the needs of particular applications is critical to avoid poor scientific inference and management outcomes. This paper aims to help modellers and users assess whether their intended SDM outputs are indeed fit for purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 292
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commentary on Fit-For-Purpose Models for Regulatory Applications
    Wang, Yaning
    Huang, Shiew Mei
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 108 (01) : 18 - 20
  • [2] Fit for purpose models for metrology: a model selection methodology
    Wright, L.
    Esward, T. J.
    2013 JOINT IMEKO (INTERNATIONAL MEASUREMENT CONFEDERATION) TC1-TC7-TC13 SYMPOSIUM: MEASUREMENT ACROSS PHYSICAL AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES, 2013, 459
  • [3] Fit-for-Purpose: Species Distribution Model Performance Depends on Evaluation Criteria - Dutch Hoverflies as a Case Study
    Aguirre-Gutierrez, Jesus
    Carvalheiro, Luisa G.
    Polce, Chiara
    van Loon, E. Emiel
    Raes, Niels
    Reemer, Menno
    Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):
  • [4] Is my model fit for purpose? Validating a population model for predicting freshwater fish responses to flow management
    Hale, Robin
    Yen, Jian D. L.
    Todd, Charles R.
    Stuart, Ivor G.
    Wootton, Henry F.
    Thiem, Jason D.
    Koehn, John D.
    Tonkin, Zeb
    Lyon, Jarod P.
    Mccarthy, Michael A.
    Bird, Tomas J.
    Fanson, Ben G.
    ECOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (09):
  • [5] On assessing model fit for distribution-free longitudinal models under missing data
    Wu, P.
    Tu, X. M.
    Kowalski, J.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (01) : 143 - 157
  • [6] Assessing model fit in joint models of longitudinal and survival data with applications to cancer clinical trials
    Zhang, Danjie
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Ibrahim, Joseph G.
    Boye, Mark E.
    Wang, Ping
    Shen, Wei
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (27) : 4715 - 4733
  • [7] The Appropriate Elicitation of Expert Opinion in Economic Models Making Expert Data Fit for Purpose
    Sullivan, William
    Payne, Katherine
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2011, 29 (06) : 455 - 459
  • [8] Calibration of hybrid species distribution models: the value of general-purpose vs. targeted monitoring data
    De Caceres, Miquel
    Brotons, Lluis
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2012, 18 (10) : 977 - 989
  • [9] Ecological principles of species distribution models: the habitat matching rule
    Cassini, Marcelo H.
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2011, 38 (11) : 2057 - 2065
  • [10] Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models
    Newbold, Tim
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 34 (01) : 3 - 22