Predictive mapping of the biotic condition of conterminous US rivers and streams

被引:55
|
作者
Hill, Ryan A. [1 ]
Fox, Eric W. [1 ]
Leibowitz, Scott G. [1 ]
Olsen, Anthony R. [1 ]
Thornbrugh, Darren J. [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Marc H. [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Western Ecol Div, 200 SW 35th St, Corvallis, OR 97333 USA
[2] Natl Pk Serv, Northern Great Plains Network, 231 East St,Joseph St, Rapid City, SD 55701 USA
关键词
benthic invertebrates; conterminous United States; multimetric index; National Rivers and Streams Assessment; random forest modeling; StreamCat; streams; BIOLOGICAL CONDITION; ECOLOGICAL CONDITION; RAPID BIOASSESSMENT; MULTIMETRIC INDEXES; UNITED-STATES; MACROINVERTEBRATES; MODELS; FISH; INTERMITTENT; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.1002/eap.1617
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding and mapping the spatial variation in stream biological condition could provide an important tool for conservation, assessment, and restoration of stream ecosystems. The USEPA's 2008-2009 National Rivers and Streams Assessment (NRSA) summarizes the percentage of stream lengths within the conterminous United States that are in good, fair, or poor biological condition based on a multimetric index of benthic invertebrate assemblages. However, condition is usually summarized at regional or national scales, and these assessments do not provide substantial insight into the spatial distribution of conditions at unsampled locations. We used random forests to model and predict the probable condition of several million kilometers of streams across the conterminous United States based on nearby and upstream landscape features, including human-related alterations to watersheds. To do so, we linked NRSA sample sites to the USEPA's Stream Cat Dataset; a database of several hundred landscape metrics for all 1:100,000-scale streams and their associated watersheds within the conterminous United States. The StreamCat data provided geospatial indicators of nearby and upstream land use, land cover, climate, and other landscape features for modeling. Nationally, the model correctly predicted the biological condition class of 75% of NRSA sites. Although model evaluations suggested good discrimination among condition classes, we present maps as predicted probabilities of good condition, given upstream and nearby landscape settings. Inversely, the maps can be interpreted as the probability of a stream being in poor condition, given human-related watershed alterations. These predictions are available for download from the USEPA's StreamCat website. Finally, we illustrate how these predictions could be used to prioritize streams for conservation or restoration.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2397 / 2415
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Occurrence and characterization of pesticide mixtures in central US streams and rivers
    Gilliom, Robert
    Corbin, Mark
    Nowell, Lisa
    Sandstrom, Mark
    Qian, Yaorong
    Hladik, Michelle
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [22] Distribution of nonnative aquatic vertebrates in western US streams and rivers
    Lomnicky, Gregg A.
    Whitrier, Thomas R.
    Hughes, Robert M.
    Peck, David V.
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (04) : 1082 - 1093
  • [23] Microbial enzyme stoichiometry and nutrient limitation in US streams and rivers
    Hill, Brian H.
    Elonen, Colleen M.
    Seifert, Lindsey R.
    May, Ashley A.
    Tarquinio, Ellen
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 18 : 540 - 551
  • [24] Modeling agricultural pesticide concentration and load trends in US streams and rivers
    Ryberg, Karen
    York, Benjamin
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [25] Regional patterns of anthropogenic influences on streams and rivers in the conterminous United States, from the early 1970s to 2012
    Falcone, James A.
    Murphy, Jennifer C.
    Sprague, Lori A.
    JOURNAL OF LAND USE SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (06) : 585 - 614
  • [26] Correspondence between a recreational fishery index and ecological condition for USA streams and rivers
    Lomnicky, Gregg A.
    Hughes, Robert M.
    Peck, David, V
    Ringold, Paul L.
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2021, 233
  • [27] Identifying Watershed, Landscape, and Engineering Design Factors that Influence the Biotic Condition of Restored Streams
    Doll, Barbara
    Jennings, Gregory
    Spooner, Jean
    Penrose, David
    Usset, Joseph
    Blackwell, James
    Fernandez, Mark
    WATER, 2016, 8 (04):
  • [28] Conterminous US and Alaska Forest Type Mapping Using Forest Inventory and Analysis Data
    Ruefenacht, B.
    Finco, M. V.
    Nelson, M. D.
    Czaplewski, R.
    Helmer, E. H.
    Blackard, J. A.
    Holden, G. R.
    Lister, A. J.
    Salajanu, D.
    Weyermann, D.
    Winterberger, K.
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 74 (11): : 1379 - 1388
  • [29] A comparison of biotic groups as dry-phase indicators of ecological quality in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams
    Stubbington, Rachel
    Paillex, Amael
    England, Judy
    Barthes, Amelie
    Bouchez, Agnes
    Rimet, Frederic
    Mar Sanchez-Montoya, Maria
    Westwood, Christian G.
    Datry, Thibault
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 97 : 165 - 174
  • [30] Development of indices of biotic integrity for high-gradient wadeable rivers and headwater streams in New Jersey
    Vile, John S.
    Henning, Brian F.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 90 : 469 - 484