On the relationship between fuzzy autoepistemic logic and fuzzy modal logics of belief

被引:3
|
作者
Blondeel, Marjon [4 ]
Flaminio, Tommaso [1 ]
Schockaert, Steven [2 ]
Godo, Lluis [3 ]
De Cock, Martine [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Theor & Appl Sci, I-21100 Varese, Italy
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Cardiff CF24 3AA, S Glam, Wales
[3] CSIC, Artficial Intelligence Res Inst IIIA, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Appl Math Comp Sci & Stat, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[5] Univ Washington, Ctr Web & Data Sci, Tacoma, WA 98402 USA
关键词
Autoepistemic logic; Fuzzy logic; Lukasiewicz logic; Nonmonotonic modal logic; Logic of only knowing; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fss.2015.02.018
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Autoepistemic logic is an important formalism for nonmonotonic reasoning originally intended to model an ideal rational agent reflecting upon his own beliefs. Fuzzy autoepistemic logic is a generalization of autoepistemic logic that allows to represent an agent's rational beliefs on gradable propositions. It has recently been shown that, in the same way as autoepistemic logic generalizes answer set programming, fuzzy autoepistemic logic generalizes fuzzy answer set programming as well. Besides being related to answer set programming, autoepistemic logic is also closely related to several modal logics. To investigate whether a similar relationship holds in a fuzzy logical setting, we firstly generalize the main modal logics for belief to the setting of finitely-valued Lukasiewicz logic with truth constants L-k(c), and secondly we relate them with fuzzy autoepistemic logics. Moreover, we show that the problem of satisfiability checking in these logics is NP-complete. Finally, we generalize Levesque's results on stable expansions, belief sets, and "only knowing" operators to our setting, and provide a complete axiomatization for a logic of "only knowing" in the L-k(c) framework. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 99
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relationship between qualitative physics and fuzzy logic in natural subsystems
    Prabakaran, G.
    Vaithiyanathan, D.
    Ganesan, Madhavi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PURE & APPLIED PHYSICS, 2020, 58 (01) : 44 - 49
  • [32] Fuzzy logics as the logics of chains
    Behounek, L
    Cintula, P
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2006, 157 (05) : 604 - 610
  • [33] JOINING GODEL AND ZADEH FUZZY LOGICS IN FUZZY DESCRIPTION LOGICS
    Bobillo, Fernando
    Delgado, Miguel
    Gomez-Romero, Juan
    Straccia, Umberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2012, 20 (04) : 475 - 508
  • [34] Handling Analogical Proportions in Classical Logic and Fuzzy Logics Settings
    Miclet, Laurent
    Prade, Henri
    SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5590 : 638 - +
  • [35] Logics of formal inconsistency arising from systems of fuzzy logic
    Coniglio, Marcelo E.
    Esteva, Francesc
    Godo, Lluis
    LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL, 2014, 22 (06) : 880 - 904
  • [36] On witnessed models in fuzzy logic III - witnessed Godel logics
    Hajek, Petr
    MATHEMATICAL LOGIC QUARTERLY, 2010, 56 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [37] Fuzzy Logics and Fuzzy Model Theory
    Pal'chunov, D. E.
    Yakhyaeva, G. E.
    ALGEBRA AND LOGIC, 2015, 54 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [38] ON THE RELATION BETWEEN DEFAULT AND AUTOEPISTEMIC LOGIC
    KONOLIGE, K
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1988, 35 (03) : 343 - 382
  • [39] Fuzzy Logics and Fuzzy Model Theory
    D. E. Pal’chunov
    G. E. Yakhyaeva
    Algebra and Logic, 2015, 54 : 74 - 80
  • [40] Social Relationship explained by Fuzzy Logic
    Araujo, Ernesto
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 2131 - 2136