Uncharacteristic Task-Evoked Pupillary Responses Implicate Atypical Locus Ceruleus Activity in Autism

被引:18
|
作者
Granovetter, Michael C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Burlingham, Charlie S. [4 ]
Blauch, Nicholas M. [2 ]
Minshew, Nancy J. [5 ]
Heeger, David J. [4 ,6 ]
Behrmann, Marlene [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Neurosci Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] NYU, Dept Psychol, 6 Washington Pl, New York, NY 10003 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[6] NYU, Ctr Neural Sci, New York, NY 10003 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 2020年 / 40卷 / 19期
关键词
attention; autism; excitation-inhibition; locus ceruleus; neural gain; pupillometry; ADAPTIVE GAIN; NEURAL GAIN; COERULEUS; ATTENTION; SIZE; PUPILLOMETRY; VARIABILITY; PLASTICITY; DIAMETER; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2680-19.2020
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized partly by atypical attentional engagement, reflected in exaggerated and variable responses to sensory stimuli. Attentional engagement is known to be regulated by the locus ceruleus (LC). Moderate baseline LC activity globally dampens neural responsivity and is associated with adaptive deployment and narrowing of attention to task-relevant stimuli. In contrast, increased baseline LC activity enhances neural responsivity across cortex and widening of attention to environmental stimuli regardless of their task relevance. Given attentional atypicalities in ASD, this study is the first to evaluate whether, under different attentional task demands, individuals with ASD exhibit a different profile of LC activity compared with typically developing controls. Males and females with ASD and age- and gender-matched controls participated in a one-back letter detection test while task-evoked pupillary responses, an established correlate for LC activity, were recorded. Participants completed this task in two conditions, either in the absence or presence of distractor auditory tones. Compared with controls, individuals with ASD evinced atypical pupillary responses in the presence versus absence of distractors. Notably, this atypical pupillary profile was evident despite the fact that both groups exhibited equivalent task performance. Moreover, between-group differences in pupillary responses were observed specifically in response to task-relevant events, providing confirmation that the group differences most likely were specifically associated with distinctions in LC activity. These findings suggest that individuals with ASD show atypical modulation of LC activity with changes in attentional demands, offering a possible mechanistic and neurobiological account for attentional atypicalities in ASD.
引用
收藏
页码:3815 / 3826
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spontaneous and Task-Evoked Brain Activity Negatively Interact
    He, Biyu J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (11): : 4672 - 4682
  • [22] The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry
    Reilly, Jamie
    Kelly, Alexandra
    Kim, Seung Hwan
    Jett, Savannah
    Zuckerman, Bonnie
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 51 (02) : 865 - 878
  • [23] Task-evoked pupil responses reflect internal belief states
    Colizoli, Olympia
    de Gee, Jan Willem
    Urai, Anne E.
    Donner, Tobias H.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [24] Task-evoked pupil responses reflect internal belief states
    Olympia Colizoli
    Jan Willem de Gee
    Anne E. Urai
    Tobias H. Donner
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [25] Task-evoked pupillary responses track precision-weighted prediction errors and learning rate during interceptive visuomotor actions
    D. J. Harris
    T. Arthur
    S. J. Vine
    J. Liu
    H. R. Abd Rahman
    F. Han
    M. R. Wilson
    Scientific Reports, 12 (1)
  • [26] Task-evoked pupillary responses track precision-weighted prediction errors and learning rate during interceptive visuomotor actions
    Harris, D. J.
    Arthur, T.
    Vine, S. J.
    Liu, J.
    Abd Rahman, H. R.
    Han, F.
    Wilson, M. R.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [27] The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry
    Jamie Reilly
    Alexandra Kelly
    Seung Hwan Kim
    Savannah Jett
    Bonnie Zuckerman
    Behavior Research Methods, 2019, 51 : 865 - 878
  • [28] Task-Evoked Pupillary Response as a Potential Biomarker of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review
    Zeeman, Michael
    Figeys, Mathieu
    Brimmo, Tolani
    Burnstad, Cleo
    Hao, Jasmine
    Kim, Esther S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS, 2023, 38
  • [29] Frequency analysis of a task-evoked pupillary response: Luminance-independent measure of mental effort
    Peysakhovich, Vsevolod
    Causse, Mickael
    Scannella, Sebastien
    Dehais, Frederic
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 97 (01) : 30 - 37
  • [30] The situation or the person? Individual and task-evoked differences in BOLD activity
    Bolt, Taylor
    Nomi, Jason S.
    Bainter, Sierra A.
    Cole, Michael W.
    Uddin, Lucina Q.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2019, 40 (10) : 2943 - 2954